Stanislaus County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
Turlock City Council Member Civil Grand Jury Case #09-16-c
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F1
Financial Law Conflict of Interest is easy to understand; however, this was never an issue. The Common Law Conflict of Interest doctrine is somewhat broader in scope and subject to varied interpretations.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
No evidence exists to support the Common Law Conflict of Interest complaint regarding the actions concerning the Turlock Council Member.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The decision to recuse one's self is of great importance to every elected or appointed official. An elected office holder must act with unquestioned integrity at all times, ensuring the public trust. The Council Member actions at no time compromised the good standing of the
No recommendations for this finding
F4
The Turlock City Council Member should have recused herself to avoid any perception of wrongdoing.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
revisions and updates of material addressing Common Law and Financial Conflict of Interest doctrines. The Turlock City Attorney should be responsible for distributing this information to all elected and appointed officials bi-annually. The Turlock City Attorney should create and maintain a log which verifies that all
No recommendations for this finding
Agency Responses 2
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.