Received Clerk of the Napa Superior Court Public Works Department*

Published: September 16, 2003 5 pages

View Original PDF

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings and Recommendations 1 findings

F2 Page 1

Public awareness of water issues needs to be heightened. Flowing water is constrained by inventory, funding, pipe capacity, entitlement programs and citizen consent.

Related Recommendations (1)

Page 1

– Water Conservation Dear Judge Snowden and Members of the Grand Jury: This letter is in response to the 2002-2003 Grand Jury Water Report Finding 2 and Recommendation 2 regarding water conservation efforts. The City would like to commend the Grand Jury Committee in their willingness to take on the monumental task of reviewing the many complex and diverse water issues in Napa County. In particular, the City is pleased to see an emphasis placed on water conservation efforts. The City places a high priority on water conservation and continues to implement innovative programs to increase conservation efforts by our customers. The 2002-2003 Grand Jury Water Report suggested the following:

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Napa City

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.