⚠️ Translation Notice:
This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations
3 findings
Certain witnesses interviewed by the Grand Jury, knowingly, repeatedly and willfully, violated their lawful secrecy admonition. Auditor-Controller's Response: Having no personal information related to this finding, I am unable to agree or disagree with this finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
If you have any additional questions or need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 707-299-1733. Sincerely, Tracy A. Schulze Auditor-Controller Enclosure ____ ۲. Napa County
The conduct of the witnesses in repeatedly violating the Grand Jury's lawful secrecy admonition created an atmosphere of apprehension and intimidation which impeded the proper investigation of the Grand Jury. Auditor-Controller's Response: Having no personal information related to this finding, I am unable to agree or disagree with this finding. However, I agree that if witnesses repeatedly violate the Grand Jury's secrecy admonition, it could create an atmosphere of apprehension and intimidation which would impede the proper investigation of the Grand Jury.
No recommendations for this finding
The conduct of the witnesses who violate the secrecy admonition is punishable as contempt of the Superior Court. Auditor-Controller's Response: I don't have adequate legal background to agree or disagree on this finding. Response to Recommendation:
No recommendations for this finding
No Responses Found
1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
