📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 27 findings
F1
The California Planning and Zoning Law (Government Code §65300 et seq.) requires adoption of a comprehensive long-term General Plan that determines the development of the county.
F2
The Board of Supervisors determines the annual allocation of the maximum number of building permits to be issued in accordance with Measure J’s growth management program. The 2001 building permits allocations are set at 0.5% over the number of housing units on December 31, 2000.
F3
Land use codes and ordinances are broadly constructed and, therefore, susceptible to multiple interpretations. Review of the Santa Cruz County Planning Department 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report Personnel Findings
F4
The planning staff ’s responsibility is to explain to applicants the limitations imposed on the applicant’s use of their own property by (1) state laws, (2) county codes and (3) county ordinances. Often these rules conflict with the property owner’s desires.
F5
Political influence by the Board of Supervisors places added pressure on the planning staff. Supervisors act for the best interest of their constituency. When membership on the board changes, direction from the supervisors changes.
F6
City governments in the county and many neighboring counties pay higher salaries than Santa Cruz County does. Salaries in Santa Cruz County government are based on a nine- county comparison using Contra Costa, Fresno, Marin, Monterey, Napa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma.
F7
Employee morale is low and turnover is at an unprecedented high. This resulted from failure in negotiations to successively challenge the nine-county comparison. At the peak, there were 24 vacancies in the department. This necessitated taking staff from the advanced planning section to cover shortfalls in other sections.
F8
The personnel department has been unable to attract the necessary people with requisite qualifications to fill vacancies in the Planning Department staff. Some vacant positions are difficult to fill because they are classified as temporary positions. The Planning Department requested hiring an outside consultant to assume the recruitment effort.
F9
According to interviews with employees, workloads continue to be excessive. Also, employee performance evaluations have not been conducted on a consistent basis.
F10
The department has budgeted 125 computer classes, approximately one day’s training for each employee of the Planning Department. The managers of each section are responsible for budgeting additional training courses for staff as needed to enhance their skills.
F11
The Planning Director has implemented a program to acquaint new hires with the operations of the department as well as familiarize current employees with functions of other areas within the department. Additional training for new hires is left to other employees in the area where the person works. The responsibility for ensuring that employees obtain continuing or additional training lies with each manager.
F12
In the fall of 2000, the Planning Director has obtained approval from the Board of Supervisors for a new staff position devoted to training. This staff position will evaluate the training needs of the department and devise strategies and methods to satisfy those needs. Review of the Santa Cruz County Planning Department 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
F13
The Planning Director proposed that employees be assigned to planning teams to be responsible for virtually all the development activity in a particular geographical area. Each team leader will be responsible for acquiring a thorough understanding of the assigned geographic location. Development Review Section Findings
F14
On January 11, 2001, the City of Capitola and its finance director negotiated the Amended Supplemental Employment Agreement. This amendment superceded the March 23, 2000 amendment in its entirety. This action reinstated the direct supervisory relationship between the city manager and finance director. Item 2 states the current finance director will retire June 30, 2001. Item 6 states: “…The parties expect that the directive of the City Manager will be consistent with the position’s ‘Essential Duties and Responsibilities.’ If the Finance Director believes that a directive of the City Manager cannot be reconciled with the above-quoted duty, he may pursue that as a grievance under the grievance procedures in the Management Employees Compensation Plan.” Investigation of the Reporting Structure between the Capitol City Council and City Manager 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report • Included as an exhibit to the January 11, 2000 agreement, the City of Capitola and the current finance director entered into a Contract for Professional Services commencing September 1, 2001 terminating on June 30, 2003. In this contract, the contractor would give advice, recommendations and drafts on several policies and procedures and perform other non-routine tasks. Under the agreement, the contractor is expressly prohibited from performing day-to-day routine tasks. Item 3, under the Duties heading states: “Contractor shall not be requested to, nor shall Contractor, perform any day-to-day, ongoing, routine accounting or fiscal duties, and Contractor shall not supervise, or be supervised by, any official, employee, or agent of the City.” • In response to a question, the finance director stated in the interview the list of contemplated projects attached to the Contract for Professional Services included some tasks that he characterized as ordinarily the responsibility of a finance director.
F15
Despite the impending retirement of the finance director, at the close of fieldwork the City of Capitola had not begun its search for a new finance director. Under the Professional Services Agreement signed by the current finance director, the contractor is prohibited from assisting the city in its day-to-day operations after his retirement. This raises the question: Who will act as finance director after June 30, 2001? The Grand Jury was unable to determine the plans of the city regarding this matter.
F16
In preparing this report, the Grand Jury found it necessary to interview the finance director alone. For six weeks, the Grand Jury attempted to arrange for such a routine interview. This was refused and he was therefore subpoenaed to appear before the Grand Jury. In preparing this report, the Grand Jury found it necessary to conduct a private interview with the finance director. For six weeks, the Grand Jury attempted to arrange for an interview, however, the finance director refused to appear alone. Based on review of the correspondence received from the City of Capitola on this matter, the finance director’s refusal to voluntarily cooperate was supported by the city attorney, mayor and new city manager. A subpoena was subsequently issued and the finance director did appear alone. Penal Code §939 has been interpreted by the courts as operating to prohibit the presence of anyone at a grand jury session other than grand jurors and witnesses actually under examination. The only exceptions are a bailiff, court reporter, or interpreter. Conclusions The city council spent an inordinate amount of time in 2000 discussing and restructuring the reporting relationship of the city manager and finance director that was ultimately returned to its previous state in conformity with Municipal Code. The city council allowed itself to be diverted from crucial city business by the antagonism between these two important city officials, which, in part, led to the resignation of a council member. Instead of using standard government practices to resolve a formal personnel grievance, the city council entered into a contract with one of the parties that contravened its own Municipal Code. A change in the reporting relationship between the city manager and finance director as a quid pro quo agreement for the withdrawal of the grievances presents serious public policy questions. Investigation of the Reporting Structure between the Capitol City Council and City Manager 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
F17
Members of the 2000-01Grand Jury attended board meetings where derogatory remarks were made by one director regarding the general manager’s job performance.
F18
The BCR&PD operated at a loss for fiscal year 2000-01. This shortfall was covered by district reserves.
F19
Of 6,136 voters registered within Boulder Creek Recreation and Park District, 4,633 voted on November 7, 2000 in the BCR&PD board of director’s election. This represents greater than 75% voter turnout. Review of Boulder Creek Recreation and Park District 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report Conclusions Some incumbent directors demonstrate ill will towards each other that impedes their ability to cooperate. This has had a negative impact on the ability of the district to move ahead with a number of proposed projects, including such simple projects as painting a four square court or hopscotch on asphalt. The lack of a current, comprehensive Policies and Procedures Manual, to which the directors and the general manager adhere, has fostered an atmosphere of extreme animosity at the board meetings. This contributes to endless discussions at board meetings. Updating and editing policies and procedures at meetings of the board of directors is poor utilization of meeting time and is an impediment to handling the business of the district. This approach to updating the policies and procedures has created agendas with an unwieldy amount of unfinished business, most of which is related to changes in policies or procedures. Compilation of updated policies and procedures has been haphazard and there is no way to know what changes have been made. The general manager’s ability to perform is impeded by the lack of an approved job description and the absence of annual performance evaluations. This has intensified the ill will between directors who feel the job is being performed adequately and those who feel it is not. The letter of intent to resign by an incumbent director was made public immediately after election results were posted in November 2000. The Grand Jury questions the timing of this action. This letter states that the general manager withheld knowledge of the incumbent’s intent to resign from the other directors. When this letter was made public, the fact that the general manager had known of the intent to resign was revealed, which gave the appearance of impropriety on the part of both the incumbent director and the general manager. This further undermined the relationship between the general manager and the other directors. Limitation of the public at the podium on any one agenda item has improved the ability of the board to move ahead in meetings.
F20
After the formation of the SSC, the chairperson’s communications with parents showed a wider variety of communication techniques. Communication Method Frequency School Newsletter 16 Meetings 4 School Bulletin 6
F21
According to the School Site Council Handbook, “After the SSC is first formed or new members are selected to ongoing councils, the school/district should provide training and ongoing in-service to the members to assist them in carrying out their responsibilities. The training provided to the SSC should be on a regular basis, and the training should be appropriate to the tasks at hand.” Training is not being provided to all site councils in Santa Cruz County.
F22
In the committee’s interview with the County Superintendent of Schools, it was stated “We are now looking at doing training for participants.” Review of the Organization and Structure of Site Councils in Santa Cruz County Public Schools 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
F23
Upon request, training support is available through the County Office of Education.
F24
Survey responses revealed that in many cases parity between school personnel and parent/student representatives was not achieved. Parity was reported by18 of 31 principals and 5 of 16 chairpersons.
F25
Respondents stated that Hispanics and other minorities in many communities are under represented on school site councils.
F26
Some of the methods used to count votes have the appearance of impropriety. While appearance does not constitute wrongdoing, it can still undermine the integrity of the voting process. Conclusions Communication to parents and the local community regarding the school site council, and nominations in particular, needs to be improved. Even though it is not required by education code, nominations to fill seats on site councils should be conducted in accordance with democratic principles. Security of the voting process is non-existent in some schools. • A secured ballot box is not utilized at each school. • Some parents are eliminated from the voting process by missing an election meeting. • Votes returned by students may get lost in transit or misplaced. • Voting process should be established in accordance with democratic procedures. Training should be provided annually to the school site councils. School site councils are not adequately publicized. Too much dependence is placed on the school newsletter for communication. Most schools indicated that they had difficulty obtaining new SSC members. Participation greatly contributes to the success of a school site council; therefore, in order to stimulate interest, more creative efforts should be used. While the Education Code provides for specific oversight of school plans, it is ambiguous regarding the structure and organization of school site councils.
F27
Since the establishment of the CPRB, the Internal Affairs investigation reports have increased from a typical 5-page report to a possible 25-page report. These reports must now be written in laymen’s terms for the CPRB members, rather than police terminology. Conclusions The number of complaints made to the Santa Cruz City Police Department is extremely low. The existing training provided to CPRB members does not involve adequate training in the Police Department’s practices and procedures. An established procedure is in place at the Santa Cruz Police Department to investigate citizen complaints and an additional level of review increases the complaint resolution time. The chief of police is not bound by the recommendations of the CPRB but agrees with their findings in most cases. A review board has the potential to provide a new perspective and serve as a checks and balances on the police department’s complaint review process. Page84 Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
Recommendations 17
-
R1The Planning Department should accept credit cards.
-
R2The Planning Department should immediately resolve all complaints classified as a threat to public health and safety.
-
R3may also apply to local policies and practices followed by Santa Cruz LAFCO. As noted in our response to the findings, we believe that complex public issues deserve a thorough public debate. At this time we are not scheduling any tasks to streamline the local process. If the Grand Jury has any specific suggestions, we would be happy to discuss the feasibility and advisability of streamlining the local process. Again, the Grand Jury is to be commended for its detailed review of how the annexation process was conducted for the Manabe-Burgstrom annexation. Responses to the 1999-2000 Grand Jury Final Report 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report Criminal Justice Committee Reports Blain Street Women’s Facility -
-
R4Physical files should include copies of the recorded code violations (Red Tags) and be consistent with the status shown on the computer screen.
-
R5The Planning Department should utilize the existing ALUS code compliance system for tracking the status of code priority classifications until a future system is operational.
-
R6The Planning Department should complete the status of the outside agency’s review in the computer system.
-
R7The Planning Department should develop a system to cross-reference the multiple physical files that exist for a single development permit application.
-
R8The Auditor-Controller’s Office should implement an internal audit system on Planning Department files.
-
R9The Board of Supervisors should update the 1994 General Plan as soon as is feasible. Review of the Santa Cruz County Planning Department 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
R10The Board of Supervisors should conduct a formal study to determine the relationship of current salaries to employee retention.
-
R11The Board of Supervisors should consider changing the entities in the nine-county comparison used in salary surveys to include the four cities in the county.
-
R12Immediate priority must be given to training Planning Department personnel.
-
R13Planning Department managers should conduct employee reviews consistent with the stated personnel policy of the department.
-
R14The Planning Department should establish the Aptos/Watsonville Satellite Permit Center.
-
R15The Felton Satellite Permit Center should be available five days a week.
-
R16The General Plan and the code compliance complaint status should be available the internet.
-
R17The following should be added to the web site: • Development approval process • Description of the project • Cross reference to a related building permit • Building permit process • The alpha digit at the end of the permit number is confusing and should not be part of the record number • If a permit has been issued, the status on the web page should not show “READY TO ISSUE” • Withdrawn permits should be shown on the web page • Complete projects should show the date of completion on the web page • Cross reference the building permit to any related development approval
Conclusions 49
-
CL1Political pressures from Board of Supervisors
-
CL2Stressful situations for employees who have to tell people what they cannot do with their property Each part of this cycle interacts with another and produces an unstable workforce and a dysfunctional department. Santa Cruz County employee salaries are low relative to housing costs and living expenses in the county. A major contributor to this problem is the nine-county average that is used to determine Santa Cruz County employee salaries. Using the salaries of comparable staff positions in the four cities in the county would be more relevant than counties like Fresno, Napa, Solano or Sonoma. A weighted-average is a better method for calculating benchmark salaries than a simple average. The Planning Department has little control over salaries. Therefore, the problems that plague the Planning Department in regards to employees will continue indefinitely despite their good effort to retain and hire enough new people. Silicon Valley has become a major source of income for a number of Santa Cruz County residents. This has its good and bad points. Since a Silicon Valley employee earns substantially more than a Santa Cruz County employee, Silicon Valley income-earners have driven up the cost of housing in the county. The present salaries of new county employees make it difficult to find affordable housing. This negatively affects recruitment. Review of the Santa Cruz County Planning Department Page 11 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report Training programs for employees are critical to the building of their work skills. The high vacancy rate, which has prevailed within the department, has contributed heavily to the lack of essential training. Political pressure is a way of life for any county’s planning department. Training personnel to deal with this inevitable reality will have the effect of lowering stress and improving morale. The Grand Jury commends the dedicated and loyal Planning Department employees who have persevered during these difficult times. Special thanks go to the employees who cooperated with this review. Development Review Section Conclusions The files selected were completed in a timely manner. They contained sufficient information to understand the decisions that were made in each case. Any deficiencies are not of major significance and can be readily resolved. Building Permit Section Conclusions The files selected were completed in a timely manner. They contained sufficient information to understand the decisions that were made in each case. Any deficiencies are not of major significance and can be readily resolved. Code Compliance Section Conclusions Code A complaints (highest priority involving immediate threat to public health and safety) were not given the high priority indicated by the department’s own policies. One year after the complaint filing date 60% were still unresolved. The failure to promptly resolve serious code violations (Code A) creates circumstances of undue risk of serious injury or death. Code compliance files that are incomplete result in inefficiency. Proper use of the current ALUS code compliance system will accomplish the goal of screening out the old files with a few minor changes. This result can be attained by
-
CL3Adding a new status type
-
CL4Considering the new status type the same as a closed complaint
-
CL5Removing the closed files from all computer reports that show active complaints
-
CL6Keeping the history in the computer
-
CL7Changing all old complaints without health or safety problems to the new status type Relying on a new code compliance computer system as an excuse for not reducing the number of code compliance complaints is unacceptable. Code A-C verses 1-5 should not be an excuse for inaction. Although the department has defined its problems and designed initiatives to help correct the code compliance issues, the department is unable to get beyond the planning stage and implement the policies. Page 12 Review of the Santa Cruz County Planning Department 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report It would be very beneficial to have the code compliance status on the internet for the following reasons:
-
CL8The department would receive fewer calls and visits, which will increase efficiency
-
CL9The department would have a greater incentive to reduce outstanding code compliance complaints Systems and Policies Conclusions Inability to accept credit cards is a disservice to the public. This simple reform would do much to improve public relations and reduce the frustration of the employees. The cost savings of personnel time and the convenience to the citizens would justify the cost. Since almost anyone can enter information into the computer, there is a potential for personal gain, collusion or errors. The department or the Auditor-Controller’s Office should consider installing an internal audit system, randomly picking both closed and open files to review. The web sites for both the development approval process and the building permit process are an excellent source of information to the public. Obtaining a new computerized planning system, currently used by other planning departments in the state, has the potential to reduce personnel costs. Further benefits include:
-
CL10Easy and flexible report writing module
-
CL11Easy way to update internet screens using the data stored in the system
-
CL12Consecutive numbering of the code compliance complaints in order of receipt
-
CL13Prevent a file from advancing to the next stage without completion of previous steps
-
CL14A secured ballot box is not utilized at each school.
-
CL15Some parents are eliminated from the voting process by missing an election meeting.
-
CL16Votes returned by students may get lost in transit or misplaced.
-
CL17Voting process should be established in accordance with democratic procedures. Training should be provided annually to the school site councils. School site councils are not adequately publicized. Too much dependence is placed on the school newsletter for communication. Most schools indicated that they had difficulty obtaining new SSC members. Participation greatly contributes to the success of a school site council; therefore, in order to stimulate interest, more creative efforts should be used. While the Education Code provides for specific oversight of school plans, it is ambiguous regarding the structure and organization of school site councils.
-
CL18Regulations attached to each categorical program are unreasonably confining. They create fragmentation of services that contradict accepted principles in the organization of effective medical practice. This fragmentation creates arbitrary hurdles for a family’s ability to follow treatment regimens and undermines continuity of care for all members of a family.
-
CL19Eligibility requirements and processes for tax-supported health programs are confusing and complex. For providers, compliance diverts scarce resources from direct service. For beneficiaries, the complexity of enrollment is a major disincentive to seeking assistance.
-
CL20The Grand Jury commends the accomplishments of the Central Coast Alliance for Health and its principles of practice for improved administration of Medi-Cal and Healthy Families Programs. Some of their successes are highlighted below: • Alliance membership in the Coalition for Health Care Outreach has contributed to the ongoing, community-wide effort to enroll those who are eligible for Medi-Cal and the Healthy Families Program. This strategy of decentralized outreach is especially important to the Spanish-speaking community whose families are not always aware of their eligibility for Medi-Cal or the Healthy Families Program. • Intensive and continuing efforts by community organizations to enroll eligible families in state and federally assisted health care programs channel scarce county funds into the medical care of those unable to qualify. Review of Health Care Services for Low-Income Families in Santa Cruz County Page 73 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report • The local administration of Medi-Cal and the Healthy Families Programs has proven to be more efficient than state administration. For example, total program costs are lower, a higher quality of care has been achieved and services are more accessible and convenient for beneficiaries. • Member’s access to primary health care and on-going health supervision has significantly reduced the cost of medical care. Primary care physicians and on-going health supervision have successfully managed referrals for specialty care and reduced the use of emergency services and admissions to local hospitals. • Administrative costs are kept within reason and dollars devoted to medical care are maximized. Access to a single family physician who is able to assure continuity of care reduces program costs. • Proactive measures in health education and organized prevention contribute to the maintenance of good health. • Recent State surveys indicate high rates of enrollee satisfaction with plan physicians and medical services. Because Medi-Cal enrollees may serve on the MMCC, they advocate policies that are advantageous to the members they represent.
-
CL21Tax-subsidized health insurance limited to poor children without coverage for parents is contrary to the effectiveness of providing primary and preventive care to the entire family.
-
CL22Low reimbursement rates to local hospitals for care to indigent patients tests the ability of hospital administrators to sustain these critical services.
-
CL23The Coalition for Health Care Outreach has become indispensable to the delivery of health services to low-income families and single adults. Its record has demonstrated the essential value of private and public collaboration in a joint effort to improve the health status of people who are vulnerable.
-
CL24There is a pressing need for primary mental health and dental services at county and community clinics and in the county operated prepaid plans. Credentialed mental health professionals can effectively manage common behavioral problems under the guidance of a psychiatrist. Group therapy can be employed to expand access to mental health care. The use of these strategies may eventually improve access to care in the entire community and contribute to an expansion of the pool of mental health professionals available to low- income families.
-
CL25The Health Services Agency is the logical entity to close critical gaps in the local community health care system.
-
CL26To be effective, the complex network of services to low-income persons requires a high level of mutual trust and cooperation between HSA, private providers and collaborating agencies. The Grand Jury commends the efforts of the HSA.
-
CL27The successful recruitment and retention of credentialed health professionals into county service is seriously impaired by the rising costs of housing, goods and services in Santa Cruz County. Page 74 Review of Health Care Services for Low-Income Families in Santa Cruz County 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL28The Medical Information Management System (MIMS), being developed by the County Health Services Agency, is essential to the improvement of its management of health care programs and the refinement of comprehensive health planning and evaluation.
-
CL29The style, reputation and effectiveness of Salud Para La Gente Clinic demonstrates that open access to primary and preventive health services can be both cost effective and compassionate. The Grand Jury commends Salud Para La Gente Clinic for the manner in which they find and enroll eligible families.
-
CL30With his experience in public health dentistry, the Dientes Community Dental Clinic director could be a valuable resource to the County in planning and implementing a full service dental program for Medi-Cal eligible individuals.
-
CL31The ingenuity and commitment of public health nurses in both case finding and referral and their refusal to be intimidated by the rigidity of the rules and regulations attached to categorical health programs are commended by the Grand Jury.
-
CL32Segregation of hospital care for the poor does not exist in Santa Cruz County due to the accommodation of county patients at community hospitals. All participating parties can take credit for this accomplishment which is recognized by this Grand Jury.
-
CL33The growing population of uninsured families in South County is having a major impact on the ability of health care providers to continue to offer high quality health care service.
-
CL34The volunteers for their dedication and time spent on behalf of their communities. Without the volunteers, these centers could not function successfully.
-
CL35The Sheriff’s Service Centers Deputies and volunteers for providing community outreach and proactive crime reduction at the neighborhood level.
-
CL36The Sheriff’s Service Centers Deputies for their efforts in reducing drug and alcohol abuse in teens through the above mentioned programs.
-
CL37Deputy Amy Christey and the Freedom Service Center for establishing the non-profit organization SAL.
-
CL38The city council spent an inordinate amount of time in 2000 discussing and restructuring the reporting relationship of the city manager and finance director that was ultimately returned to its previous state in conformity with Municipal Code. The city council allowed itself to be diverted from crucial city business by the antagonism between these two important city officials, which, in part, led to the resignation of a council member. Instead of using standard government practices to resolve a formal personnel grievance, the city council entered into a contract with one of the parties that contravened its own Municipal Code. A change in the reporting relationship between the city manager and finance director as a quid pro quo agreement for the withdrawal of the grievances presents serious public policy questions. Page 18 Investigation of the Reporting Structure between the Capitol City Council and City Manager 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL39Failure to apply customary purchasing procedures to consultants, professionals, services and supplies, creates a lack of adequate safeguards to prevent mismanagement of funds. When hiring consultants, the board did not request proposals because of their belief that they had to accept the lowest bid received. When there are no written contracts, board member review of all detailed bills is crucial. Over the years, the board has relegated many of their responsibilities to consultants, which results in relinquishing board duties to nonelected persons. The Grand Jury questions the amount of money expended on consultants’ fees for routine administrative and managerial tasks which could have been performed by employees, such as the chief, assistant chief, battalion chiefs, or administrative assistants. Some board members were reluctant to consider knowledge of the Brown Act as their responsibility. Based on letters and the facts available, the Grand Jury concluded tape recordings made by a recording secretary for the board, a district employee seated at the board’s table, was a public document and should have been made available to the public. Lack of by-laws or other documented procedures for the governing board has fostered a dependency on opinions rather than established policy. Investigation of Complaint Concerning the Board of Directors of Central Fire Protection District Page 25 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL40The budgets in some fire protection districts are too small to provide for a paid firefighter staff. Without volunteer firefighters in these areas, there would be inadequate fire protection. Volunteer firefighters as well as paid firefighters should be acknowledged for their valuable service to the community. To comply with the new law requirements of “two-in, two-out” in fighting structure fires, firefighters must wait until additional firefighters arrive at the scene before entering a structure. This increases the possibility of losing a structure or human life if a person is unable to make their presence known to the firefighters.
-
CL41Some incumbent directors demonstrate ill will towards each other that impedes their ability to cooperate. This has had a negative impact on the ability of the district to move ahead with a number of proposed projects, including such simple projects as painting a four square court or hopscotch on asphalt. The lack of a current, comprehensive Policies and Procedures Manual, to which the directors and the general manager adhere, has fostered an atmosphere of extreme animosity at the board meetings. This contributes to endless discussions at board meetings. Updating and editing policies and procedures at meetings of the board of directors is poor utilization of meeting time and is an impediment to handling the business of the district. This approach to updating the policies and procedures has created agendas with an unwieldy amount of unfinished business, most of which is related to changes in policies or procedures. Compilation of updated policies and procedures has been haphazard and there is no way to know what changes have been made. The general manager’s ability to perform is impeded by the lack of an approved job description and the absence of annual performance evaluations. This has intensified the ill will between directors who feel the job is being performed adequately and those who feel it is not. The letter of intent to resign by an incumbent director was made public immediately after election results were posted in November 2000. The Grand Jury questions the timing of this action. This letter states that the general manager withheld knowledge of the incumbent’s intent to resign from the other directors. When this letter was made public, the fact that the general manager had known of the intent to resign was revealed, which gave the appearance of impropriety on the part of both the incumbent director and the general manager. This further undermined the relationship between the general manager and the other directors. Limitation of the public at the podium on any one agenda item has improved the ability of the board to move ahead in meetings.
-
CL42The Santa Cruz County Office of Education has demonstrated leadership for developing a model Homeless K-12 Education Program in California. They have done an outstanding job of assisting homeless children in Santa Cruz County. The Grand Jury applauds Jo Anne Allen for her work in developing this model program. After 12 years in the program, Ms. Allen has become the leading authority and local and national spokesperson on educating homeless children. Her enthusiasm, knowledge, and leadership have played a paramount role in the success of this program. Community agencies helping homeless families in Santa Cruz County deserve credit for their financial and human services support for the County Office of Education and homeless children these last 12 years.
-
CL43The number of complaints made to the Santa Cruz City Police Department is extremely low. The existing training provided to CPRB members does not involve adequate training in the Police Department’s practices and procedures. An established procedure is in place at the Santa Cruz Police Department to investigate citizen complaints and an additional level of review increases the complaint resolution time. The chief of police is not bound by the recommendations of the CPRB but agrees with their findings in most cases. A review board has the potential to provide a new perspective and serve as a checks and balances on the police department’s complaint review process. Page84 Review of the Citizens’ Police Review Board of the City of Santa Cruz 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL44Residents of California benefit from the firefighting work of the Ben Lomond Conservation Camp and the Grand Jury recognizes the value of their hard work. Wards are given a great opportunity to change and improve their lives through the educational and vocational classes offered at the facility.
-
CL45We commend the staff on the number of classes and activities available to the inmates. However, these activities are optional and are, therefore, dependent on the motivation of each inmate.
-
CL46The staff deserves credit for their beneficial influence on the lives of youth through education, discipline, and friendship in an environment free of gang pressures. With the assurance of three meals a day and the opportunities provided by the Juvenile Hall Facility, these young people are given a chance to change and improve their lives.
-
CL47Much needed structural and security improvements have been initiated with grant funds. Since women at the facility are a growing population, a plan needs to be developed and implemented to curb overcrowding. The turnover rate of detention officers needs to be reduced. Kitchen space and storage are inadequate based on the number of meals prepared daily. Review of the Main Jail Page 97 2000-01 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report
-
CL48The Grand Jury commends the staff for the extensive vocational and educational programs offered to inmates. The work crews of the minimum-security facility are to be applauded for their efforts that enhance and contribute to the maintenance of county landfills, recreational parks and local beaches. The number of inmates who completed their GED while at the facility is impressive.
-
CL49The financial compliance, including the work of their independent Certified Public Accountant, was clear, complete and well presented. Because the members of the Grand Jury change every year, there is no continuity of membership on the county’s audit committee nor a guarantee that a qualified juror is available to sit. If the two grand jurors are removed from the committee, the board of supervisors should consider appointing members of the community that can participate with more continuity.
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Santa Cruz County
County