📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

San Bernardino County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

County of SAN Bernardino Grand Jury

Published: June 30, 2010 50 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings and Recommendations 4 findings

F1 Page 62
Language used throughout the ICCM is more “advisory” than “directory” with no presence of giving command resulting in varied response from management to the findings of the auditors. The 2008-2009 Grand Jury had recommended that the language in the ICCM Manual be revised. Ambiguous language results in differing interpretations and therefore differing responses. The ACR had agreed with the recommendation with the changes scheduled to be included in the next revision of the Manual in June 2010. An introductory paragraph would also be included stressing that the Manual is not a guide, but a requirement that must be followed.
Related Recommendations (2)
R10-29
Page 63
The ACR comply with the response to the 2008-2009 Grand Jury recommendations and revise the language in the ICCM. Replacing the words should and must with the word will results in a document that is more commanding than instructional and provides clearer direction to management and staff. (Finding 1)
R10-30
Page 63
The ACR follow up with its commitment to an introductory paragraph explaining that the ICCM is not a guide, but a requirement that must be followed with non-compliance resulting in reports to the Board of Supervisors, County Administrative Office and the Grand Jury as is the current practice. (Finding 1)
F2 Page 62
The six month follow-up audit called for in the November 2009 audit may be extended for a few months to give the Library time to work on changes being implemented at the recommendation of the County Administrative Office (CAO).
No recommendations for this finding
F3 Page 62
Audit recommendations need to be responded to in the appropriate manner with suitable oversight. This corresponds to a 2008-2009 Grand Jury
Related Recommendations (1)
R10-31
Page 63
The Board of Supervisors and the County Administrative Office enforce the implementation of ACR audit recommendations by overseeing and following-up on compliance. (Finding 3)
F4 Page 62
The Library anticipates a reduction in actual cash handling over the next several years thus reducing its risk due to the implementation of the PayPal system. This system allows for payment of library fines and fees from either one’s home PC or at a library computer. 2009-2010 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report 48
No recommendations for this finding

Commendations 3

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

San Bernardino City