⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
The Grand Jury finds that:
Current decentralized approach of parking management is cumbersome and inefficient.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The City Council Appoint a Parking Service Manager to manage the parking system and its’ funding
F2
The Grand Jury finds that:
Adequate parking exists in the Downtown Area; existing parking garages are under- utilized.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The City Manager increase parking enforcement staff and replace obsolete equipment
F3
The Grand Jury finds that:
Parking enforcement is hampered by outdated equipment and lack of personnel.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The City Council amend the Municipal Code to make “re-parking” (block-face ordinance) in short-term spaces illegal by June 30, 2018. City of Napa, “Downtown Parking Management Plan,” 2015, 3 Yune, Howard, “Vacant Napa lot marked for future parking near downtown,” The Napa Valley Register, December 20, 2016 7
F4
The Grand Jury finds that:
Short-term parking rules are ignored by many merchants and their employees.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The City Manager update the parking plan annually to reflect new developments in the Downtown and Oxbow Districts
F5
The Grand Jury finds that:
Parking is a problem in the Oxbow Area.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The Grand Jury finds that:
The City has not identified funding for replacement of existing garages.
No recommendations for this finding
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Napa
City