Napa County Grand Jury • 2021-2022 • Agency Response
Response to: Final Investigative Report: Napa County Animal Shelter

Napa County*

Published: November 17, 2020 3 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 5 findings

F1 Page 1
Many Angwin residents interviewed stated they did not recall having received notice prior to the Napa County Board of Supervisors' 'yes vote' in favor of keeping Old Howell Mountain Road closed. The Grand Jury is aware that under the Brown Act, no more than 72 hours' notice of any agenda item is required. But depite repeated efforts, the Grand Jury was unable to confirm that even so minimal a notice occurred. Moreover, given the level of local concern about Old Howell Mountain Road, more prominent notice and even the opportunity for a public hearing would have been appropriate. Had this happened, years of concern and confusion could have been avoided. The Acting County Executive Officer disagree with this finding. The item was discussed at two Board of Supervisors' meetings – November 17, 2020 and December 8, 2020. Both agendas were posted on Thursday before the Tuesday public meeting. Several other smaller meetings, both before and afterwards, were conducted with interested residents. While those residents may not have liked (and still in cases continue to not like) the decision, the rationale for the decision has been clearly communicated and the residents have had the opportunity to voice their concerns. The Board of Supervisors agrees with the Acting County Executive Officer.
No recommendations for this finding
F2 Page 1
These resident believe that they did not receive an explanation of why Old Howell Mountain was not repaired and they were not adequately represented in the decision-making process. The Acting County Executive Officer disagrees with this finding. Again, two public meetings were held to discuss the closure in addition to a number of meetings held in Angwin where there was an opportunity to discuss the status the Old Howell Mountain. Also see response to Finding 1 above. The Board of Supervisors agrees with the Acting County Executive Officer.
No recommendations for this finding
F3 Page 1
The residents of Angwin have been impacted multiple times by evacuations due to wildfires and want to have as many evacuation routes as possible, to avoid a tragedy like Paradise, California scenario. The Acting County Executive Officer agree with this finding. Attached is the current map identifying evacuation routes prepared by CalFire. The Board of Supervisors agrees with the Acting County Executive Officer.
No recommendations for this finding
F4 Page 1
The Napa County board of Supervisors caused unnecessary mistrust in their local government by not sufficiently communicating with Angwin-area residents regarding the closure of Old Howell Mountain Road. The Acting County Executive Officer disagree with this finding. Multiple meetings were held regarding the closure of Old Howell Mountain Road. Also see response to Finding 1 above. The Board of Supervisors agrees with the Acting County Executive Officer.
No recommendations for this finding
F5 Page 2
Multiple agencies, including, Napa County Office of Emergency Services, Napa County Public Works, CalFire, Napa County Fire Department and local construction companies have deemed the road unrepairable, due to a nearly three-mile long section of unstable ground and other hazards; however the Napa County Office of Emergency Services and the Napa County Board of Supervisors did not effectively communicate to the public their reasons for their decision not to repair the road. The Acting County Executive Officer disagree with this finding. Multiple meetings were held and the reasons for not doing the repair were discussed. The Grand Jury did not interview the Risk Manager/Emergency Services Officer. The Board of Supervisors agrees with the Acting County Executive Officer.
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.