Yolo County Grand Jury • 2022-2023

2022-23 Yolo Grand Jury Final Consolidated Report

Published: June 26, 2023 152 pages Consolidated Report
View Original PDF

Findings 8 findings

F1
Each school district has implemented school hardening measures to some degree in addition to those discussed in the 2019-20 Yolo County Grand Jury report. The measures in place at school sites vary and can be improved. While some schools in each district have their sites enclosed or have security cameras, others do not. Fences may not be high enough to prevent students or intruders from jumping over them. In addition, gates at schools are sometimes not closed, locked or are in disrepair.
F2
Each school district conducts California Healthy Kids Surveys, while some use additional methods for assessing student mental health. The response rate of students completing such surveys, however, may not be enough to generate reliable conclusions about student mental health.
F3
California Education Code mandates that all school districts require visitors to go to a school’s office upon arrival and wear identification while on site. At some Yolo County schools, however, the location of the school’s office is not clear. Better signage is needed to direct visitors to the office. This is particularly important for schools, such as in the Davis, Winters and Woodland school districts, where sharing open space or parking lots can make clear signage and prevention of intruders from entering school grounds more challenging.
F4
A computerized grievance and tracking system is still not implemented nor can a final implementation date be determined at this time. Maintaining such a system could increase 1 7 Meeting Their Obligations? A Report on Yolo County Detention Facilities FINAL 06-6-2023 trust in the system as well as allow trends to be identified and studied so problems can be remedied appropriately.
F5
The Esparto and Woodland school districts have assessed the effectiveness of their school safety training through surveys, as recommended by the 2019-20 Yolo County Grand Jury, while Davis, Washington and Winters districts have not. Assessing effectiveness based on quantifiable data can provide more accurate guidance for decisions about training.
F6
Each school district has contracted with a web-based third-party provider to notify parents of emergencies. The providers report on how many parents or guardians were reached per technology (e.g., email, text, app, or voice/phone). All school districts’ providers, except Washington, reach 90% or more of their students’ parents or guardians. Ensuring that virtually all parents or guardians can be reached when needed is desirable. 13 2022-2023 Yolo County Grand Jury Are We There Yet? On the Road to School Safety FINAL 6.1.23
F7
Some high school students in the Davis, Esparto, Winters and Woodland school districts are allowed to go off campus during lunch break. Should an emergency arise on campus, it is not possible for the schools to know how safe those students are, and the students may not receive timely emergency notifications if their school is on lockdown or evacuated. RECOMMENDATIONS
F8
Community resources for child abuse prevention and intervention services essential to family preservation are inadequate, especially for a racially and culturally diverse client base. Keeping Families Together RECOMMENDATIONS The Yolo County Grand Jury recommends the following:

Recommendations 8

Commendations 11

No Responses Found 4

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Esparto Unified School District School District
Woodland Joint Unified School District School District
Yolo County Office of Education Agency
Yolo County Sheriff Elected County Office