City of Petaluma Post Office Box 61*

Published: August 08, 2006 3 pages

View Original PDF

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings and recommendations have not been extracted yet.

The full report content may still be accessible via the PDF link above.

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

City of Petaluma

August 08, 2006 • 3 pages • 5 responses • Score: +3 (+3, 2, 0) View Details ▾

PDF

5 responses to findings and recommendations

officers should verify that health or other lifetime benefit promises are secured properly and in compliance with reserve funding standards. <b>Petaluma's Response:</b> Agree, with explanation. The recommendation will be implemented by December 31, 2006. City Manager's Office 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952

Response: Will Implement

Score: +1

</b> Agree, with explanation. The recommendation will be implemented by December 31, 2006. City Manager's Office 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952 R-2 The grand jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors and/or City Councils enlist actuarial expertise to audit this asset/obligation disclosure. Phone (707) 778-4345 Fax (707) 778-4419 E-Mail Petaluma's Response: Agree, with explanation. [email protected] The recommendation will be implemented by December 31, 2006. Animal Services 840 Hopper Street Ext. Petaluma, CA 94952 R-3 The grand jury recommends that the advice of an exper...

The grand jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors and/or City Councils enlist actuarial expertise to audit this asset/obligation disclosure. Phone (707) 778-4345 Fax (707) 778-4419 E-Mail Petaluma's Response: Agree, with explanation. [email protected] The recommendation will be implemented by December 31, 2006. Animal Services 840 Hopper Street Ext. Petaluma, CA 94952

Response: Will Implement

Score: +1

Agree, with explanation. [email protected] The recommendation will be implemented by December 31, 2006. Animal Services 840 Hopper Street Ext. Petaluma, CA 94952 R-3 The grand jury recommends that the advice of an expert should be solicited Phone (707) 778-4396 Fax (707) 778-4397 to consider the fairest most equitable way to offer health care benefits to public employees. This should be disclosed. Risk Management 11 English Street Petaluma's Response: Agree, with explanation. Petaluma, CA 94952 Phone (707) 778-1118 Fax (707) 778-8213 The recommendation will be implemented by December...

The grand jury recommends that the advice of an expert should be solicited Phone (707) 778-4396 Fax (707) 778-4397 to consider the fairest most equitable way to offer health care benefits to public employees. This should be disclosed. Risk Management 11 English Street Petaluma's Response: Agree, with explanation. Petaluma, CA 94952 Phone (707) 778-1118 Fax (707) 778-8213 The recommendation will be implemented by December 31, 2006. E-Mail [email protected] or [email protected]

Response: Will Implement

Score: +1

Agree, with explanation. Petaluma, CA 94952 Phone (707) 778-1118 Fax (707) 778-8213 The recommendation will be implemented by December 31, 2006. E-Mail [email protected] or [email protected] R-4 The grand jury recommends to build a secure structure for maintenance of employee benefits should not be deferred. Petaluma's Response: This recommendation has been implemented. The City of Petaluma has already implemented the recommendation of tracking retiree benefits through its accounting and financial recordkeeping system. R-5 The grand jury recommends full disclosure of each entities tot...

The grand jury recommends to build a secure structure for maintenance of employee benefits should not be deferred. Petaluma's Response: This recommendation has been implemented. The City of Petaluma has already implemented the recommendation of tracking retiree benefits through its accounting and financial recordkeeping system.

Response: Implemented

Score: 0

This recommendation has been implemented. The City of Petaluma has already implemented the recommendation of tracking retiree benefits through its accounting and financial recordkeeping system. R-5 The grand jury recommends full disclosure of each entities total benefit obligations along with information describing provisions to secure them. We are requesting this information between the end of each entities current fiscal year and December 31, 2006: Number of employees eligible for pension premiums. Number of retired employees receiving pension benefits. Financial obligation. What reserves ...

The grand jury recommends full disclosure of each entities total benefit obligations along with information describing provisions to secure them. We are requesting this information between the end of each entities current fiscal year and December 31, 2006: Number of employees eligible for pension premiums. Number of retired employees receiving pension benefits. Financial obligation. What reserves are in place to insure these pension obligations. Obligation for health care coverage. Reserve amoun...

Response: Implemented

Score: 0

This recommendation has been implemented. The City of Petaluma has already implemented the recommendation. Bulleted information below is information already gathered in City's financial system: 329 employees are eligible for pension premiums. There are 88 employees and 7 council members who receive benefits. Current retired healthcare financial obligation is approximately $69,000 annually. Due to the small annual obligation, the City has chosen to pay this benefit as part of the budget process with no reserve account. Maximum retiree benefit is $100 per month, which requires 20 plus years of e...

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.