Orange County Grand Jury • 2011-2012 • Agency Response
Response to: “Let There Be Light” Dragging Special Districts from the Shadows 4/27/12, 843KB

Let There Fred R. Bockmiller Be Light*

Published: July 10, 2012 9 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F3, F4, F9, F11, F12, F13, F14

Findings and Recommendations 8 findings

F1
Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) have been incapable or unwilling to consolidate, absorb, or eliminate these outmoded and/or redundant agencies. PAUL E. SHOENBERGER, P.E. LAFCO typically addresses larger issues such as merging of cities and elimination General Manager of "islands" within the county. The special districts themselves have not worked COLEEN L. MONTELEONE District Secretary/ seriously toward their consolidation or demise. In this regard, the enterprise Treasurer special districts and the non-enterprise special districts require independent BOWIE, ARNESON,WILES & GIANNONE evaluation and handling. Legal Counsel
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
All special districts (except the Vector Control District and the County Cemetery District) should be eliminated from the county tax rolls and should rely solely on fees or the services of surrounding governments. (See F2, F3, F4, F5, & F6.) 1965 Placentia Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92627 Telephone (949) 631-1200 • FAX (949) 574-1036 www.MesaWater.org ∕vesa Consolidated Nater District July 10, 2012 Grand Jury District Mission: Dedicated to Satisfying our Community's
F2
Special districts have made very little progress in complying with the recommendations made by various governmental agencies. To ensure recommendations are followed, more coordination and cooperation is needed from the city and county agencies. 1965 Placentia Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92627 Telephone (949) 631-1200 • FAX (949) 574-1036 www.MesaWater.org Mesa Consolidated Water District July 10, 2012 Grand Jury District Mission: Dedicated to Satisfying our Community's
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The sixteen enterprise districts typically started as local agricultural irrigation TRUDY OHLIG-HALL Vice President providers and sanitation providers for local communities. These special districts Division III have transitioned into providers of potable water and sewage disposal for the cities that blossomed around them after 1950. These districts grew until their boundaries met a neighboring special district that was also growing. Some of PAUL E. SHOENBERGER, P.E. General Manager these local smaller providers have already been absorbed by larger districts under COLEEN L. MONTELEONE one management. District Secretary/ Treasurer
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Water and sewer districts should be removed from the tax rolls and operate solely on fees and other revenues for their services. Consideration should be given to forming non-profit agencies with ownership shared by the constituents. These districts should meet with county officials before October 31, 2012 to prepare plans and schedules to remove themselves from the county tax rolls. (See F2, F5, & F6.)
F6
The sixteen enterprise special districts of Orange County founded between 1919 Water Needs and 1964 have grown with the urbanization of the county. Thirteen of these special districts rely upon taxes collected by the county while three rely on fees and other sources for their revenue. This suggests that all of these enterprise special districts could wean themselves from tax subsidies and rely on fees for BOARD OF DIRECTORS their revenue. Severance from the tax subsidies would enable financial FRED R. BOCKMILLER transparency and let the customers see the true cost of the services provided. President Division I JAMES R. FISLER
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
Special districts should adopt "board of director's practices" for all their reserves, Water Needs restricted and unrestricted. All reserves should be classified in their 2013-2014 budgets according to GASB Standard No. 54. LAFCO should work with the special districts to prepare standard criteria for accumulating reserves according to the new classifications by December 15, 2012. These standards should be BOARD OF DIRECTORS used in preparing the 2013-2014 budgets. (See F7 & F9.) FRED R. BOCKMILLER President Division I
F7
The unrestricted reserves of the special districts are available to the governing TRUDY OHLIG-HALL Vice President boards to spend as they please. Local citizens are not openly informed of this Division III wealth when agencies ask for fee increases, special assessments, or bond measures. Most of the special districts do not appear to have specific criteria for amassing these reserves nor do they have published long-range plans for their PAUL E. SHOENBERGER, P.E. General Manager constructive use. COLEEN L. MONTELEONE District Secretary/
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
Excessive unrestricted reserves should be used to reduce existing debts. Future Division III revenues should be reduced to avoid the accumulation of unallocated revenue that does not meet the adopted new standards. (See F7 & F8.) PAUL E. SHOENBERGER, P.E.
F8
The twenty-seven special districts in Orange County have amassed unrestricted Water Needs reserves of over $866,000,000. That is enough money to fund all of these special districts for more than year without taxes, fees, interest, or other sources of revenue. The boards of directors have the sole discretion to spend these unrestricted reserves. BOARD OF DIRECTORS FRED R. BOCKMILLER
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
Each special district should have an independent performance audit at least every three years. The executive summary of the performance audit should be distributed to all the taxpayers of each special district. Each of the special districts that has not had a performance audit within the last five years should contract with an independent outside consultant to conduct such an audit during 2012. These audits should be repeated at least every three years. (See FI5.)
F10
The enterprise special districts could save millions of dollars in administration costs by consolidation into regional special districts. Five or six such enterprise special districts within Orange County could save at least $500,000 per year for each special district absorbed.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
Only one of the special districts, The South Coast Water District, has had recent SHAWN DEWANE Vice President performance audits. The lack of performance audits for the remaining special Division V districts leaves the potential for inefficiencies, poor practices, outmoded TRUDY OHLIG-HALL Vice President operations, etc. hidden from the governing boards and the communities they Division III serve. The lack of published performance audits has contributed to the public's ignorance of these districts. PAUL E. SHOENBERGER, P.E.
No recommendations for this finding

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Mesa Water District (Orange) Special District
Orange LAFCO Lafco

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.