Orange County Grand Jury • 2003-2004 • Agency Response
Response to: Identity Theft 04/19/04, 94K

City of Fountain Valley*

Published: June 15, 2004 7 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 3 findings

F3 Page 1
"The Orange County District Attorney, the Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department and the city police departments in Orange County take steps to form and actively participate in a County-wide Regional Identity Theft Task Force comprised of representatives of each of these agencies. The Task Force should seek the cooperation and participation of the United States Postal Inspector, the United States Secret Service, the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service and the United States Federal Trade Commission." RESPONSE The Fountain Valley Police Department has a Detective assigned to work identity-theft-related crimes reported within our jurisdiction. Once a determination has been made that a crime has been committed, resources from local, State and the Federal Government (including the United States Postal Inspector, Secret Service, Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Federal Trade Commission) are already available to provide local assistance or assume jurisdiction for the investigation. The forming of a task force would not benefit our Department, as sufficient resources and cooperation currently exist between law enforcement agencies informally. Our Detective attends monthly meetings with the Orange County Fraud and Credit Card Investigators Association, the Southern California Fraud Investigators Association and the International Association of Fraud and Credit Card Investigators Association. These meetings include law enforcement agencies from the local and federal levels and the private sector, such as banks, credit card companies and the credit bureaus. In addition, our existing resources assigned to investigate identity thefts at the Fountain valley Police Department can be used for other investigations as needed. This is crucial at a time of limited financial resources and a limited work force. Typically, Officers assigned to a task force are unavailable for other investigative Department needs. GRAND JURY
F4 Page 1
"Orange County city police departments and the Orange County Sheriff- Coroner Department work cooperatively to develop standardized public information materials, possibly modeled after excellent pamphlets that now exist for use by all departments." Council Action Request RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY IDENTITY THEFT FINDINGS RESPONSE The Fountain Valley Police Department developed a pamphlet several years ago addressing identity theft and has a dedicated page on the Department's website as well. The brochure contains information on how to prevent identity theft, how to report it and numerous other resources available related to the subject matter. This written material has been made available to the public in English and has been shared with numerous state and federal law enforcement agencies. GRAND JURY
F5 Page 1
"Orange County city police departments and the Orange County Sheriff- Coroner Department adopt a standardized identity-theft crime-reporting form, possibly modeled after forms now in use by several police departments." RESPONSE The Fountain Valley Police Department does not currently have a report form dedicated to identity theft. The departments that use such forms developed them for the purpose of having the public complete them. As such, the forms prompt the victim for the information needed. Our Department has a Police Officer or a trained civilian employee obtain the necessary information and write the police report. We do not have the victim complete the report form. As a result, a fill-in- the-blank-style report form is not necessary for our Department. The response to the Grand Jury Report should be made to the Honorable Frederick P. Horn, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, 700 Civic Center Drive West, Santa Ana, CA 92701, with a separate copy and an electronic format (PDF preferred) mailed to the Orange County Grand Jury, 700 Civic Center Drive West, Santa Ana, CA 92701. ALTERNATIVES: Alternative No. 1: Accept the responses to the Grand Jury Report and forward them to the Grand Jury and Judge Horn. Alternative No. 2: Do not accept the responses to the Grand Jury Report and direct Staff to readdress the Grand Jury findings. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: If Council accepts Alternative No. 1, there will be no financial impact to the City. Council Action Request RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY IDENTITY THEFT FINDINGS Page

Recommendations 1

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.