📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Sacramento County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

Reason for Investigation

Published: June 14, 2019 118 pages Consolidated Report
View PDF View Full Original

Findings and Recommendations 13 findings

F1
There is no formal organizational model being used by the community of organizations that will ensure the most effective use of the critical resources available to be used to address homelessness in Sacramento County.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The leaders and workers in the community of organizations actively working to address the challenges presented by homelessness in Sacramento County have demonstrated an impressive level of both dedication and competence in assisting and supporting the County’s homeless population.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
A County of Sacramento Homeless Plan to secure NPLH funds was recently developed by the County and adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The plan presents a significant initial strategic direction for addressing homelessness in Sacramento County and many of the organizations providing services and programs for the homeless collaborated with the County on the plan’s development and support its direction and implementation.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
CCSD makes a good faith effort to comply with the California Public Records Act.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
CCSD makes a good faith effort to keep adequate and appropriate District records to fulfill legal requirements.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
CCSD’s records retention policy requires its records be safeguarded and adequately protected.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
CTE Programs take an estimated six years to develop and produce the first graduates. This is too long to react to fast-changing demands in the labor market.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Since each school district in the County runs its own programs related to alcohol and other drugs, there is a significant variation in the resources available to students and their families throughout Sacramento County. 72
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
School districts should establish Youth Program Specialists or similar positions to administer programs related to alcohol and drug prevention in the next budget cycle. (F8)
F9
After voting to award health benefits to Board members, no further action was taken, no policies were created, and no health insurance benefits were awarded to Board members. The Board could institute health benefits for themselves with no further public discussion.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The practice of conducting closed sessions after open sessions at the Board meeting may lead to an uninformed public and forestalls knowledge or comments. This practice does not encourage public engagement.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Candidate pools for Board Member seats are so low that elections are sometimes not required. As a consequence, Board members are appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, denying a voice to the public in selection of those who represent them.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
The lack of adequate Board member awareness of regulations, operations, and institutional history can lead to poor decisions on the part of the Board and leads to an over-reliance on the General Manager and staff.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
There is a pronounced lack of public oversight of the FRCD, as shown by poorly attended meetings and few Board candidates.
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 10

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Sacramento City
Sacramento County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office