12 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
MRWPCA is responsible for the May 18, 2015, sanitary sewer overflow at Fountain Avenue, Pacific Grove. They own and operate said pump station, and were making repairs there when the overflow occurred.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The MRWPCA agrees the Agency owns and operates the pump station at Fountain Avenue, Pacific Grove and that the sanitary sewer overflow occurred as a result of the Agency's efforts to make repairs to the station on May 18, 2015.
R1
MRWPCA implement staff training to account for and manage situations of false equipment readings.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
below). Joint Powers Authority Member Entities: Boronda County Sanitation District, Castroville Community Services District, County of Monterey, Del Rey Oaks, Fort Ord, Marina Coast Water District, Monterey, Moss Landing County Sanitation District, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, and Seaside.
85 Honorable Mark E. Hood July 13, 2016 141 1 46 Page 2 of 2 Finding F3: Diverting the SSO into the Monterey Bay prevented a costlier and hazardous uncontrolled overflow. MRWPCA's response in dealing with the May 18 SSO was appropriate given the alternative. MRWPCA agrees that the response was appropr...
F2
MRWPCA did not have a procedure to address potential false pressure readings during valve maintenance on May 18, 2015.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
MRWPCA agrees there was not a specific procedure in place to address potential false pressure readings. More importantly, in this situation, staff did not have a procedure to identify that an isolation valve did not properly close and the piping was still pressurized.
R2
The City of Pacific Grove prioritize sewer projects based on severity of pipe degradation and public need.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F3
Diverting the SSO into the Monterey Bay prevented a costlier and hazardous uncontrolled overflow. MRWPCA's response in dealing with the May 18 SSO was appropriate given the alternative.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
MRWPCA agrees that the response was appropriate to prevent a costlier and potentially more hazardous situation given the alternative.
R3
The City of Pacific Grove annually budget for sewer projects using Proposition 218 funds and other funds as they become available.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F4
The condition of PG owned sewer infrastructure was unrelated to the circumstances of the SSO on May18, 2015.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
MRWPCA agrees the condition of PG sewer infrastructure was unrelated to the overflow. All infrastructure involved in the May 18 SSO is owned and operated by MRWPCA.
R4
The City of Pacific Grove actively seek matching funds for the sewer projects.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F5
PG fulfilled its obligation in the Ecological Rights Foundation v. City of Pacific Grove Case #CO3-2612 PVT.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F6
PG has so far only approved projects outlined in the 2014 SSMP when matching funds are available.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F7
Due to rate increases from Proposition 218, PG will have sufficient funds to resolve the sewer infrastructure issues identified in the 2014 SSMP.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F8
PG is sufficiently maintaining its sanitary sewer system through its contracts with Greenline and Root Tamers.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0