📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Shasta County Grand Jury • 2020-2021

2019-20 0 Shasta County

Published: July 01, 2020 28 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 16 findings

F1 Page 15
Fire fuel management for the prevention of wildfires in Shasta County has vegetation treatment and pile burning. The project is designed to protect Happy not been a top priority for far too long, due to lack of funding, and limited man- Valley, Redding, Anderson and Igo. power leading to a higher risk for the well-being of Shasta County. On the heels of the Carr Fire, California enacted Senate Bill 901 (SB901) in
F2 Page 15
Fire Fuel management is an ongoing process that requires maintenance of September of 2018. The bill requires utilities to prepare wildfire mitigation previously completed projects so regrowth remains manageable. measures, by January 2020, where over- head power lines are located in high risk wildfire areas. The City of Redding and Redding Electrical Utility (REU)
F3 Page 15
Shasta County Fire Department is unable to thoroughly identify defen- reacted by setting aside 8 million dollars, over the next four years, for the Fire sible space and fire fuel management infractions due to understaffing. Absentee Fuel Management work. Details of the initiative can be found in REU’s 2019 landowners and non-complying landowners stretch the limited law enforce- Wildfire Mitigation Plan, which was adopted by the Redding City Council on ment officers’ resources. December 3, 2019.
F4 Page 15
A structure in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) has an improved chance In 2018, the City of Anderson enacted Ordinance 2018-01, Exterior Hazard of withstanding, or not igniting a wildfire when defensible space requirements Abatement Program, which addresses the minimum abatement standards. The are practiced. ordinance deals mostly with a 100-foot defensible space and fire fuel manage- ment on private property and demanding similar requirements as described
F5 Page 15
There are elderly, disabled and other at-risk people living in the WUI who above in the defensible space narrative. Additionally, five acre and larger prop- need physical or financial assistance to achieve a proper defensible space and erties are required to have a series of fire breaks at designated locations, 15 decrease their personal risk as well as risk to their neighbors. to 60 feet in width, disked or kept mowed at a height of three inches or less. Anderson has coined itself a “Fire-wise Community”, and is actively making
F6 Page 12
Voting machine results are accurate because of the initial program checks, many data checks against known results, the security provided, and the mul- R5. The Shasta County Elections Office shall continue monitoring DMV voter tiple tabulations of votes on isolated servers which includes a random hand registration until the types of errors experienced to date are eliminated. DMV count. registrations thereafter shall be vetted as are all other voter registrations.
F7 Page 12
Polling operations and tabulation of election data are efficient and accurate R6. The Shasta County Elections Office shall assure that all efforts to maintain partly because of the detailed training required and provided by the Shasta completely accurate election results continue. County Elections Department.
F8 Page 12
Due to the extensive checking that is done, there are no known massive or its current level. pervasive voting irregularities in Shasta County. While fraudulent/extra votes are theoretically possible, they are few and have not caused problems or raised R8. The Shasta County Elections Office shall continue to monitor and be alert questions in any final tabulations. for current and newly created types of voter fraud.
F9 Page 12
The entire vote tabulation process has been made very efficient by the per- R9. The Shasta County Elections Office shall continue to be proactive in fore- sonnel in the Elections Office due to their job dedication and a proactive ap- seeing and solving problems in the voting and voting tabulation processes. proach to continual improvement.
F10 Page 12
Errors in ballot measure titles and/or summaries, such as occurred with presented to the voters are absolutely correct. Measure A in the November 2019 election, can mislead voters, causing some to not vote the way they intend. REQUIRED RESPONSES
F11 Page 17
CAL FIRE – Returning home after a Wildfire – Pamphlet DEFENSIBLE SPACE (DS): The buffer created between a building and the 12. SCFD/CDF/Shasta County Sheriff’s Office - Shasta County Wildfire grass, trees, shrubs or any wildland area that surrounds it. Evacuation Plan – Shingletown
F12 Page 23
The Correctional Officers training and continuing education are above the STC requirements. Grand Jury Report -23- July 1, 2020
F13 Page 24
Excessive use of force by Correctional Officers is not used as a form of • Shasta County Board of Supervisors: F1, F4, F10, F11, F15 and R1, punishment against inmates. If unauthorized excessive force is used, jail staff R3, R5, R6, R8, R9, R10 are disciplined and held accountable. From the following elected county officer (within 60 days) • Shasta County Sheriff: F1 through F13 and R1 through R5, R7, R10
F14 Page 24
Due to a cumbersome website platform, the CGL Report was not readily available to the public leading to an appearance of lack of transparency sur- GLOSSARY rounding the status of the jail facility. California Assembly Bill 109 (AB109)- Enacted in 2011, Realignment AB
F15 Page 24
Although the deadline was September 30, 2019 for CGL to issue a final 109 transfers responsibility for supervising certain kinds of felony offenders report on Jail Op- erations to the BOS, this Grand Jury has found no evidence and state prison parolees from state prisons and state parole agents to county of a final report being submit- ted to the BOS. jails and probation officers. Crime statues amended by realignment are classi- fied as non-serious, non-violent and non-sex related.
F16 Page 24
Although the deadline was September 30, 2019 for the Sheriff’s Office to present the BOS with a plan for implementation of the recommendations set California Proposition 47- forth in the CGL report, none could be located. Proposition 47 implemented three broad changes to felony sentencing laws. First, it reclassified certain theft and drug possession offenses from felonies to

Recommendations 13