📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 27 findings
F1
Page 92
The CPRB is a seven-member voluntary board. Each city council member appoints one candidate for a seated position on the CPRB. The term of each member of the CPRB coincides with the term of the nominating city council member. Each member may serve a maximum of 8 consecutive years on the CPRB.
F2
Page 92
The board meets on the second Monday of every month for a public, open meeting from 5:30PM to 8:00PM in the city council chambers. In addition, the board meets in closed sessions to discuss confidential police personnel issues. The board met 14 times in 1999 for closed-session reviews.
F3
Page 92
Pursuant to CPRB by-laws, to be a member of the CPRB, one must • Be a qualified voter of the City of Santa Cruz • Not be employed by the City of Santa Cruz • Possess a reputation for fairness, integrity and responsibility • Have demonstrated an active interest in public affairs and service Page78 Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
F4
According to California Penal Code §832.5(a) “Each department or agency in this state which employs peace officers shall establish a procedure to investigate citizens’ complaints against the personnel of such departments or agencies, and shall make a written description of the procedure available to the public.”
F5
Page 93
A police review board is not mandated by the state. It is a discretionary review process and most cities do not have such a board. Santa Cruz City Police Department is the only law enforcement agency in Santa Cruz County to have a review board.
F6
Page 93
The CPRB provides an additional level of police oversight. The Board provides citizens an alternative place to express concerns outside of the police department.
F7
Page 93
The Santa Cruz Police Department Citizen Comment Brochure contains the comment form for the use of citizens. The form states that according to California Penal Code §148.6(b), the person making the comment is provided the following instruction: “You have the right to make a complaint against a police officer for any improper police conduct. California law requires this agency to have a procedure to investigate citizens’ complaints. You have a right to a written description of this procedure. This agency may find after investigation that there is not enough evidence to warrant action on your complaint; even if that is the case, you have the right to make the complaint and have it investigated if you believe an officer behaved improperly. Citizen complaints and any reports or finding relating to complaints must be retained by this agency for at least five years. It is against the law to make a complaint that you know to be false. If you make a complaint against an officer knowing that it is false, you can be prosecuted on a misdemeanor charge.”
F8
Page 93
Citizen comment forms on the Santa Cruz City Police Department are available at the following locations in the City of Santa Cruz: • Santa Cruz Police Department • Citizens’ Police Review Board • City Clerk’s Office
F9
Page 93
Citizens may classify their comment in the following manner: • Commendation • Comment • Request for Mediation Information • Citizen Inquiry • Citizen Complaint
F10
Page 93
A commendation is one of the available options that the Santa Cruz City Police Department utilizes in its comment brochure in order to encourage positive feedback. Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
F11
Page 94
If the citizen chooses to make any comments, each comment is categorized as follows: • A policy with which you agree/disagree • A procedure which was/was not properly followed • A procedure which you agree/disagree • A positive or negative comment regarding attitude, behavior or conduct by a city employee • A possible violation of the law
F12
Page 94
Should a citizen request mediation, the CPRB has contracted with the Conflict Resolution Center of Santa Cruz County to provide mediation services. The process can include the following: • Mediation helps the parties communicate and come to agreements that are mutually acceptable. • Either party may request mediation at any time during the review process. • Mediation is voluntary and must be agreed to by all parties involved before it can be implemented. • All requests for mediation must be in writing. • Mediation is conducted at no cost to the parties involved and every reasonable effort will be made to schedule mediation sessions at the convenience of those involved. • Mediation sessions are closed to the public. The Police Chief and the CPRB report that very few complainants request or accept mediation as a recourse to their complaint.
F13
Page 94
If a citizen indicates on the comment form that an inquiry is desired, the process is handled immediately by the supervisor of the involved officer. The supervisor is provided with the details of the inquiry. The supervisor is then instructed to immediately review the matter with the officer and provide the appropriate training or counseling or corrective action to prevent any further recurrence. The CPRB does not handle inquiries. Page80 Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
F14
Page 95
According to the 1999 Annual Report, the CPRB reviewed 27 citizen complaints, some of which contained multiple allegations. The range of allegations included the following: Range of Allegations Conduct Procedural Officer misconduct Unlawful arrest Excessive force Unlawful search Missing/damaged property Improper procedure Discrimination Failure to take action Conduct Allegations Officer Excessive Missing/Damaged Year Conduct Force Property Discrimination Total 1999 22 4 1 0 27 1998 18 7 2 0 27 1997 20 7 1 0 28 Procedural Allegations Unlawful Unlawful Improper Failure To Year Arrest Search Procedure Take Action Policy Total 1999 2 1 31 5 0 39 1998 6 5 12 0 0 23 1997 8 3 22 2 1 36 Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
F15
Page 96
If the comment form indicates that a complaint is being filed, the process necessitates a formal investigation into the incident by Internal Affairs or the officer’s chain of command. The following will occur: • The case is assigned to the Internal Affairs Investigator. • The Internal Affairs Investigator collects evidence and conduct interviews of the officers and any witnesses. • The Internal Affairs Investigator makes his/her investigation available to CPRB in the form of a report and submits findings to the chief of police. • The CPRB must review the completed investigation. • The CPRB may: @ Ask for further information from the chief of police @ Call for an independent investigation @ Hold hearings @ Subpoena witnesses and take testimony @ Make a ruling on the case as presented by the Internal Affairs report. • The CPRB report is sent to the chief of police stating its findings and
F16
Page 96
Prior to the establishment of the CPRB, the process of a complaint involved the following: • The case was assigned to an Internal Affairs Investigator. • The Internal Affairs Investigator collected evidence and conduct interviews of the officers and any witnesses. • An investigator submitted findings to the chief of police. • The chief of police considered the Internal Affairs report prior to his final determination of the outcome of the complaint. • The chief of police notified the complainant and the involved officers of the Chief’s findings and conclusions. Page82 Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
F17
Page 97
In 1999, the CPRB determined that 94% of allegations were not sustained and the chief of police determined that 97% of the same allegations were not sustained. The CPRB Annual Report defines the term not sustained as “the review fails to disclose sufficient facts to prove the allegation made in the complaint.” CPRB Findings on Allegations Reviewed % Not Year %Sustained Sustained 1999 6 94 1998 11 89 1997 9 91 Chief of Police Findings on Allegations Reviewed % Not Year % Sustained Sustained 1999 3 97 1998 10 90 1997 10 90
F18
Page 97
In 1999, 11 out of 28 complaints (one of which was not reviewed in 1999) came from the downtown Santa Cruz area. Out of the 27 complaints reviewed, the Board was unanimous in its findings on 20 of the complaints reviewed, split on findings in 4 complaints, made no findings in 2 complaints, and finding was pending on 1 complaint.
F19
Page 97
According to the City of Santa Cruz Information Report for Year-end 1999. The 27 complaints received comprised 0.05% of the total 60,763 calls handled by the police department.
F20
Page 97
According to the City of Santa Cruz Citizens’ Police Review Board 1999 Annual Report, “there were only a relatively small number of complaints…the small number supports the overall good effort of the City’s Police Department.”
F21
Page 97
In September 1999, the CPRB conducted its first independent investigation. This investigation was in response to community concerns and complaints of excessive force stemming from arrests at an anti-war demonstration. The added expense of an investigator caused the CPRB to spend beyond their 1999 budget.
F22
Page 97
Last year, the CPRB held a public hearing on the topic of racial profiling. This hearing was broadcast on Community TV.
F23
Page 97
In recent years, fewer complaints at the Santa Cruz City Police Department is attributed by the chief of police as a result of increased departmental training efforts, including mental health, homeless resource and social issues training. Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
F24
Page 98
The CPRB members are citizens who may not be experienced in police practice and procedures. The CPRB training involves a mandated CPRB orientation and ride-alongs with police personnel.
F25
Page 98
Originally, the board had to complete their portion of the investigation review within 30 days. Since the board only meets once a month, they want to increase their review of a complaint from 30 days to 60 days. After the Grand Jury interview, it was discovered that the timeline may now be extended when the CPRB coordinator contacts the city manager.
F26
Page 98
The CPRB Chairperson corresponded to the city council. In this document, the CPRB stated that they would like to see the following changes: • Improve officer cooperation in reviewing complaints • Improve ability to gain complainant cooperation • Allow public release of reasons for exoneration of the police officer
F27
Page 98
Since the establishment of the CPRB, the Internal Affairs investigation reports have increased from a typical 5-page report to a possible 25-page report. These reports must now be written in laymen’s terms for the CPRB members, rather than police terminology. Conclusions The number of complaints made to the Santa Cruz City Police Department is extremely low. The existing training provided to CPRB members does not involve adequate training in the Police Department’s practices and procedures. An established procedure is in place at the Santa Cruz Police Department to investigate citizen complaints and an additional level of review increases the complaint resolution time. The chief of police is not bound by the recommendations of the CPRB but agrees with their findings in most cases. A review board has the potential to provide a new perspective and serve as a checks and balances on the police department’s complaint review process. Page84 Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
Recommendations 17
-
R1Page 90The CPRB and the Police Department should examine the complaint review procedures and streamline the process. The CPRB should prioritize the complaints by their gravity and be allowed discretion over those complaints it investigates. Currently, each and every complaint is reviewed.
-
R2Page 91The Santa Cruz City Council should research police review boards in other jurisdictions to study beneficial working relationships between the police department and the citizen police review boards.
-
R3Page 146may also apply to local policies and practices followed by Santa Cruz LAFCO. As noted in our response to the findings, we believe that complex public issues deserve a thorough public debate. At this time we are not scheduling any tasks to streamline the local process. If the Grand Jury has any specific suggestions, we would be happy to discuss the feasibility and advisability of streamlining the local process. Again, the Grand Jury is to be commended for its detailed review of how the annexation process was conducted for the Manabe-Burgstrom annexation. Responses to the 1999-2000 Grand Jury Final Report 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report Criminal Justice Committee Reports Blain Street Women’s Facility - Respondent: Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors Response Received: September 26, 2000 Respondent: Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office Response Received: September 26, 2000
-
R4Page 91Training for the CPRB members should be improved and address the findings of inadequacy in the knowledge of the police policies and procedures.
-
R5Page 91The Citizen Comment Brochure should be made available on the CPRB and the Santa Cruz City Police Department’s respective web sites.
-
R6Page 91The city should instruct all employees to make themselves available to meet alone with the Grand Jury without the need for approval by any city employee, elected city official or member of the city council.
-
R7Page 91The city should review the adequacy of its general fund reserve.
-
R8Page 91Next year’s Grand Jury should review the operations of the MBAIF. See the City of Capitola’s fiscal year 2000-01 financial statements, pages 38-39, footnote IV. Response Required Entity Recommendations Respond Within Capitola City Council 1 – 7 90 Days Responses to the 1999-2000 Grand Jury Final Report 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report City of Scotts Valley
-
R9Page 91Supply the trial balance for 6-30-99 and 6-30-98.
-
R10Page 91Supply a complete chart-of-accounts for your financial system.
-
R11Page 91Supply the Budget for the current fiscal year. A separate line-item budget should be submitted if the Budget is not that detailed.
-
R12Page 92Supply the Budget for the prior fiscal year.
-
R13Page 92Supply a list of departments, entities and trust funds that are under your control or supervision.
-
R14Page 92Supply a list of the audits (both internal/external and financial/operational) performed by or for you for the last three years sorted by department/entity. The list should state: The department/entity/trust the audit was done for, the type of audit performed, the date the audit started and the date of the audit was completed.
-
R15Page 92Supply a list of the departments/entities/trusts not audited in the last three years and the reason that no audit was performed. Financial Compliance Review of County Entities 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report Exhibit B: Information Requested from Special Districts:
-
R16The General Plan and the code compliance complaint status should be available the internet.
-
R17The following should be added to the web site: • Development approval process • Description of the project • Cross reference to a related building permit • Building permit process • The alpha digit at the end of the permit number is confusing and should not be part of the record number • If a permit has been issued, the status on the web page should not show “READY TO ISSUE” • Withdrawn permits should be shown on the web page • Complete projects should show the date of completion on the web page • Cross reference the building permit to any related development approval
Conclusions 49
-
CL1Political pressures from Board of Supervisors
-
CL2Stressful situations for employees who have to tell people what they cannot do with their property Each part of this cycle interacts with another and produces an unstable workforce and a dysfunctional department. Santa Cruz County employee salaries are low relative to housing costs and living expenses in the county. A major contributor to this problem is the nine-county average that is used to determine Santa Cruz County employee salaries. Using the salaries of comparable staff positions in the four cities in the county would be more relevant than counties like Fresno, Napa, Solano or Sonoma. A weighted-average is a better method for calculating benchmark salaries than a simple average. The Planning Department has little control over salaries. Therefore, the problems that plague the Planning Department in regards to employees will continue indefinitely despite their good effort to retain and hire enough new people. Silicon Valley has become a major source of income for a number of Santa Cruz County residents. This has its good and bad points. Since a Silicon Valley employee earns substantially more than a Santa Cruz County employee, Silicon Valley income-earners have driven up the cost of housing in the county. The present salaries of new county employees make it difficult to find affordable housing. This negatively affects recruitment. Review of the Santa Cruz County Planning Department Page 11 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report Training programs for employees are critical to the building of their work skills. The high vacancy rate, which has prevailed within the department, has contributed heavily to the lack of essential training. Political pressure is a way of life for any county’s planning department. Training personnel to deal with this inevitable reality will have the effect of lowering stress and improving morale. The Grand Jury commends the dedicated and loyal Planning Department employees who have persevered during these difficult times. Special thanks go to the employees who cooperated with this review. Development Review Section Conclusions The files selected were completed in a timely manner. They contained sufficient information to understand the decisions that were made in each case. Any deficiencies are not of major significance and can be readily resolved. Building Permit Section Conclusions The files selected were completed in a timely manner. They contained sufficient information to understand the decisions that were made in each case. Any deficiencies are not of major significance and can be readily resolved. Code Compliance Section Conclusions Code A complaints (highest priority involving immediate threat to public health and safety) were not given the high priority indicated by the department’s own policies. One year after the complaint filing date 60% were still unresolved. The failure to promptly resolve serious code violations (Code A) creates circumstances of undue risk of serious injury or death. Code compliance files that are incomplete result in inefficiency. Proper use of the current ALUS code compliance system will accomplish the goal of screening out the old files with a few minor changes. This result can be attained by
-
CL3Adding a new status type
-
CL4Considering the new status type the same as a closed complaint
-
CL5Removing the closed files from all computer reports that show active complaints
-
CL6Keeping the history in the computer
-
CL7Changing all old complaints without health or safety problems to the new status type Relying on a new code compliance computer system as an excuse for not reducing the number of code compliance complaints is unacceptable. Code A-C verses 1-5 should not be an excuse for inaction. Although the department has defined its problems and designed initiatives to help correct the code compliance issues, the department is unable to get beyond the planning stage and implement the policies. Page 12 Review of the Santa Cruz County Planning Department 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report It would be very beneficial to have the code compliance status on the internet for the following reasons:
-
CL8The department would receive fewer calls and visits, which will increase efficiency
-
CL9The department would have a greater incentive to reduce outstanding code compliance complaints Systems and Policies Conclusions Inability to accept credit cards is a disservice to the public. This simple reform would do much to improve public relations and reduce the frustration of the employees. The cost savings of personnel time and the convenience to the citizens would justify the cost. Since almost anyone can enter information into the computer, there is a potential for personal gain, collusion or errors. The department or the Auditor-Controller’s Office should consider installing an internal audit system, randomly picking both closed and open files to review. The web sites for both the development approval process and the building permit process are an excellent source of information to the public. Obtaining a new computerized planning system, currently used by other planning departments in the state, has the potential to reduce personnel costs. Further benefits include:
-
CL10Easy and flexible report writing module
-
CL11Easy way to update internet screens using the data stored in the system
-
CL12Consecutive numbering of the code compliance complaints in order of receipt
-
CL13Prevent a file from advancing to the next stage without completion of previous steps
-
CL14A secured ballot box is not utilized at each school.
-
CL15Some parents are eliminated from the voting process by missing an election meeting.
-
CL16Votes returned by students may get lost in transit or misplaced.
-
CL17Voting process should be established in accordance with democratic procedures. Training should be provided annually to the school site councils. School site councils are not adequately publicized. Too much dependence is placed on the school newsletter for communication. Most schools indicated that they had difficulty obtaining new SSC members. Participation greatly contributes to the success of a school site council; therefore, in order to stimulate interest, more creative efforts should be used. While the Education Code provides for specific oversight of school plans, it is ambiguous regarding the structure and organization of school site councils.
-
CL18Regulations attached to each categorical program are unreasonably confining. They create fragmentation of services that contradict accepted principles in the organization of effective medical practice. This fragmentation creates arbitrary hurdles for a family’s ability to follow treatment regimens and undermines continuity of care for all members of a family.
-
CL19Eligibility requirements and processes for tax-supported health programs are confusing and complex. For providers, compliance diverts scarce resources from direct service. For beneficiaries, the complexity of enrollment is a major disincentive to seeking assistance.
-
CL20The Grand Jury commends the accomplishments of the Central Coast Alliance for Health and its principles of practice for improved administration of Medi-Cal and Healthy Families Programs. Some of their successes are highlighted below: • Alliance membership in the Coalition for Health Care Outreach has contributed to the ongoing, community-wide effort to enroll those who are eligible for Medi-Cal and the Healthy Families Program. This strategy of decentralized outreach is especially important to the Spanish-speaking community whose families are not always aware of their eligibility for Medi-Cal or the Healthy Families Program. • Intensive and continuing efforts by community organizations to enroll eligible families in state and federally assisted health care programs channel scarce county funds into the medical care of those unable to qualify. Review of Health Care Services for Low-Income Families in Santa Cruz County Page 73 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report • The local administration of Medi-Cal and the Healthy Families Programs has proven to be more efficient than state administration. For example, total program costs are lower, a higher quality of care has been achieved and services are more accessible and convenient for beneficiaries. • Member’s access to primary health care and on-going health supervision has significantly reduced the cost of medical care. Primary care physicians and on-going health supervision have successfully managed referrals for specialty care and reduced the use of emergency services and admissions to local hospitals. • Administrative costs are kept within reason and dollars devoted to medical care are maximized. Access to a single family physician who is able to assure continuity of care reduces program costs. • Proactive measures in health education and organized prevention contribute to the maintenance of good health. • Recent State surveys indicate high rates of enrollee satisfaction with plan physicians and medical services. Because Medi-Cal enrollees may serve on the MMCC, they advocate policies that are advantageous to the members they represent.
-
CL21Tax-subsidized health insurance limited to poor children without coverage for parents is contrary to the effectiveness of providing primary and preventive care to the entire family.
-
CL22Low reimbursement rates to local hospitals for care to indigent patients tests the ability of hospital administrators to sustain these critical services.
-
CL23The Coalition for Health Care Outreach has become indispensable to the delivery of health services to low-income families and single adults. Its record has demonstrated the essential value of private and public collaboration in a joint effort to improve the health status of people who are vulnerable.
-
CL24There is a pressing need for primary mental health and dental services at county and community clinics and in the county operated prepaid plans. Credentialed mental health professionals can effectively manage common behavioral problems under the guidance of a psychiatrist. Group therapy can be employed to expand access to mental health care. The use of these strategies may eventually improve access to care in the entire community and contribute to an expansion of the pool of mental health professionals available to low- income families.
-
CL25The Health Services Agency is the logical entity to close critical gaps in the local community health care system.
-
CL26To be effective, the complex network of services to low-income persons requires a high level of mutual trust and cooperation between HSA, private providers and collaborating agencies. The Grand Jury commends the efforts of the HSA.
-
CL27The successful recruitment and retention of credentialed health professionals into county service is seriously impaired by the rising costs of housing, goods and services in Santa Cruz County. Page 74 Review of Health Care Services for Low-Income Families in Santa Cruz County 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL28The Medical Information Management System (MIMS), being developed by the County Health Services Agency, is essential to the improvement of its management of health care programs and the refinement of comprehensive health planning and evaluation.
-
CL29The style, reputation and effectiveness of Salud Para La Gente Clinic demonstrates that open access to primary and preventive health services can be both cost effective and compassionate. The Grand Jury commends Salud Para La Gente Clinic for the manner in which they find and enroll eligible families.
-
CL30With his experience in public health dentistry, the Dientes Community Dental Clinic director could be a valuable resource to the County in planning and implementing a full service dental program for Medi-Cal eligible individuals.
-
CL31The ingenuity and commitment of public health nurses in both case finding and referral and their refusal to be intimidated by the rigidity of the rules and regulations attached to categorical health programs are commended by the Grand Jury.
-
CL32Segregation of hospital care for the poor does not exist in Santa Cruz County due to the accommodation of county patients at community hospitals. All participating parties can take credit for this accomplishment which is recognized by this Grand Jury.
-
CL33The growing population of uninsured families in South County is having a major impact on the ability of health care providers to continue to offer high quality health care service.
-
CL34The volunteers for their dedication and time spent on behalf of their communities. Without the volunteers, these centers could not function successfully.
-
CL35The Sheriff’s Service Centers Deputies and volunteers for providing community outreach and proactive crime reduction at the neighborhood level.
-
CL36The Sheriff’s Service Centers Deputies for their efforts in reducing drug and alcohol abuse in teens through the above mentioned programs.
-
CL37Deputy Amy Christey and the Freedom Service Center for establishing the non-profit organization SAL.
-
CL38The city council spent an inordinate amount of time in 2000 discussing and restructuring the reporting relationship of the city manager and finance director that was ultimately returned to its previous state in conformity with Municipal Code. The city council allowed itself to be diverted from crucial city business by the antagonism between these two important city officials, which, in part, led to the resignation of a council member. Instead of using standard government practices to resolve a formal personnel grievance, the city council entered into a contract with one of the parties that contravened its own Municipal Code. A change in the reporting relationship between the city manager and finance director as a quid pro quo agreement for the withdrawal of the grievances presents serious public policy questions. Page 18 Investigation of the Reporting Structure between the Capitol City Council and City Manager 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL39Failure to apply customary purchasing procedures to consultants, professionals, services and supplies, creates a lack of adequate safeguards to prevent mismanagement of funds. When hiring consultants, the board did not request proposals because of their belief that they had to accept the lowest bid received. When there are no written contracts, board member review of all detailed bills is crucial. Over the years, the board has relegated many of their responsibilities to consultants, which results in relinquishing board duties to nonelected persons. The Grand Jury questions the amount of money expended on consultants’ fees for routine administrative and managerial tasks which could have been performed by employees, such as the chief, assistant chief, battalion chiefs, or administrative assistants. Some board members were reluctant to consider knowledge of the Brown Act as their responsibility. Based on letters and the facts available, the Grand Jury concluded tape recordings made by a recording secretary for the board, a district employee seated at the board’s table, was a public document and should have been made available to the public. Lack of by-laws or other documented procedures for the governing board has fostered a dependency on opinions rather than established policy. Investigation of Complaint Concerning the Board of Directors of Central Fire Protection District Page 25 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL40The budgets in some fire protection districts are too small to provide for a paid firefighter staff. Without volunteer firefighters in these areas, there would be inadequate fire protection. Volunteer firefighters as well as paid firefighters should be acknowledged for their valuable service to the community. To comply with the new law requirements of “two-in, two-out” in fighting structure fires, firefighters must wait until additional firefighters arrive at the scene before entering a structure. This increases the possibility of losing a structure or human life if a person is unable to make their presence known to the firefighters.
-
CL41Some incumbent directors demonstrate ill will towards each other that impedes their ability to cooperate. This has had a negative impact on the ability of the district to move ahead with a number of proposed projects, including such simple projects as painting a four square court or hopscotch on asphalt. The lack of a current, comprehensive Policies and Procedures Manual, to which the directors and the general manager adhere, has fostered an atmosphere of extreme animosity at the board meetings. This contributes to endless discussions at board meetings. Updating and editing policies and procedures at meetings of the board of directors is poor utilization of meeting time and is an impediment to handling the business of the district. This approach to updating the policies and procedures has created agendas with an unwieldy amount of unfinished business, most of which is related to changes in policies or procedures. Compilation of updated policies and procedures has been haphazard and there is no way to know what changes have been made. The general manager’s ability to perform is impeded by the lack of an approved job description and the absence of annual performance evaluations. This has intensified the ill will between directors who feel the job is being performed adequately and those who feel it is not. The letter of intent to resign by an incumbent director was made public immediately after election results were posted in November 2000. The Grand Jury questions the timing of this action. This letter states that the general manager withheld knowledge of the incumbent’s intent to resign from the other directors. When this letter was made public, the fact that the general manager had known of the intent to resign was revealed, which gave the appearance of impropriety on the part of both the incumbent director and the general manager. This further undermined the relationship between the general manager and the other directors. Limitation of the public at the podium on any one agenda item has improved the ability of the board to move ahead in meetings.
-
CL42The Santa Cruz County Office of Education has demonstrated leadership for developing a model Homeless K-12 Education Program in California. They have done an outstanding job of assisting homeless children in Santa Cruz County. The Grand Jury applauds Jo Anne Allen for her work in developing this model program. After 12 years in the program, Ms. Allen has become the leading authority and local and national spokesperson on educating homeless children. Her enthusiasm, knowledge, and leadership have played a paramount role in the success of this program. Community agencies helping homeless families in Santa Cruz County deserve credit for their financial and human services support for the County Office of Education and homeless children these last 12 years.
-
CL43The number of complaints made to the Santa Cruz City Police Department is extremely low. The existing training provided to CPRB members does not involve adequate training in the Police Department’s practices and procedures. An established procedure is in place at the Santa Cruz Police Department to investigate citizen complaints and an additional level of review increases the complaint resolution time. The chief of police is not bound by the recommendations of the CPRB but agrees with their findings in most cases. A review board has the potential to provide a new perspective and serve as a checks and balances on the police department’s complaint review process. Page84 Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL44Residents of California benefit from the firefighting work of the Ben Lomond Conservation Camp and the Grand Jury recognizes the value of their hard work. Wards are given a great opportunity to change and improve their lives through the educational and vocational classes offered at the facility.
-
CL45We commend the staff on the number of classes and activities available to the inmates. However, these activities are optional and are, therefore, dependent on the motivation of each inmate.
-
CL46The staff deserves credit for their beneficial influence on the lives of youth through education, discipline, and friendship in an environment free of gang pressures. With the assurance of three meals a day and the opportunities provided by the Juvenile Hall Facility, these young people are given a chance to change and improve their lives.
-
CL47Much needed structural and security improvements have been initiated with grant funds. Since women at the facility are a growing population, a plan needs to be developed and implemented to curb overcrowding. The turnover rate of detention officers needs to be reduced. Kitchen space and storage are inadequate based on the number of meals prepared daily. Review of the Main Jail Page 97 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL48The Grand Jury commends the staff for the extensive vocational and educational programs offered to inmates. The work crews of the minimum-security facility are to be applauded for their efforts that enhance and contribute to the maintenance of county landfills, recreational parks and local beaches. The number of inmates who completed their GED while at the facility is impressive.
-
CL49The financial compliance, including the work of their independent Certified Public Accountant, was clear, complete and well presented. Because the members of the Grand Jury change every year, there is no continuity of membership on the county’s audit committee nor a guarantee that a qualified juror is available to sit. If the two grand jurors are removed from the committee, the board of supervisors should consider appointing members of the community that can participate with more continuity.
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Santa Cruz County
County