Score: +10 (13/8/3)
Monterey County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

Project Bella

47 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 15 findings

F1
Inspired by the prospect of significant revenue for the City, the project was pursued without due diligence.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Committing City funds without having done an investigation of the developer, without adequate deposits and without a firm contract for reimbursement, exposed the City to a potential liability of several hundred thousand dollars.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The City of Pacific Grove should hold “lessons learned” sessions with a facilitator skilled in municipal operations, to critique the Project Bella experience in order to avoid making the same mistakes in future developments.
F3
A lack of transparency contributed to the public criticisms and allegations of financial malfeasance. 16
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
The City of Pacific Grove should hold “lessons learned” sessions with a facilitator skilled in municipal operations, to critique the Project Bella experience in order to avoid making the same mistakes in future developments.
R8
The City of Pacific Grove should develop a policy to improve the transparency of its communication with its citizens.
F4
The lack of clearly defined systems and procedures that were consistently followed contributed to public criticism of the City administration.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
The City of Pacific Grove should hold “lessons learned” sessions with a facilitator skilled in municipal operations, to critique the Project Bella experience in order to avoid making the same mistakes in future developments.
R7
The City of Pacific Grove should develop a comprehensive policies and procedures manual that clearly describes the duties of all employees.
F5
The allegation that $50,000 of City funds had been misappropriated resulted from the City’s failure to correctly record a check for that amount that was paid for Project Bella by David Armanasco. This allegation was shown to be incorrect.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The City lacked adequate procedures to account for employee time by project.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The City of Pacific Grove should develop procedures that would track employee time by project.
F7
The City lacked adequate procedures to track documents.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The City of Pacific Grove should develop procedures that would enable document tracking.
F8
A lack of appropriate controls on the part of the City administration contributed to unreimbursed costs of more than $101,402.47 to the City.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
In the Jury’s opinion, it appears that Mr. Harvey had an advantage in competing for the position of City Manager.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
In the Jury’s opinion, the City Manager, Mr. Harvey, displayed a lack of sensitivity to the appearance of a conflict of interest created by joining Jared Ficker’s group membership in Surf Air.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The City Council should review and revise Mr. Harvey’s employment contract to clearly spell out the limits of his travel allowance. 17
R3
There should be a sunset date for the reimbursement for Mr. Harvey’s personal travel to Southern California.
F11
Mr. Harvey’s relationship with members of the Domaine organization resulted in an allegation that he was receiving gifts from Domaine.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Mr. Harvey did not receive the membership in Surf Air from Domaine, as was alleged in a citizen complaint.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Mr. Harvey did not pay for Surf Air for two separate three-month periods.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The City Council should review and revise Mr. Harvey’s employment contract to clearly spell out the limits of his travel allowance. 17
R3
There should be a sunset date for the reimbursement for Mr. Harvey’s personal travel to Southern California.
F14
The cost of Mr. Harvey’s flights to Southern California on Surf Air was substantially greater than the average cost would have been for commercial flights.
Related Recommendations (3)
R2
The City Council should review and revise Mr. Harvey’s employment contract to clearly spell out the limits of his travel allowance. 17
R3
There should be a sunset date for the reimbursement for Mr. Harvey’s personal travel to Southern California.
R4
Travel of City of Pacific Grove employees should be reimbursed at the lowest practical cost.
F15
The April 19, 2016 re-zoning allows for hotel use at the American Tin Cannery site in the future.
No recommendations for this finding

Conclusions 2

Agency Responses 2

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.