📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Nevada County Grand Jury • 2007-2008

Nevada County Veterans Service Office Reason for Investigation The Nevada County Grand Jury (Jury) received numerous

Published: June 09, 2008 10 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 11 findings

F1
There are two permanent Veterans Service Representatives who handle claims. One of these is the Veterans Service Officer, the other is the Assistant Veterans Service Officer. There is also a permanent, part-time office assistant, who effective in April 2008 works 10hrs./week for the VSO; previous to that, the office assistant was a temporary employee who was utilized approximately 30 hrs./week
F2
Since 2006 the VSO, on occasion has given incorrect and misleading information to veterans and their families, and has not always been timely in the handling of claims.
F3
Van service, originally established by a previous Veterans Service Officer has been reduced from three to two times per week, between the Auburn Medical Clinic and the Reno Veterans Administration Hospital.
F4
Placing the VSO under the Social Services Department was intended to enhance intra- county agency co-ordination of services for veterans and their family members.
F5
Since 2006 disharmony among the VSO employees has had a marked effect on the ability of the office to provide services to Nevada County veterans.
F6
Only a small percentage of the 12,000 veterans living in Nevada County seek assistance through the VSO. There are pockets of under-served and housebound veterans living in Nevada County who are currently not being adequately served by the VSO.
F7
The anticipated return of veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan and expanded outreach services will exceed the current capacity of the VSO.
F8
In 2007, because of disharmony in the VSO, the Social Services Director engaged a Veterans Affairs Consultant to analyze the operations and staffing of the office. Nevada County Veterans Service Office P ag e 2
F9
The Social Services Director is addressing the issues identified in the Consultant’s report and is implementing a number of the recommendations including those relating to staffing, training, and co-ordination of services.
F10
The Nevada County veteran’s community is unaware of the VSO’s organizational structure, and in particular, the roles played by the Social Services Department and its Director in the support and oversight of the VSO mission. Conclusions
F11
The BOS treatment of the Fire Plan on April 8, 2008 significantly reduced the importance of the Fire Plan, shifting its focus from mandates and requirements to persuasion and cooperation. Conclusions

Recommendations 11

Conclusions 8

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Nevada County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office