20 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
LAHSA’s coordination of housing, social and health services for the homeless
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The Commission does nothave sufficient information toagree or disagree withthis finding. Finding 2 - LAHSA'sbudgetIn2024 was $875million, withmore than $300million ofthatcoming fromLA County.
F2
LAHSA’s budget in 2024 was $875 million, with more than $300 million of that
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commissiondoes nothave sufficientinformation to agree or disagree with this finding. Finding Z-LA Countyhas decidedto withdrawIts contributions to LAHSAand redeploythem toprovide homelessservicesdirectly(referredtoherein as the Homeless Funds).
LOS ANGELES COUNTY HOSPITALSAND HEALTHCAREDELIVERYCOMMISSION Page3
F3
LA County has decided to withdraw its contributions to LAHSA and redeploy
Response: Agree
Score: +1
TheCommission agrees thatthe County has decidedto withdrawfundsfrom LAHSA and redeployfundsto provide services directly. Finding 4-LA Countyintends tomerge the CEOHomeless Initiative (CEO-HI) and the DHSHousing forHealth (DHS-HFH), creating a new CountyDepartment focused on the homeless (the Homeless Services Department).
F4
LA County intends to merge the CEO Homeless Initiative (CEO-HI) and the DHS
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission agrees withthis finding. Finding 5 - The currentlyproposedtimeline forthe Homeless ServicesDepartment initiativesis as follows:(1)merging the operation ofCEO-HIandDHS-HFHby April 28, 2025, (2) creating the Homeless ServicesDepartmentas ofJuly1, 2025, (3) Phase Iimplementation wouldthen include the "integration ofthe CEO-HIandDHS- HFH core housing andsupportive services,"(4) Phase IIwould include "integration ofCounty-fundedprogramsandservices administeredbyLAHSA"into the Homeless Services Department, (5) Phase Hi would "include the integration of programs andservicesadministered...
F5
The currently proposed timeline for the Homeless Services Department initiatives
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission does not have sufficient information to agree ordisagree with this finding. Finding 6 - The County'sproposalfor the "full"integration ofCounty services for the homeless into one Homeless Services Departmentwillhave twomajorexceptions that willlikelyundermine the County's comprehensive approach to homelessness, possiblyleadingto the same "siloed,fragmented anddisjointedservices"thatplaguedLAHSA.
F6
The County’s proposal for the “full” integration of County services for the
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commissiondoes not have sufficientinformation to agree ordisagree with finding. Finding 7- Thefirstcategoryoflikelyexceptions to the County's integration ofhomeless services willbe certain specifiedhomelessservicesprovided andretainedby otherCountyDepartments, each of whichwillbe assessed forintegration appropriateness "inpartnership"with the relevantDepartment (with the history ofCounty Departmentsasserting the importance oftheir independence likelybeing a major hindrance inachieving full integration).
F7
The first category of likely exceptions to the County’s integration of homeless
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission does not have sufficientinformation to agree ordisagree with finding.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY HOSPITALS AND HEALTHCAREDELIVERYCOMMISSION Page4 Finding 8- ThesecondcategoryofexceptionsIncludes those sen/Ices that are "highlyclinicalanddeeplyIntegrated with DHS's core healthproviderand managedcare functionsforItsempaneledpopulationandfinancing,"thereby keeping manyofthe County's major Interactions with the homeless population withinDHS.
F8
The second category of exceptions includes those services that are “highly
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission does not have sufficient informationto agree or disagree with finding. Finding 9 - There Is no evidence thatLACountyhas anyplans to use the homeless Funds to expandthe County's CalAIMservices (eitherECM or CommunitySupports), IncludingInconnection withthe CountyHospitals' Interactions withthe homeless, especiallyregarding the significant opportunities forIncreasedECMenrollmentbythe CountyHospitals (although the Countydoes acknowledge the Importance ofCalAIMfunding withrespectto currentDHS-HFHfunctions).
F10
The County Departments of Health Services, Public Health and Mental Health
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission does not have sufficient information to agree or disagree withfinding. Finding 11 - The CountyDepartmentsare Inclinedto coordinate theirroles as ECM providers solelyon a voluntary basis. Includingthe enrollmentofMedl-Cal beneficiaries,assignmentofLead Care Managers andaccessing Community Supports networks.
F11
The County Departments are inclined to coordinate their roles as ECM providers
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission does not have sufficient information to agree or disagree withfinding. Finding 12 - M County Iscreating a Restorative Care Village on the LA General campus, which promises togivepatients, especially the homeless, expanded
LOS ANGELES COUNTY HOSPITALSAND HEALTHCARE DELIVERYCOMMISSION Page5 access to a broadcontinuum ofsocialandhealth services; however, the various providersparticipatingin the Restorative Care Village are notsubjectto any centralizedmanagementorcontrol, andtherefore there is littleifanycoordination, much less integration, ofthe various Restorative Care Villageser...
F12
LA County is creating a Restorative Care Village on the LA General campus,
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission agrees Inpart, that LACounty Is creating a Restorative Care Village on the LAGeneral Campus, but lacks sufficient Information to opine on the restofthe statement. Finding Although there are "Restorative Care Villages"located(orbeingbuilt) on the campusesofeach ofthe CountyHospitals as wellas MLKCommunity Hospital, there appears to be no County-wide strategicplan regarding the potential andpurpose ofthe Restorative Care Villages andlittleifanycommunication among the Restorative Care Villages orthe entitiesassociated with them.
F13
Although there are “Restorative Care Villages” located (or being built) on the
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission agrees Inpartthat Restorative Care Villages are located or are being builton the campuses ofeach ofthe County Hospitals and MLK Community Hospital. The Commission does not have sufficient Informationto agree ordisagree with the rest of the finding. Section ill. Findings Regarding CaiAIM Finding 14- There have been no systematicanalyses ofthe CalAIM program'soverallimpacton reducing homelessness, improving healthcare or reducing costs.
F14
There have been no systematic analyses of the CalAIM program’s overall impact
Response: Agree
Score: +1
To the bestof the Commission's knowledge, we agree that there has been no systematic analysis of CalAIM. Finding 15- There are majorimpediments to ECM and Community Supportsproviderparticipation in CalAIMbasedon associatedcosts, nonstandardization ofcomplianceprocesses, burdensome reporting requirements, andinadequate compensation.
F15
There are major impediments to ECM and Community Supports provider
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission agrees with this finding. Finding 16- The enrollmentofMedi-Calbeneficiariesin ECMhas beenlowerthan anticipatedforECM's targetpopulations
LOS ANGELES COUNTY HOSPITALS AND HEALTHCARE DELIVERY COMMISSION Page6
F16
The enrollment of Medi-Cal beneficiaries in ECM has been lower than anticipated
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission agrees with this finding. Finding 17- The State estimates thatonly30% ofMedi-Calbeneficiaries who are identifiedas eligible for ECM williikeiyenrollin ECM, butno studieshave been conductedto determine whythatpercentage is so low.
F17
The State estimates that only 30% of Medi-Cal beneficiaries who are identified as
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission does not have sufficientinformation to agree or disagree with this finding. Finding 18- DHS, asan ECMprovider, onlyenrolls Medi-Calbeneficiaries in ECM who are empaneled with DHS, a relativelylimitedpopulation comparedwithall ECMeligible beneficiariesin LACounty.
F18
DHS, as an ECM provider, only enrolls Medi-Cal beneficiaries in ECM who are
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission does not have sufficient information to agree ordisagree with this finding. Finding 19- Communication andcoordination between ECMproviders and the CommunitySupportsproviders to whom ECMbeneficiariesare referred couldbeimproved.
F19
Communication and coordination between ECM providers and the Community
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission agrees with this finding. Finding 20- Children's HospitalofLosAngelespatientsinclude a high percentage ofECMeligible Medi-Calbeneficiaries; and, byenrolling as an ECM provider, CHLAprovidesan exemplaryexample ofthe opportunities under CalAIMto supportMedi-Calbenehciaries, especiallyregarding the needs of dischargedpatients.
F20
Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles patients include a high percentage of ECM
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Commission does not have sufficient information to agree or disagree with thisfinding. Finding 21 - ProvidingAccessand Transforming Health (PATH) hasprovidedand continuesto provide substantialfunding forparticipantsin the CalAIMinitiatives, especiallyfor infrastructure andstart-up costs.
F21
Providing Access and Transforming Health (PATH) has provided and
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The Commission agrees in partthat PATH has provided funding to CalAIM participants and does not have sufficient information to agree or disagree with the restof the finding. On behalfof the Hospitals and Health Care Delivery Commission, these responses were vetted and approved during a special meeting held on May 13, 2025.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY HOSPITALSAND HEALTHCARE DELIVERYCOMMISSION Page7 Sincerely, David Marshall, JD, DNP, RN Chair go: Executive Office, Board of Supervisors Department of Health Services
BOARDOF HildaL.Soils HollyJ. Mitchell LindseyP.Horvath JaniceHahn Kathryn Barger SUPERV...