San Mateo County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

San Mateo County’s Cottage Industry of Sanitary Districts Issue | Executive Summary | Introduction | Glossary |

Published: June 28, 2016 173 pages Consolidated Report
View Original PDF

Findings 13 findings

F1 Page 46
From 2013-2015, San Mateo County sewer agencies had more than twice as many sanitary sewer overflows as San Jose and three times as many as Central Contra Costa Sanitary District.
F2 Page 46
Independent district websites have gaps in information regarding historical rates, sewer system management plans, and sanitary sewer overflows. Meeting minutes and financial audits are frequently out of date.
F3 Page 46
The use of the annual property tax statement for billing purposes makes the cost of sewer services less visible to residents.
F4 Page 46
Elections for sanitary district board membership are rarely contested, and when they are, voter turnout is low. The average tenure of board members is over 10 years.
F5 Page 46
Five of the six districts receive countywide property taxes, which means that residents’ fees are not paying the full cost of sewer services.
F6 Page 46
Sewer rates from 2010-2011 to 2015-2016 increased faster than the consumer price index. The six districts acknowledged that this trend is likely to continue given the age of pipelines in the County and the cost of maintenance to and replacement of those pipelines.
F7 Page 46
Funds for treatment plants pass from ratepayers through the independent sanitary districts to the treatment plants; the sanitary districts add little value.
F8 Page 46
The total budget for operating the boards of the six districts studied is over $225,000. East Palo Alto’s average annual compensation for directors is $18,000, 66% higher than the 60 San Francisco Water Power Sewer, SSIP Goals & Level of Service. http://sfwater.org/index.aspx?page=668. Ibid. City of San Jose, Sewer System Management Plan, Document No. 1131790, October 2014, p. 8. See Appendix L: References to “Disaster” or “Emergency” in Board Meeting Minutes. next highest (and much larger) district, West Bay. Bayshore and East Palo Alto offer employee-type benefits to directors including dental insurance.
F9 Page 47
The pipelines of the six districts are aging, with almost half having been laid over 50 years ago. These pipes are approaching end of life.
F10 Page 47
There are many wholly or partially redundant activities across the six independent districts, including board costs, financial audits, legal services, and engineering.
F11 Page 47
Most of the independent sanitary districts rely almost entirely on contractors to fulfill their responsibilities.
F12 Page 47
In many cases, district leadership is unfamiliar with the existing and emerging technologies for improving sewer system performance while reducing costs.
F13 Page 47
The proliferation of sanitary districts within San Mateo County makes it challenging to coordinate an emergency response. The districts themselves have not reviewed or discussed emergency/disaster planning within their boards in the past year.

Recommendations 13

No Responses Found 6

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Bayshore Sanitary District (San Mateo) Special District
East Palo Alto Sanitary District (San Mateo) Special District
Granada Community Services District Special District
Montara Sanitary District (San Mateo) Special District
West Bay Sanitary District (San Mateo) Special District
Westborough County Water District Special District