⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 15 findings
F1
Inspired by the prospect of significant revenue for the City, the project was pursued without due diligence.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Committing City funds without having done an investigation of the developer, without adequate deposits and without a firm contract for reimbursement, exposed the City to a potential liability of several hundred thousand dollars.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The City of Pacific Grove should hold “lessons learned” sessions with a facilitator skilled in municipal operations, to critique the Project Bella experience in order to avoid making the same mistakes in future developments.
F3
A lack of transparency contributed to the public criticisms and allegations of financial malfeasance. 16
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
The City of Pacific Grove should hold “lessons learned” sessions with a facilitator skilled in municipal operations, to critique the Project Bella experience in order to avoid making the same mistakes in future developments.
R8
The City of Pacific Grove should develop a policy to improve the transparency of its communication with its citizens.
F4
The lack of clearly defined systems and procedures that were consistently followed contributed to public criticism of the City administration.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
The City of Pacific Grove should hold “lessons learned” sessions with a facilitator skilled in municipal operations, to critique the Project Bella experience in order to avoid making the same mistakes in future developments.
R7
The City of Pacific Grove should develop a comprehensive policies and procedures manual that clearly describes the duties of all employees.
F5
The allegation that $50,000 of City funds had been misappropriated resulted from the City’s failure to correctly record a check for that amount that was paid for Project Bella by David Armanasco. This allegation was shown to be incorrect.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The City lacked adequate procedures to account for employee time by project.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The City of Pacific Grove should develop procedures that would track employee time by project.
F7
The City lacked adequate procedures to track documents.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The City of Pacific Grove should develop procedures that would enable document tracking.
F8
A lack of appropriate controls on the part of the City administration contributed to unreimbursed costs of more than $101,402.47 to the City.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
In the Jury’s opinion, it appears that Mr. Harvey had an advantage in competing for the position of City Manager.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
In the Jury’s opinion, the City Manager, Mr. Harvey, displayed a lack of sensitivity to the appearance of a conflict of interest created by joining Jared Ficker’s group membership in Surf Air.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The City Council should review and revise Mr. Harvey’s employment contract to clearly spell out the limits of his travel allowance. 17
R3
There should be a sunset date for the reimbursement for Mr. Harvey’s personal travel to Southern California.
F11
Mr. Harvey’s relationship with members of the Domaine organization resulted in an allegation that he was receiving gifts from Domaine.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Mr. Harvey did not receive the membership in Surf Air from Domaine, as was alleged in a citizen complaint.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Mr. Harvey did not pay for Surf Air for two separate three-month periods.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
The City Council should review and revise Mr. Harvey’s employment contract to clearly spell out the limits of his travel allowance. 17
R3
There should be a sunset date for the reimbursement for Mr. Harvey’s personal travel to Southern California.
F14
The cost of Mr. Harvey’s flights to Southern California on Surf Air was substantially greater than the average cost would have been for commercial flights.
Related Recommendations (3)
R2
The City Council should review and revise Mr. Harvey’s employment contract to clearly spell out the limits of his travel allowance. 17
R3
There should be a sunset date for the reimbursement for Mr. Harvey’s personal travel to Southern California.
R4
Travel of City of Pacific Grove employees should be reimbursed at the lowest practical cost.
F15
The April 19, 2016 re-zoning allows for hotel use at the American Tin Cannery site in the future.
No recommendations for this finding
Conclusions 2
-
CL1Inspired by the prospect of significant revenue for the City, the project was pursued without due diligence.
-
CL2The Jury does not doubt that the City entered into Project Bella with the best of motivations. However, inspired by the prospect of significant revenue for the City, the project was pursued without due diligence. Ultimately, the only positive result of this project was a zoning change at the ATC site which significantly increased the value of the location. This was at a cost to the city of a minimum of $101,402.47. A new project for a luxury hotel at the ATC site in the future is still a possibility. If the City is able to identify and incorporate the lessons learned from Project Bella, such a project has every possibility of succeeding. Proposed Site of Project Bella 35 “ ICMA Code of Ethics with Guidelines “The ICMA Code of Ethics was adopted by the ICMA membership in 1924, and most recently amended by the membership in June 2017. 14 FACTS (1) November 9, 2015: Notice of an incomplete application to develop the American Tin Cannery site at 125 Ocean View Blvd, Pacific Grove was provided by the Community Economic Development Department to Domaine Pacific Grove LLC. (2) Domaine had 180 days from November 9, 2015 to submit revised plans or the project would be considered withdrawn. (3) Domaine never submitted a complete application which was required for construction of Project Bella. (4) The application fee of $11,044.20 due from Domaine was never received by the City of Pacific Grove. (5) At the commencement of the project, the City failed to follow standard procedure by not requiring a substantial deposit from the developer to cover the City’s project expenses. (6) After the City Manager announced his resignation, Mr. Ficker recommended Mr. Harvey to fill the position of City Manager. (7) January 4, 2016: Ben Harvey began work as an independent contractor. (8) January 20, 2016: Ben Harvey began work as Interim City Manager. (9) January 20, 2016: The City Council approved an agreement for Domaine to reimburse the City for the cost of the special election for a zoning change necessary for Project Bella. (10) January 27, 2016: Mr. Harvey joined a membership group in Surf Air’s private air travel organization. (11) The group membership was owned by Jared Ficker, a friend of Mr. Harvey. (12) Mr. Ficker was also an associate of Ronald Meer who was the president and CEO of Domaine and a member of the Surf Air group. (13) February 17, 2016: The City Council authorized the interim City Manager to enter into a master reimbursement agreement with Domaine which included reimbursing for City staff time. (14) February 17, 2016: In the same City Council meeting the Economic Development Director reported that an estimated $35,000 of City staff time had been devoted to Project Bella. (15) The Jury found no evidence in the City’s documents of a tracking system for staff time. 15 (16) The jury found no evidence that the City had billed Domaine for staff time devoted to Project Bella. (17) April 19, 2016: City of Pacific Grove Special Election approved rezoning the ATC parcel for hotel use. (18) April 20, 2016: Ben Harvey hired as permanent City Manager. (19) June 4, 2016: The City and Domaine signed a second reimbursement agreement that was not presented to the City Council for approval. (20) August 11, 2016: A letter from Jason Letterer, attorney for Domaine, contained Domaine’s offer to reimburse the City for a portion of its Local Coastal Plan costs. (21) Early August, 2016: A $50,000 check from David Armanasco was not properly recorded as a payment for Domaine for more than a month. (22) February 1, 2017: meeting the City Council voted unanimously to no longer seek additional Reimbursement from Domaine for Local Coastal Plan costs. (23) The Jackson Lewis law firm was hired by the City in response to public allegations and criticisms of its decisions and performance. (24) In a City Council meeting, the Jackson Lewis investigator gave a PowerPoint presentation with the conclusion that no evidence of malfeasance had been found. (25) The City of Pacific Grove now has the zoning change that will be necessary for the development of a hotel at the ATC site. (26) The unreimbursed cost of Project Bella to the City has been $101,402.47.
Agency Responses 2
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.