📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Tulare County Grand Jury • 2009-2010

Who Is Protecting the Children in Tulare County?

3 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 12 findings

F1
A request was made to review random foster care case files, which was denie per Welfare and Institutions Code Sections 827 and 10850. .
F2
A request was made to ride along with CWS Social Worker to observe living conditions and caseworker interaction with foster parents and foster children which was denied per Welfare and Institutions Code Section 827 and
F3
A request was made to attend juvenile court hearings dealing with custody issues, which was denied per Welfare and Institutions Code Section 827 and 10850.
F4
CWS guidelines require monthly visits by caseworkers. This requirement was not met in all cases. Some cases went up to six months or longer without a visit by a Social Worker.
F5
Mental health evaluations are not routinely performed prior to placing a child in a foster care home.
F6
Visits to birth parents are often traumatic to the foster children resulting in disruptive behavior by the children.
F7
There is little or no instruction given to emancipated youth, by Social Workers, on how to access medical services, social security, or monies for education.
F8
On some occasions children are allowed to interview and help select their own foster parents.
F9
CASA provides effective advocacy for foster care children.
F10
Cuts to the State budget have resulted in the Independent Living Program (ILP) being eliminated.
F11
The ILP provided instruction to foster children to prepare them for self- sufficiency. It included instruction in: a. furthering their education, b. daily living skills, c. seeking employment and d. financial literacy (including budgeting and maintaining bank accounts).
F12
The ILP was very beneficial to the success of foster children becoming productive members of society.

Recommendations 6