El Dorado County Grand Jury
• 2011-2012
El Dorado County Grand Jury 2011-2012 El Dorado County Contracts Case number Gj-11-013
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
F1
Page 2
Departments within El Dorado County have the ability to approve smaller contracts without a bid process, and do so on a regular basis.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of Supervisors amend the El Dorado County Charter to include ‘services’ under Article 6, Section 601, when purchases are made for the county.
F2
Page 2
Department Heads frequently contract with businesses from outside El Dorado County.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Grand Jury recommends that all county contracts be awarded to vendors within El Dorado County as long as they meet the requirements and unless it is found that that type of business does not exist in the county. Responses Responses to both the findings and recommendations in this report are required by law in accordance with California Penal Code §933 and §933.05. Address responses to: The Honorable Suzanne N. Kingsbury, Presiding Judge of the El Dorado County Superior Court, 1354 Johnson Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. This report has been provided to: El Dorado County Board of Supervisors El Dorado County Chief Administrative Office El Dorado County Department of Transportation 76
No Responses Found 3
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
County of El Dorado
Agency
El Dorado County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office