⚠️ Aviso de traducción:
Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected:
F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F8
Findings and Recommendations
3 findings
Agree with finding. Response: The only current jail site that is available for expansion is the James A. Musick facility.
Related Recommendations (1)
facilities and begin planning for new jail beds. The recommendation has been implemented Response: *** Grand Jury Report The State of Orange County Jails The OCSD is committed to achieving compliance with State standards for local detention facilities. To address current and projected jail bed needs, the OCSD is continuing to construct new jail facilities at the Theo Lacy facility as well as planning for new construction at the James A. Musick facility. Included in the OCSD budget for FY 2003-04 is funding for a Master Plan for the James A. Musick facility. The OCSD begin an in-depth need assessment immediately.
Agree with finding. Response: The James A. Musick facility is the only jail site with an approved Environmental Impact Report for future expansion. The most recent needs assessment by OCSD was completed in 1998.
No recommendations for this finding
Disagree partially with finding. Response: While the last formal needs assessment was completed in 1998, the OCSD conducts ongoing needs assessment studies. Staffing for the beds at Theo Lacy, scheduled to open in 2005, has not received budget 11. approval. Disagree partially with the finding. Response: The Board of Supervisors approved a three-phase expansion of the Theo Lacy facility. The construction of Building "C" and "A" are complete with approved staffing budgets. The final phase, Building "B", is scheduled to open in September 2004. The staffing budget request for Building "B" will be considered by the Board of Supervisors during the FY 2004-05 budget development process.
No recommendations for this finding
