Orange County Grand Jury
• 2011-2012
• Agency Response
Responses to Findings Finding 2 F2: Content & Clarity Ratings for Executive Compensation Cost City Response: Based upon*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F2
F2: Content & Clarity Ratings for EXECUTIVE Compensation Cost City Response: Based upon the provided example in Appendix D, the City agrees with the Grand Jury's finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
(R2): Content & Clarity Ratings for EXECUTIVE Compensation Costs The Grand Jury recommends that each of the forty-one of the fifty-seven Orange County cities, districts and joint power authority that were rated less than excellent for their Content & Clarity for their Executive and Elected Officials compensation costs page upgrade their Executive Compensation page.
F3
F3: Content & Clarity Ratings for EMPLOYEE Compensation Cost City Response: Based upon the provided example in Appendix D, the City agrees with the Grand Jury's finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
(R3): Content & Clarity Ratings for EMPLOYEE Compensation Costs The Grand Jury recommends that the County of Orange and all Orange County cities, districts and joint power authority that were rated less than excellent for their Content & Clarity for their Executive and Elected Officials compensation costs page upgrade their Employee pages.
F4
F4: Transparency of Employer Pension Contribution Rates City Response: The City agrees with the Grand Jury's finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
(R4): Transparency of Employer Pension Contribution Rates The Grand Jury recommends that the all Orange County cities, districts and joint power authority, as well as the County of Orange, post their employer pension annual contribution rates prominently and transparently on their website
F5
F5: Transparency of Overtime Pay and On-Call Pay in Employee Compensation Cost Reporting City Response: The City disagrees wholly with the Grand Jury's finding. The City is required to post fiscal year information. Therefore, it provides fiscal year budgeted costs for salaries and benefits. Budgeted overtime costs are not reported because it is not budgeted at the individual level, rather at the department/division level. It is almost impossible to post overtime costs for individual positions based on fiscal year. 2011-2012 Grand Jury Report Compensation Study of Orange County Cities |
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.