Orange County Grand Jury
• 2007-2008
• Agency Response
Response to:
Newport-Mesa Unified School District
Are Charter Schools Getting Passing Grades*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F2
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
F1
parents and pupils a choice in educational opportunities, emphasizing specific learning experiences, and aiding at-risk or academically low-achieving students. We agree with this finding. We are aware of the Education Code and its outlined Response: purpose of charter schools. The number of charter schools in Orange County is not growing commensurate with the overall -2: growth of charter schools in California. We agree with this finding. Newport-Mesa offers a variety of alternative Response: education programs for our students as do many Orange County school districts. Parents continue to express satisfaction with their public schools which could be a factor counter balancing the growth of charters in some areas. Additionally, many Orange County schools are experiencing a decline in student enrollment in certain areas.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Orange County school districts and Orange County Superintendent of Schools continue to offer expanded choices for educational opportunities, as required in the State Education Code, by utilizing charter schools as an option to provide additional choices, especially for at-risk and academically low-achieving students. We agree with the finding. We uphold the provisions of the Education Code and Response: individually evaluate every charter request against the approval criteria provided in state law, regulations and case law. \mathbb{R}-2: The chartering authorities should follow the intent of the legislature by encouraging the establishment of charter schools by granting more charter school petitions provided they meet the State requirements. We agree with the finding. We evaluate each charter petition against the Response: approval criteria provided in state law, regulations and case law. To date, the charter proposals submitted to N-MUSD have not met the criteria necessary to obtain Board approval. One proposal was appealed to the Orange County Department of Education and the California Department of Education. Both agencies denied the petitioners appeal. |R-3|: Local school districts provide adequate oversight of charter schools even though State law does not allow for full reimbursement for such oversight. We agree with this finding, however, there are no charter schools within Response: Newport-Mesa's boundaries for us to properly gauge this issue with our own experiences. A copy and an electronic format of these responses are being mailed separately to the Orange County Grand Jury. Respectfully, Jeffrey Hubbard, Ed.D. Superintendent . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
F3
The Orange County school districts' oversight costs, in some districts, exceed the authorized 1% reimbursement. We agree with this finding, however, there are no charter schools within Response: 1. Newport-Mesa's boundaries for us to properly gauge this issue with our own experiences. RECOMMENDATIONS
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.