Orange County Grand Jury
• 2007-2008
• Agency Response
Response to:
Water Budgets, Not Water Rationing 05/22/08, 110K
Water Budgets, Not Water Rationing*
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
F1
Opportunities for further water conservation exist especially with regard to landscape watering. Response: The City agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Continue to emphasize methods and availability of tools that assist customers in understanding weather-based irrigation practices by: Providing a hotline for assisting the public with landscape irrigation information. Providing a countywide soil texture map on the MWDOC website. Developing an Orange County specific water calculator on the MWDOC website. ء بر Orange County Grand Jury Report: "Water Budgets, Not Water Rationing" dated May 14, 2008 August 18, 2008 The City notes that these recommendations have not yet been Response: implemented by the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC). The City understands that MWDOC has committed to implementation of the Grand Jury's recommendations regarding weather-based irrigation practices by November 20, 2008 on behalf of itself and its retail member agencies in Orange County.
F2
Conservation pricing, or tiered pricing, with a fair and reasonable base allotment, followed by tiers of higher rates, can be an effective tool to motivate further conservation. Response: The City agrees with the finding. Grand Jury Recommendations
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.