📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Madera County Grand Jury • 2024-2025

Graphic Designer Paul Aleman, it Admin Mary Norris, it Asst Admin Cana Marks

Published: ∼ June 30, 2025 14 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 16 findings

F1
The MCGJ finds that the transition of leadership from the Department of Corrections to the Sheriff’s Office has been positive for both staff and inmates at the Madera County Jail.
F2
The MCGJ finds that despite legislative changes and the County’s population growth, the staffing levels at the Jail have remained the same.
F3
The MCGJ finds that building renovations can help support the potential future growth of the Jail population.
F4
The MCGJ finds that employee absenteeism compounds productivity issues. 50
F5
The MCGJ finds that the EHD lacks public transparency and community education efforts.
F6
The MCGJ finds that the EHD does not prioritize housing and homeless encampment complaints.
F7
The MCGJ finds impact on public trust: The irregularities in the business license issuance process harm public trust in city officials and the administration.
F8
The MCGJ finds the Council does not read the findings, recommendations, and City responses to MCGJ reports.
F9
The MCGJ finds the equipment inventory, Exhibit B, is outdated.
F10
The MCGJ finds the cleaning of the solar panels has been paid by SGM from the CapitaI Improvement fund and not the maintenance costs. 154
F11
The MCGJ finds that the Advisory Committee monthly meeting reports are not made available to the Council.
F12
The MCGJ finds insufficient training regarding business license applications and issuance requirements.
F13
The MCGJ finds that the City has repeatedly failed to ascertain or confirm the true identity of SGM’s purported subtenant(s) at the MMGC.
F14
The MCGJ finds that SGM appears to have two subtenants: Smokehouse for the food service, and the undisclosed bar operator GROUP.
F15
The MCGJ finds that the Interim Fire Marshal recommended that the MMGC be brought up to both the ADA requirements and the City Building Code due to serious violations.
F16
The MCGJ finds that the City has failed to ensure that its tenant and subtenants at the MMGC have performed their daily maintenance obligations under the Lease

Recommendations 16

Conclusions 6

Commendations 2

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Madera County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office
Madera County Sheriff Elected County Office