Score: -3
(0/2/3)
San Diego County Grand Jury
• 2011-2012
Storm Drains in Leucadia
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 3 findings
F01
Further improvements to the Leucadia storm water drainage system are necessary. Fact: Leucadia storm drain design choices are hampered by the 24” diameter size limit imposed on outfall piping to Batiquitos Lagoon due to a California Coastal Commission ruling. Fact: Water flow near the north end outlet over-loads for most storm scenarios. Fact: Micro-tunneling through the Leucadia ocean bluffs for purposes of storm drain installation is acceptable to the California Coastal Commission. Fact: Constructing an overflow drain for Leucadia Roadside Park westward through the bluff at Beacons Beach was an alternative recommended by a major engineering study.
F02
Storm drainage through the Leucadia bluffs at Beacons Beach and possibly at other locations should be considered by the City of Encinitas. Fact: No capital improvements to the Leucadia storm water system are currently funded. Fact: Special Assessment Districts (S.A.D.s) may be established by a governing agency to levy taxes for specific infrastructure improvements, such as storm water drains.
F03
Funding Leucadia storm water drainage work through a Special Assessment District (S.A.D.) is an option for the City of Encinitas. 152
Recommendations 3
-
12-42Page 9Develop an immediate plan of action or Council resolution to
-
12-43Page 9Include storm water flow through the bluff at Leucadia
-
12-44Page 9Explore storm drain, capital improvement tax funding for
Agency Responses 1
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.