San Bernardino County Grand Jury • 2004-2005

Audit/fiscal Committee The Audit/Fiscal Committee reviewed the operations and functions of the following County

Published: July 06, 2005 12 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F1987, F1988, F1989, F1990, F1991, F1992, F1993, F1994, F1995, F1996, F1997, F1998, F1999, F2000, F2001, F2002

Findings 2 findings

F1986 Page 5
It allows the transfer of an existing Proposition 13 base year value from a former residence to a replacement residence. This benefit is open to homeowners who are at least 55 years old and meet the requirements outlined in the conditions below. If either spouse is over age 55 or disabled, Proposition 60 allows replacement of a primary residence with a new home of equal or lesser value within the same county and transfer of the Prop. 13 assessed valuation from the old home to the new property. Proposition 90 is a State law which allows anyone over age 55 to transfer the value of their property between counties if Prop. 90 is approved by that county’s Board of Supervisors. Only eight counties in the State have opted to adhere to the provisions of Prop. 90. San Bernardino County’s Board of Supervisors has not approved the provisions of Prop. 90. New equipment and software has been acquired by the Assessor’s office that will improve efficiency, accuracy and cost effectiveness of daily operations in the office. The hardware includes 120 new desktop computers, all of which have been deployed and are currently in use. The remainder of the computers are in the process of being distributed and set up. Along with the hardware, the Assessor has purchased a new program, called AES, which deals with comparable sales. This program deals only with the sale of residences, not new construction. Presently, all of the research dealing with comparison values of property must be done manually. The new faster, more accurate program will provide the comparisons automatically. An added benefit is that the same number of workers will be able to handle the growing workload, thus reducing the need to hire more appraisers. The Assessor’s office regularly receives data used for appraisals and assessments from the Recorder’s office. This information must be downloaded and placed into the Assessor’s database. This information includes copies of deeds, ownership records, etc. The establishment of an online, real-time system of sharing this information with these other agencies has been in development and is expected to be completed in the next fiscal year. This would expedite the Assessor’s operations. Such a system would move the department toward its goal of becoming a “paperless” department. The office utilizes the Geographical Information System (GIS) to create Assessor’s parcel maps used in the appraisals and assessments. Overhead high definition imagery from aircraft and satellites would give the department the ability to assess homes throughout the County. An analysis of the workload generated by required audits mandated by State law has shown a requirement for an additional six (6) positions in the Business Division of the Assessor’s office. The plan is to hire lower level staff that can do the routine daily tasks and take the pressure off those State certified auditors qualified to conduct the audits. RECOMMENDATIONS 05-13 PROPOSE TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS THE ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSITION 90 INTO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. 05-14 THE ASSESSOR EMPLOY THE REQUIRED PERSONNEL IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUIRED AUDITS MANDATED BY STATE LAW. AUDITOR/CONTROLLER-RECORDER AND COUNTY CLERK INTRODUCTION The Auditor/Controller-Recorder and County Clerk is an elected office. The mission of the Auditor/Controller-Recorder (ACR) is to provide superior accounting, auditing and recording services in accordance with legal requirements and professional standards. The Audit/Fiscal Committee looked at four areas within the ACR responsibility and each is addressed separately. CONTROLLER DIVISION ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BACKGROUND The Accounts Payable division audits claims then issues and mails warrants (payments) for legal and valid claims, cancels all outdated (stale) warrants and reissues on request, issues stop payments and verifies reported forgeries on County warrants. The Audit/Fiscal Committee investigated this to determine the length of time for payments to be made. FINDINGS The standard for processing payments is ten business days. Standards are not always met. Staff estimates the standards are met 90 percent of the time. Timeline starts when a form comes in and is time-stamped. When it is paid in the Fiscal Accounting System (FAS), it is again date stamped with an ending date. Each desk does not prioritize work by date stamp to meet timelines. An Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT) to an individual’s bank is processed 2 to 3 days after the final date on the documents. The method for assessing the volume of work on an employee’s desk is to use a ruler and measure the width of documents in trays. Attention is paid if the measurement becomes too large. Each desk has a different norm based on the type of work/function performed at that desk. These measurements are included in the Weekly Workload Status Report which is used by the supervisor to give assistance in problem areas. Under the present procedure, it is impossible for a supervisor to come up with a percentage of on-time work using the Weekly Status Report. A complaints log is not maintained in the Accounts Payable Department. Most complaints come in e-mail form, which the supervisor flags. The problem is immediately corrected by the supervisor or directed to the appropriate individual. If the flagged e-mail is not sent back with the corrective action, the supervisor will follow-up at that time to ensure the problem gets resolved. There is no record other than incoming e-mail and subsequent e-mail showing correction. E-mails are not saved. First-line supervision takes all incoming complaints and corrects them. Overtime reports for fiscal years 2003-04, 2002-03 and 2001-02 were not readily available. Overtime is not the first option when Accounts Payable or Data Entry falls behind schedule, as far as processing and posting of payment documents are concerned. At the beginning of the investigation, we were advised that a new accounting system was scheduled for implementation in July 2005. The new system is an on-line system that allows departments to electronically transmit payment requests. The new system will check for errors, thus diminishing, but not eliminating, auditing. However, current information is that the system will not be fully developed until July 2006.
F2003 Page 10
Needed startup procedures, staff turnover and mandated audits caused performance audits to not fully begin until fiscal year 2003-2004. Six performance audits were started during July, 2003-June, 2004. As of November 4, 2005, the reports had not yet been issued. The Auditor will continue to increase the number of performance audits over time to meet the goals set in the Risk-Based Internal Audit Plan, as resources allow. The plan has not been fully implemented. The significant number of mandated audits impacts the ability to conduct periodic performance audits. RECOMMENDATION 05-22 IMPLEMENT THE RISK-BASED INTERNAL AUDIT PLAN IN A MORE TIMELY AND EFFICIENT MANNER RECORDER DIVISION RECORDS MANAGEMENT BACKGROUND The ACR was given responsibility for the Records Management Program on July 1, 2001. In 2001 the County Administrative Office (CAO) did a survey of 33 departments on document retention and found there are 57 different off-site storage areas, with no particular safety or security measures. Each individual department negotiates their own storage contract; therefore the ACR office does not know the location of these facilities. The locations where ACR stores records are: Hall of Records, 222 West Hospitality Lane, San Bernardino; Records Management Center and Central Stores, 777 East Rialto Avenue, San Bernardino; Iron Mountain, 13379 Jurupa Avenue, Fontana. FINDINGS A consultant was contracted at a cost of $74,000 to help ACR employees develop a retention schedule and records management policy for all County departments. The ACR retention schedule is complete. The Treasurer/Tax Collector and the District Attorney have begun to develop their retention schedules. The next two departments to develop their retention schedules will be Human Resources and Information Services. Each department has to determine how long, for what reason and to what extent documents are to be retained. Documents prior to 1992 are now scheduled to be shredded. The County maintains documents and records from as far back as 1853. Original documents from the formation of the County are maintained. Documents that relate to legal obligations and/or custodial issues are required to be maintained. There is no current electronic technology that produces records of archival quality. There are boxes of stored documents in a warehouse on Rialto Avenue. There are plans to move the Archives to a more secure location. Approval from the CAO is needed to move Archives to a different area/building. This will open up approximately 5,000 square feet in the warehouse. The consultant is knowledgeable of all requirements for retention and/or destruction. After the consultant makes recommendations, software systems can be studied. The CAO is requiring each department designate a lead person for records management. The consultant, along with two designated ACR employees, will assist departments with training on records management responsibilities. The two ACR employees have been assigned this project in addition to their regular job duties and are not dedicated to only records management. A new records retention center is needed for the ACR, but a site for that facility has not been selected. The ACR is conducting an assessment of the existing Records Management storage facilities. This will determine if the space requires remodeling or if new construction will be required. The Auditor stated the department is in the initial stages of a lengthy project. To fully implement the project, a building, software, personnel and funding are required. Each County department requires training in records management. The task of Records Management has been a low priority for departments, so it is a challenge for the ACR to change the mind-set of each department. This low priority has caused delays in implementation.

Recommendations 13

No Responses Found 3

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

County of San Bernardino Agency
San Bernardino County Auditor-Controller Elected County Office
San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office