Butte County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
• Agency Response
Response to:
General Services
Board of Supervisors Bill Connelly, Chair First District Administration Center Jane Dolan
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 18 findings
F1
The Department is well managed by three dedicated, highly trained and knowledgeable personnel. A cut in the budget would most likely require a cut in staff. The respondent agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The A-C and the CFO should jointly develop a specific plan for resolving the issues regarding the workioad not transferred fiom the A-C's Ofice to the CFO's Wce. The recommendation has not yet been implemented but will be implemented in the future. Due to budget constraints, it may take two or three years for some duties to completely transfer to the CFO's Office. Meanwhile, staff fiom the CFO, Audiior-Controller, and Treasurer/Tax Collector's Office will continue to work closely to ensure that all the finance duties are properly performed.
F2
The ability of the District to conform to Ambient Air Quality Standards will be diminished unless new sources offinding are found.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The District should continue to educate the public and encourage the voluntary conversion of inefective wood burning devices to EPA certified models. The respondent is unable to comment on these recommendations. Even though the Butte County Board of Supervisors was requested to respond, the recommendations are directed at the Butte County Air Quality District, which is an independent governmental entity. However, it should be noted that all five members of the Butte County Board of Supervisors sit on the goveming board of the Butte County Air Quality District. In its response, the district agrees with the recommendations and reports that it is currently working to implement them. AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S OFFICE Grand Jury Findings FI. A portion of workload scheduled to be transferredfiorn the A-C's Ofice to the CFO 's Ofice has not yet occurred. The respondent agrees with the fmding. Due to the budget constraints and elimination of finance staff, some duties of the Auditor Controller's Office have not been moved to the CFO's Office.
F3
Butte County does not currently meet the federal air quality standard for particulates, due to wood burning devices used in the winter.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Develop a continual cross trainingp rogram and implementation schedule. The respondent is unable to comment on this recommendation since it .is directed to the Auditor-Controller, an elected official.
F4
Butte County does not meet the federal standard for ozone during the summer months, Butte County cannot reduce ozone that is created in another jurisdiction
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Update the division Procedural Manuals. The respondent is unable to comment on this recommendation since it is directed to the Auditor-Controller, an elected official.
F5
The District appears to be well managed by a professionaZ and dedicated stag The respondent is neither agrees nor disagrees with these findings. Even though the Butte County Board of Supervisors was requested to respond, the
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Create andpublish individual desk Procedural Manuals. The respondent is unable to comment on this recommendation since it is directed to the Auditor-Controller, an elected official. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT Grand Jury Findings 4 Fl. There is no plan in place to hire a permanent Director who will reorganize and stabilize BCDBH. The respondent disagrees with tbe finding. The Board intends to find a permanent director of the department in the near future. The Interim Director, meanwhile, has done an admirable job of reorganizing and stabilizing the department.
F6
There is a lack of monitoring and administering of the increased number of contracts. The respondent disagrees with the finding. All contracts are monitored by assigned staff. Assigned staff provide service authorizations, documentation review, training and monitor mental health services contracts. Service providers are included in monthly quality management chart reviews and undergo regular fiscal monitoring, as well as annual cost report reviews. Annual program and service audits conducted by the State regularly include contract providers, as do State fiscal audits.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
A plan andprocess for monitoring contracts should be developed The recommendation bas been implemented.
F7
Productivity levels appear lower than the standard in some areas of BCDBH The respondent agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
Productivity levels need to be established and enforced Qualified medical and clinical supervisors should interface with patients a percentage of the time. A portion of the recommendation will be implemented in the future, and another portion of the recommendation will not be implemented. Currently, productivity levels are being reviewed by a team of line staff, supervisors and managers. This team will make recommendations for adjustments to productivity standards no later than November 30, 2009 and will assist with implementation, including accountability. This will be an on-going effort. The recommendation to set a quota for patient interface for clinical supervisors will not be implemented as it is not warranted. Managers and supervisors will continue to provide backup services as necessary.
F8
There is a lack of contracted residential facilities for youth in crisis in Butte County. The respondent disagrees with the finding. In response to the need for residential facilities for youth in Butte County, a request for proposals was issued. As a result, a local youth residential facility opened in January 2009. The program is still in the implementation phase.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
Additional residential facilities that meet state mandated requirements and licensing qualifications should be encouraged for the purpose of treating and housing youth locally. This would be advantageous to the families involved and save the County a great deal of money. The recommendation has been partially implemented. A local youth residential facility opened in January 2009. The program is still in the implementation phase.
F9
There is a lack of contracted residential facilities fir adults in crisis in Butte County. The respondent disagrees with the finding. In response to the need for residential facilities for adults in Butte County, a request for proposals was issued. As a result, a local adult residential facility opened in April 2009. The program is still in the implementation phase. FlO. There has been a lack of local partnering with a hospital or facility that can hospitalize and treat patients locally. Meetings are being held tof oster partnerships. The respondent disagrees with the finding. The department has held meetings with the key local hospital and law enforcement in December 2008 and April 2009. The department has continued discussions with hospital leadership on 6 increasing acute bed capacity, addressing issues relating to medical emergency service and developing joint projects.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
Additional residential facilities that meet state mandate requirements and licensing qualifications should be developed for *eating and housing adults needing long-term placement locally, again saving out-of-county costs. The recommendation has been partially implemented. A local adult residential facility opened in April 2009. The program is still in the impkmentation phase. RIO. Partnerships with local hospitals in the County need to be developed for the collaborative treatment and care of severely mentally ill patients. This recommendation has been partially implemented. As mentioned earlier, the department has been working with local hospitals and will continue to work with them. RI1 . The classificationp rocess and position allocation for the Systems Performance Evaluation Coordinator should be completed and accepted by the Board of Supervisors as soon as possible. The recommendation has not been implemented but will be implemented in the future. It is anticipated that the Systems Performance Evaluation Coordinator position will approved by the Board of Supervisors by September 30,2009. RI2. Overhead operating costs should continue to be monitored and kept at or below the state requirement level of$fleenpercent to qualifif or state reimbursement. The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted. There is no State requirement limiting overhead operating costs for direct service centers to fifteen percent, nor is it feasible to do so. The administrative Medi-Cal claim, which is sometimes confused with overhead operating costs, is limited to fifteen percent of total Medi-Cal service billings. The administrative claim includes fiscal, personnel, technology and similar s~ppoase rvices and County overhead charges.
F10
There has been a lack of local partnering with a hospital or facility that can hospitalize and treat patients locally. Meetings are being held to foster partnerships. 'The respondent disagrees with this finding. Meetings with the key local hospital and law enforcement were held in December 2008 and April 2009. Discussions with hospital leadership have continued. Talks have included increasing acute bed capacity, addressing some of issues at the medical emergency service, and developing joint projects.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
Consider imerting, in the local phone directory or property assessments, information about emergency travel routes and public assembly points, as shown in
F11
There was a lack of a Systems Perfionnance Evaluation Coordinator in the past. This position has just been assigned and is in the process of classification. The respondent agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
The classification process and position allocation for the Systems Performance Evaluation Coordinator should be completed and accepted by the Board of Supervisors as soon as possible. The recommendation has not been implemented but will be implemented in the future. It is anticipated that the Systems Performance Evaluation Coordinator position will be approved the Board of Supervisors by September 30,2009.
F12
Overhead costs that were too high in relation to the budget have been reduced to qualifi for state reimbursement. The respondent agrees with the finding. The past service rate did exceed the Schedule of Maximum Allowed (SMA) rates. Over the past year, the department has reduced operating costs including the elimination of some management positions, which lowered the department rate to below the SMA. The State has since reduced the SMA in the current State budget. There will be continued focus on the SMA and containing cost that are within department control.
Related Recommendations (1)
R12
Overhead operating costs should continue to be monitored and kept at or below the state requirement level of fifteen percent to qualij. for state reimbursement. The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted. There is no state requirement limiting overhead operating costs for direct service centers to fifteen percent, nor is it feasible to do so. The administrative Medi-Cal claim, which is sometimes confused with overhead operating costs, is limited to fifteen percent of total Medi-Cal service billings. The administrative claim includes fiscal, personnel, technology and similar support services and County overhead charges. The Department continues to monitor administrative costs, however recent changes to the Countywide Cost Allocation Plan will affect the Department's ability to keep these costs below fifteen percent. These changes are outside the Department's control.
F13
The Grand Jury found the Butte County Board of Supervisors to be surprisingly uninformed, and un-involved in overseeing and monitoring the Department of Behavioral Health 's fiscal affairs, structure of management, and administrative decisions made for the Department. When questioned they were unable to answer most of the Grand Jury's inquiries about the Department. The respondent strongly disagrees with the finding. The Board of Supervisors . is well informed on key issues of the department including fiscal affairs and structure of management. The Board has actively engaged the public and the department by calling for and participating in regular and detaiIed workshops to discuss key issues of the department. Moreover, -the department presents policy issues at regular Board meetings wherein the Board makes informed decisions. Furthermore, a member of the Board of Supervisors sits on the Mental Health Advisory Board, consistently attends meetings, vigorously participates in the discussions, and regularly reports back to the full Board of Supervisors.
Related Recommendations (1)
R13
The Board of Supervisors should become more regularly informed and more involved with thef iscal afairs and administrative structure of BCDBH, The recommendation has been implemented. The Board of Supervisors is well informed on key issues of the department including fiscal affairs and structure of management. The Board has actively engaged the public and the department by calling for and participating in regular and detailed workshops to discuss key issues of the department. Moreover, the department presents policy issues at regular Board meetings wherein the Board makes informed decisions. Furthermore, a member of the Board of Supervisors sits on the Mental Health Advisory Board, consistently attends meetings, vigorously participates in the discussions, and regularly reports back to the full Board of Supervisors. RI4, The Psychiatric Health Facility should retain fir11 coverage stafing in order to continue to operate atfull capacity. The recommendation has been implemented.
F14
The PHF was visited and found to be well staffed extreme& clean, and fill to its sixteen bed capacity. The respondent agrees with the finding. Fl5. The Crisis Stabilization Unit is nowfuly stiifled 24-7 and is in compliance with state mandates as of March 7, 2009. The respondent agrees with the finding. The respondent agrees that the Crisis Stabilization Unit is now fully staffed and operational. However, the department was never out of compliance with State mandates as a result of staffing issues.
Related Recommendations (1)
R14
The Psychiatric Health Facility should retain full coverage staffing in order to continue to operate at full capacity. This recommendation has been implemented.
F15
The Crisis Stabilizati nit is now fully staffed 24-7 and i@ compliance with state mandates as of March 7, The respondent agrees with this finding. 'The Crisis Stabilization Unit is now fully staffed and operational. However, the department was never out of compliance with State mandates as a result of staffing issues.
Related Recommendations (1)
R15
The Crisis Stabilization Unit should retain &I1 coverage stafing in order to continue to operate at&ll capacity. The recommendation has been implemented.
F16
Caseload ratios in the clinics and counseling centers need to be studied and adjusted accordingly. The respondent agrees with the finding. The department will continue to study caseload ratios as programs and staffing change over time.
Related Recommendations (1)
R16
Clinics and counseling center's caseload ratios should be studied and reassessed. The recommendation has been implemented. RI 7. The Representative Payee Program should be contimud in itsf ill capacity and should not be outsourced. The recommendation has been.implemented. RIB. The Board of Supervisors should pursue receipt of the outside audit done in August-September, 2008. The recommendation has not been implemented but will be implemented in the future. It is anticipated that the final report related to the fiscal review of the Department will be completed in December 2009 and presented to the Board sometime thereafter. BUTTE COUNTY JAIL Grand Jury Findings Fl. The west facility received an equipment update to make it a state of the art facility. One oflcer can control digital video recorders, open and close individual doors, and give commands and information to the inmates while they are in their cells. The respondent agrees with the finding.
F17
Representative Payee Program was slated to be discontinued but following protest from medical and clinical staB the program is presently filly maintained Grant monies that supported the program in the past have now been diverted to a homeless program. The Representative Payee Program is currently being supported by realignmentf inds. The respondent disagrees with the finding. As part of the mid-year budget reduction, the department planned on using an alternative payee service model but it proved unsatisfactory. There were some positive adjustments within the Representative Payee Program that promoted self-reliance for the client who wanted to be independent of the County managing their income. Grant h d s continue to partially support this program, with the balance of the funding corning from realignment.
Related Recommendations (1)
R17
The Representative Payee Program should be continued in its full capacity and should not be outsourced. This recommendation has been implemented. The Representative Payee Program will continue to be responsive to individual client needs, goals circumstances and preferences. The clients and clinical staff will continue to work together to evaluate individual client goals/needs and ensure c with increased levels of functioni an graduate from this supportive program as ap Clients will continue to be a o r t e d to pursue their own wellness and recovery goals.
F18
The outside audit report done in August-September, 2008 has not been received to date. The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. The respondent agrees that the outside finance report has not been received. However, the report has not been completed. While a portion of the report has been completed, additional reviews will take place from September through November, which will include the implementation of the new information system. The full report is expected by December 2009. Grand Jury Recommendations
Related Recommendations (1)
R18
The Board of supervisors should pursue receipt of the outside audit done in August- September, 2008. The respondent is unable to comment on this recommendation. The respondent does not have the authority to implement the recommendation. However it is anticipated that the final report related to the fiscal review of the Department will be completed in December 2009. Edward Walker Interim Director Department of Behavioral Health MEMBERS OF THE BOARD 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE BILL CONNELLY OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3380 JANE DOLAN Telephone: (530) 538-763 1 Fax: (530) 538-7120 MAUREEN KIRK STEVE LAMBERT KIM K. YAMAGUCHI Gregory Iturria Interim Chief Administrative Ofticer August 14,2009 Honorable James F. Reilley, Presiding Judge Butte County Superior Court One Court Street Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Chief Administrative Officer's Response to the 2008-2009 Grand Jury Final Report Honorable Judge Reilley, Penal Code Section 933 and 933.05 provides that the governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body. The Board of Supervisors, as the governing body of the County of Butte, will provide its response to the 2008-2009 Grand Jury Report by the statutory deadline. The Grand Jury, though, has asked that all departments mentioned within that report provide a direct response to the Presiding Judge. While all legal requirements for a response to the Grand Jury Report have been met by the County of Butte with the Board of Supervisors response, in the spirit of cooperation, I am providing this direct response to those areas where the Grand Jury sought a response from the Chief Administrative Officer. One of the roles of the Chief Administrative Off~ceris to act as the de facto chief of staff to the Board of Supervisors. In that role, I directed the preparation of the Board of Supervisors' initial response to the Report. It should not be a surprise, therefore, that my response to the Report, as the Interim Chief Administrative Officer, is very similar to the response provided by the Board of Supervisors. I am also responding in my regular role as the Chief Financial Officer. AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S OFFICE Grand Jury Findings Fl. A portion of workload scheduled to be transferredfiom the A-C's Ofice to the CFO's Ofice has not yet occurred The respondent agrees with the fmding. Due to the budget constraints and elimination of finance staff, some duties of the Auditor Controller's Office have not been moved to the CFO's office.
No Responses Found 2
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Butte County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office