San Bernardino County Grand Jury
• 2019-2020
Editorial Committee Kkeantnheetrhi Wn.e M Raayysb, Ochualidr John Bradley
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 17 findings
F1
Page 79
City staff did not inform their superiors or the City Council that changes to the Treasurer's Report, made by the City Treasurer, were removed by staff members before publication.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 79
The removal of the Unfunded Pension Liability comments from the monthly Treasury Report was acknowledged and eventually approved by members of the City of Upland Finance Committee.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 79
The City of Upland did remove the City Treasurer's signature block from the Treasurer's Report after the City Treasurer refused to sign the report without a statement about Unfunded Pension Liabilities being placed on the report.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Page 79
The City of Upland marginalized (limited) the City Treasurer's role in the City's financial oversight because they did not want their citizens to ask questions regarding the City's Unfunded Pension Liabilities.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 79
The City of Upland considers actions of publicly addressing the Unfunded Pension Liability as inviting negative criticisms and questions from the citizens of Upland, and not being part of the solution.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Page 79
The handwritten notation of $112,039,675.00, representing the City of Upland’s Unfunded Pension Liability, on the monthly Treasury report, although not a best practice, is allowable.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Page 79
CA Government Code Title 4, Chapter 3, Section 41006 (Exhibit 1) authorizes the appointment of a Deputy City Treasurer by the City Treasurer.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Page 80
City management personnel are confused about the City Treasurer's voting authority as a member of the Finance Committee. It is not unanimously understood if the City Treasurer has full voting authority on all Committee issues, or is restricted to specific issues.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Page 80
The City’s management personnel were confused about the roles and responsibilities of the elected City Treasurer, and expressed a preference that the City Treasurer be appointed rather than elected.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Page 80
City of Upland Finance Committee members either were misinformed or confused about their roles on the Finance/Investment Committee(s).
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Page 80
Not all City management personnel and City Council Members are familiar with the City of Upland’s Statement of Investment Policy (Exhibit 2).
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Page 80
City of Upland officials, elected and management, do not have a complete understanding of how CA Government Code Title 4, Chapter 3, Sections 41001- 41007 (Exhibit 1) and CA Government Code Title 5, Division 2 53646 (Exhibit 7) apply to the financial reporting and operational processes of the City of Upland.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Page 80
City of Upland management personnel is not aware of a City Treasurer's formal orientation process that defines his duties, responsibilities, authority, and interactions within the City of Upland.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
Page 80
The duties of the elected City Treasurer have been reduced or limited to simply overseeing the investment funds, rather than overseeing all funds received and paid out by the City, as specified by CA Government Code Title 4, Chapter 3, Sections 41001 – 41005 (Exhibit 1) and the City’s Statement of Investment Policy (Exhibit 2), dated June 25, 2018.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
Page 80
The City of Upland does not have a clear understanding of the amount of annual pension cost and seriousness of the Unfunded Pension Liabilities threatening the City of Upland.
No recommendations for this finding
F16
Page 81
Finance Committee meeting minutes and past Investment Report Summaries are not available on the City of Upland’s website for public review.
No recommendations for this finding
F17
Page 81
Management personnel discontinued the operation of the Finance Committee to limit input by the City Treasurer regarding Unfunded Pension Liability because they did not want their citizens asking questions about the Unfunded Pension Liability.
No recommendations for this finding
Conclusions 35
-
CL1 Page 14Recommendation 16-17: Not in compliance with the Recommendation. Specific details concerning Recommendation 16-17 are in the section titled Current Status.
-
CL2 Page 14Recommendation 16-18: Completed as recommended. Specific details concerning
-
CL3 Page 14Recommendation 16-19: Not in compliance with the Recommendation. Specific details concerning Recommendation 16-19 are in the section titled Current Status.
-
CL4 Page 14Recommendation 16-20: Completed as recommended. Specific details concerning
-
CL5 Page 14Recommendation 16-21: Completed as recommended. Specific details concerning
-
CL6 Page 23Recommendation 16-22: Not in compliance with the Recommendation. Specific details concerning Recommendation 16-22 are in the section titled Current Status.
-
CL7 Page 24Recommendation 16-23: Not in compliance with the Recommendation. Specific details concerning Recommendation 16-23 are in the section titled Current Status.
-
CL8 Page 24Recommendation 16-24: Not in compliance with the Recommendation. Specific details concerning Recommendation 16-24 are in the section titled Current Status.
-
CL9 Page 24Recommendations 16-25 and 16-26 were combined in the City of Rialto Code Enforcement’s response to these Recommendations: Not in compliance with the
-
CL10 Page 24Recommendation 16-27: Completed as recommended. Specific details concerning Recommendation 16-27 are in the section titled Current Status.
-
CL11 Page 24Recommendation 16-28: Completed as recommended. Specific details concerning Recommendation 16-28 are in the section titled Current Status. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CODE ENFORCEMENT
-
CL12 Page 30Recommendation 15-11: Not in compliance with the Recommendation. Specific details concerning Recommendation 15-11 are in the section titled Current Status.
-
CL13 Page 31Recommendation 15-12: Not in compliance with the Recommendation. Specific details concerning Recommendation 15-12 are in the section titled Current Status.
-
CL14 Page 31Recommendation 15-13: Not in compliance with the Recommendation. Specific details concerning Recommendation 15-13 are in the section titled Current Status. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
-
CL15 Page 48Recommendation 18 – 4: Completed as recommended
-
CL16 Page 48Recommendation 18 – 5: Not completed as recommended
-
CL17 Page 48Recommendation 18 – 6: Completed as recommended
-
CL18 Page 48Recommendation 18 – 7: Completed as recommended
-
CL19 Page 48Recommendation 18-10: In process with no completion date provided Note that Recommendations 18-8, 18-9 and 18-11 were not included in this Response and Accountability report since Hesperia Unified School District did not agree with the FY2017- 2018 Civil Grand Jury’s recommendation. The specific details concerning the 2019-2020 Civil Grand Jury's analysis of Hesperia Unified School District responses to the Grand Jury's questions are in the section titled Current Status of each recommendation reviewed. * California Penal Code Section 243.4. Refer To: PART 1. OF CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS [25 - 680.4] (Part 1 enacted 1872) TITLE 8. OF CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON [187 - 248] (Title 8 enacted 1872) CHAPTER 9. Assault and Battery [240 - 248] (Chapter 9 enacted 1872) ** California Penal Code 11166. Refer To: PART 4. PREVENTION OF CRIMES AND APPREHENSION OF CRIMINALS [11006 - 14315] (Part 4 added by Stats. 1953, Ch. 1385) TITLE 1. INVESTIGATION AND CONTROL OF CRIMES AND CRIMINALS [11006 - 11482] (Title 1 added by Stats. 1953, Ch. 1385) CHAPTER 2. Control of Crimes and Criminals [11150 - 11199.5] (Chapter 2 added by Stats. 1953, Ch. 70) ARTICLE 2.5. Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act [11164 - 11174.3] (Heading of Article 2.5 amended by Stats. 1987, Ch. 1444, Sec. 1. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FACILITIES, SITE SECURITY AND PUBLIC SAFETY
-
CL20 Page 55Recommendation 17 – 43: Completed as recommended
-
CL21 Page 55Recommendation 17 – 44: Due to Department of Homland Security restrictions the Grand Jury was unable to determine if recommendation was implemented.
-
CL22 Page 55Recommendation 17 – 45: Completed as recommended.
-
CL23 Page 55Recommendation 17 – 46: Completed as recommended The specific details concerning the 2019-2020 San Bernardino County Civil Grand Jury's analysis of San Bernardino County Site Security and Public Safety responses to the Grand Jury's request for additional information are in the section titled Current Status of each
-
CL24 Page 65Recommendation 18-15 was effectively implemented
-
CL25 Page 65Recommendation 18-16 was effectively implemented
-
CL26 Page 65Recommendation 18-17 was effectively implemented
-
CL27 Page 65Recommendation 18-18 was effectively implemented
-
CL28 Page 65Recommendation 18-19: The ORAS system was purchased but not yet installed.
-
CL29 Page 65Recommendation 18-20: No evidence supports that this recommendation was effectively implemented.
-
CL30 Page 65Recommendation 18-21 was effectively implemented The specific details concerning the 2019-2020 San Bernardino County Civil Grand Jury's analysis of San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department Inmate Welfare Fund responses to the Grand Jury's questions are in the section titled, ‘Current Status’ of each recommendation reviewed.
-
CL31 Page 34The 2019-2020 Civil Grand Jury Response and Accountability Committee finds SBMWD appropriately responded and implemented the recommendations of the FY2017-2018 Civil Grand Jury Final Report. No further action is necessary.
-
CL32 Page 35EMERGENCY GROUND AMBULANCE CONTRACT #12-254
-
CL33 Page 37The 2019-20 Civil Grand Jury acknowledges the responses from ICEMA and there has been no progress by ICEMA on the recommendations developed by the FY2017-2018 Civil Grand Jury due to state law provisions prohibiting grandfathering and due to the contractual rights of the ambulance providers to provide services in their respective areas for varying lengths of time. Consequently, there is no RFP process in place. Lastly, on March 19, 2019 the ICEMA Board of
-
CL34 Page 37Directors approved a three year extension for Contract 12-254 (as amended) until March 31, 2022.
-
CL35 Page 39FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 RECONCILIATION REPORT
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Chino
City