⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 9 findings
F1
There are insufficient tools, equipment and employees available to maintain the cemetery. This has caused the cemetery to become neglected, which is disrespectful to the veterans who are buried there.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The irrigation system is not adequate to provide consistent water to the entire cemetery. This should be resolved when the reclaimed water irrigation system is installed in 2023/2024.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
There are no funds allocated specifically for VLC in the Fresno County budget.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The locked restrooms are repeatedly vandalized. The restrooms have been boarded up and there is no access available.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The cinder block wall surrounding the water tank is in disrepair. This is unsightly and hazardous.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The Fresno County Board of Supervisors recently approved the use of ARPA funds for reclaimed water for VLC. After the Grand Jury initiated this investigation, this funding was approved.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
There appears to be no consistent coordination between Fresno County Parks Department and organizations who are interested in donating time and/or funds to VLC.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Several dead trees along the cemetery walkways were hazardous to people who visit the cemetery; this has been rectified by removal of the trees by the Fresno County tree crews.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
There was a lack of adequate signage directing visitors to VLC. This has been corrected, the signs are now updated, and there are plans to provide more 32 directional signs from Hwy 99.
No recommendations for this finding
Conclusions 12
-
CL1Citizens Review Panel oversight responsibilities to the Board of Supervisors
-
CL2Updating and expanding the Operational Service Delivery Plan
-
CL3Library Long Term Facilities Planning
-
CL4Community Engagement and Public Awareness campaign
-
CL5Measure B Funding Compliance. Each of these suggested areas for consideration should be included in an all inclusive Master Plan Program similar to a public school district's facilities long term program. Such programs are often facilitated by professional Program Management firms experienced in bringing together all stakeholders responsible for maximizing their collective stewardship of public funds. The Grand Jury suggests that similar program services be considered.
-
CL6Policies, Practices, and Enforcement: ▪ All Fresno County School Boards should clearly define and implement appropriate funding and policies to maximize school security and student safety. These policies should be reviewed and updated at least annually. ▪ Fresno County schools should follow and enforce the safety and security policies established by the school districts. For example, if a door should remain closed and locked during class, close and lock the door(s) during class. ▪ Fresno County school security officials should meet annually to exchange ideas, learn from what others are implementing that may work in your district, and share new ideas. ▪ School districts should research and annually apply for grant programs to fund improvements to security equipment and security staffing. ▪ Each school should have a trained, sworn, and equipped School Resource Officer. ▪ All school administration and the assigned police and sheriff jurisdiction should meet annually to discuss policies and procedures to ensure proper coordination in all emergency situations.
-
CL7Access Control: ▪ School access should be limited and actively and consistently enforced.
-
CL8Physical Barriers: ▪ Physical barriers (walls, fences, and locked doors) should be used, where deemed appropriate by the governing board, to limit unauthorized access to schools. 95
-
CL9Communications: ▪ An “exchange” (where surplus equipment is donated and made available to those who need it) for security gear/equipment should be implemented and made available for all Fresno County schools through the FCOE in cooperation with the Fresno County Sheriff’s Office. ▪ Each school shall develop and implement an effective communication method with students, staff, parents, and the community during an emergency. ▪ “Panic buttons” (emergency notification system, phone app., etc.) should be installed in each classroom, library, cafeteria, and all offices.
-
CL10Video Surveillance ▪ Each school should maximize the use of video surveillance (both external and internal), including properly staffed and trained surveillance monitors.
-
CL11Parental Involvement ▪ Parental involvement is necessary and essential to maximum safety and security. Schools should sponsor annual (at a minimum) parent meetings to discuss school safety and security. ▪ Schools should inform parents of all recently implemented or installed emergency communications and safety improvements. ▪ The emergency communication tools (social media, web apps, etc.) the schools implement and utilize should be readily available to parents and guardians.
-
CL12Training and Drills ▪ All School Districts: Should conduct at least one “full” on-site active shooter emergency drill (including law enforcement, EMT, and related services) bi-annually (at a minimum) to evaluate their preparedness to manage emergency situations. 96 ▪ All Schools: Should conduct at least one on-site active shooter emergency drill annually to familiarize their staff and students with their emergency evaluation and response procedures. ▪ All Fresno County School District staff, including but not limited to administration, teachers, janitorial/maintenance, cafeteria, support, etc., should attend “Seconds to Survive” or a similar active shooter scenario video on a recurring basis. ▪ All local law enforcement agencies, the Fresno County Sheriff’s Office, and the specialized police departments should provide active shooter training to all appropriate personnel. ▪ Local law enforcement should familiarize themselves with the campus layout of all schools within their jurisdiction. FINDINGS (Note: All findings are based on interviews conducted by a minimum of two current Grand Jurors.) F1 FCOE, DBH, and county schools take school safety very seriously. F2 Local law enforcement and school officials have experienced difficulty motivating large numbers of parents to be involved in school safety and security. F3 Some schools have policies in their Comprehensive Safety and Security Plans (CSSP) requiring access to be controlled, but these policies are not always enforced (e.g., Controlled Access: External and internal doors should be closed and locked, and strictly control school access to individuals who are not students or staff). F4 Some schools were unable to enhance security because of limited radio communications among school staff and/or law enforcement. F5 Some school campuses have limited or no funding for security upgrades or programs based on school district or individual school priorities. F6 Local law enforcement agencies have procedures in place to address the immediate response to an active shooter incident. 97 F7 Local schools and law enforcement work well and cooperate closely. F8 Fresno County DBH, FCOE, Fresno County schools, and local law enforcement have developed a highly effective and collaborative methodology to identify and intervene when a student is identified as a potential risk. F9 A well-designed and appropriately monitored video surveillance system with trained staff is an important and valuable safety system for schools.