Score: +11 (14/21/3)
Inyo County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

2018 County of Inyo Grand Jury Report*

Published: June 15, 2018 39 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 15 findings

F1
Budgets generally were up to date and well kept.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
All Districts review budget tracking and long-term planning for future expenses. Olancha Community Services District should establish reserve funds to avoid the need of a temporary loan from the county.
F2
Several districts lacked sufficient understanding of the Brown Act.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
All Districts periodically review the Brown Act. Big Pine Fire Protection District review the closed session agenda requirements of the Brown Act.
F3
Districts had potential errors in classifying a worker correctly as an employee or an independent contractor.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
All Districts are recommended to visit the IRS website https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/understanding-employee-vs-contractor-designation.
F4
There is a countywide need for people to serve as board members and volunteers especially Emergency Medical Technicians to serve on ambulances.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
All districts use more expansive outreach that includes newspaper, radio, mailings, and the internet to improve resident participation. Responses Pursuant to Penal Code section 933.05 the following response is required: Olancha Community Services District: R1
F5
The Public Guardian is legally obligated to file periodic accountings with the Court to report on the services rendered and the beginning and ending amounts of both cash and non-cash assets of the estate and all income and expenses in the accounting period. At this time, it is the practice to also request fees for the services of the Public Guardian and the County Counsel for acting as the PG's attorney in filing the petition. In Inyo County, the practice is to file these petitions every two years.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Reports to the court be filed when due at least every 2 years.
F6
The Public Guardian has consistently failed to ask for the fees justified by the Court ordered Public Guardian fees Schedule then in effect.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
A system of oversight to insure timely filings needs to be created and implemented.
F7
There is presently a good system of oversight to be sure that the Public Guardian is giving good care to the conservatees.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
A system of oversight be created to be sure that the Public Guardian always petitions the Court for the fees to which it is reasonably entitled under the law.
F8
There is no system of oversight presently in place in Inyo County to be sure that the Public Guardian is seeking reasonable fees for its services for the benefit of the County tax payers.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
When the Public Guardian in its discretion decides to apply to the Court for lesser or greater amounts than called for by the Public Guardian Fee Schedule, the Guardian should explain in the Petition for fees, which is a public document, why it is not seeking the amount supported by the Court Ordered Fee Schedule.
F9
The reasonable value of the services performed by the Public Guardian as conservator of the conservatee is to be measured at least in part, under both past fee schedules and the newly ordered fee schedule, by the amount of time devoted by the Public Guardian in taking care of the physical, medical and financial needs and concerns of the conservatee.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
To be sure there is some oversight on behalf of the Inyo County taxpayers, now and in the future, copies of all conservatorship accountings be provided both to the County Administrator Budget Analyst and to the County Auditor's Office at the time of filing the Accountings with the Court at the latest and preferably 10 days before filing the Accounting with the Court so that those offices may confer with the Public Guardians office or appear in Court if the interest of the County Taxpayers does not appear to be properly served by the fees requested in the Petition to the Court.
F10
The Public Guardian's office has not, at least in recent years, kept track of the time devoted to taking care of its conservatees.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
The County work with the Public Guardian to assure adequate levels of record keeping and fee calculations and to reasonably compensate the County for the Public Guardians services whether by use of software, personnel or other County office assistance in calculating and processing those fees. Pursuant to Penal Code section 933.05 the following response is required: Public Guardian as to all Findings and all Recommendations. County Counsel's Office as to Findings 4,5,6,8,9,11,13,14 and 15 and all Recommendations. County Administrator's Office, as to Findings 2,3,6,8,13,14 and 15 and Recommendations 1,2,4,5,6,7,8, 9 and 10. County Auditor's Office as to Findings 6,8,13, 14 and 15 and Recommendations 1,2,4,5,6,7,8, 9 and 10. Inyo County Board of Supervisors as to all Findings and Recommendations. Postscript to Report On June 2, a few days after representatives of the County Counsel's Office were interviewed by members of the Grand Jury, possibly as a result of what we considered to be a confidential interview, we received a new ORDER ESTABLISHING PUBLIC GUARDIAN FEES signed May 29, 2018, signed by outgoing Judge Dean Stout. A copy is attached to this report as Exhibit 2. We do not have the time to fully analyze and comment on the new fee schedule. We note that the new schedule is even more dependent on time keeping than the previous two fee schedules which is remarkable in that the Public Guardian's office has not kept time records in recent years and has stated that it has not had the time or personnel to do so. We do not know if any consideration was given to the taxpayers before the new schedule was suddenly adopted. Most importantly, it has not been the purpose of this Grand jury to recommend a new fee schedule. Our purpose has been to recommend that the Public Guardian follow whatever fee schedule is in effect to seek reasonable fees for the benefit of the Inyo County tax payers when the conservatorship estates have sufficient assets to pay fees. It is also our purpose to recommend that when the fee schedule is not being followed, an explanation for the departure be in the petition for fees. Finally, it has been our purpose to recommend a system of oversight as to Public Guardian fee requests by someone who has at heart the interest of County and its taxpayers. Exhibit 1 - 1 Inyo County Superior Court 168 North Edwards Street 2 Post Office Drawer U Independence, California 93526 3 Tel: (760) 878-0218 FILEU 4 JUL 13 2001 5 NAMEY A MONLEY GLERK 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF INYO 90.00 10 STANDING ORDER NO. 01-003 11 In re the Matter of: 100 12 ORDER ESTABLISHING PUBLIC GUARDIAN FEES 13 INYO COUNTY PUBLIC GUARDIAN FEES 14 80 15 16 Good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that the fee 17 schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as 18 Exhibit "B," are presumptively just and reasonable for services 19 provided by the Inyo County Public Guardian as set forth in the 20 attachment Exhibit "A." 21 Pursuant to Probate Code §§ 2623, 2640, and 2942, the Public 22 Guardian shall petition for not more than these fees for such 23 services. In determining whether fees are just and reasonable for 24 a particular estate, the Court shall, among other factors, take 25 into consideration the actual costs of the services provided, the requested might impose an economic hardship on the estate. This fee schedule shall apply to petitions filed after July 2 15, 2001. This order repeals and supersedes the fee schedule 3 established by the Superior Court and the Public Guardian on March 4 1, 1979. 5 6 7 Dated: July 13, 2001 Dean T. Stout Judge of the Superior Court/ 8 Acting Presiding Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 £ - PUBLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES RENDERED A. Regular Services: 1. Visits to clients at place of residence or placement; visits from clients at Public Guardian's office; Contacts with care providers, family, friends, and others; 3. Telephone calls to clients and from clients; Arrange for transportation to court hearings, placements, medical facilities, residences, other locations; Handle correspondence from or to clients, providers of care, vendors, governmental agencies, private and public sector agencies and persons, and relatives and friends; 6. Manage client mail, including change of addresses at post offices, picking up mail at residences or other locations; forwarding of mail to appropriate locations, and cancellation or maintenance of subscriptions or other items of mail; Application, verification, and maintenance of eligibility for private and public benefits, insurance coverage, Medicare/Med.-Cal, and related tasks, appeals, and administrative hearings; 8. Fiscal case management of income, investments, real and personal property; daily weekly, and monthly budgets, and several miscellaneous financial transactions; 9. Respond to urgent and imminent needs regarding changes in placements, medical attention, fiscal needs, and other emergencies; 10. Assist clients in purchasing needed personal items, clothing, food, etc., and coordinate persons and agencies to provide or help with such services. 11. Consult with county counsel regarding legal issues concerning care, placement, personal or financial protection, and estate planning; Coordination and advocacy with public and private agencies, 12. individuals, and programs regarding issues such as patients rights, facility licensing, criminal matters, civil actions and problems, residence status, pending lawsuits, class action suits, and related matters; 13. Prepare petitions, accountings, and orders; coordinate with County Counsel to have legal documents reviewed and consult with County Counsel on all legal proceedings, and appear at Court Hearings as necessary or as directed; All other regular services required pursuant to Probate Code. B. Extraordinary Services: Investments; Note debt service; Small claims/litigation; 4. Dissolutions;
F11
Keeping track of the time spent is not a difficult or time consuming task and several computer programs are available for the purpose.
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
Consult with county counsel regarding legal issues concerning care, placement, personal or financial protection, and estate planning; Coordination and advocacy with public and private agencies,
F12
Only a minimal effort is required to compute the appropriate fee for the Public Guardian using the fee schedule. It is not difficult in larger estates to multiply months of service times the $200 per month allowed in the Schedule.
Related Recommendations (1)
R12
individuals, and programs regarding issues such as patients rights, facility licensing, criminal matters, civil actions and problems, residence status, pending lawsuits, class action suits, and related matters;
F13
While the first priority of the Public Guardian is taking care of the conservatees, the county taxpayers deserve to be reasonably compensated for the services rendered at their expense where there are sufficient assets in the conservatorship to do so.
Related Recommendations (1)
R13
Prepare petitions, accountings, and orders; coordinate with County Counsel to have legal documents reviewed and consult with County Counsel on all legal proceedings, and appear at Court Hearings as necessary or as directed; All other regular services required pursuant to Probate Code. B. Extraordinary Services:
F14
The Public Guardian is consistently late, often very late, in filing its Accounting and reports with the Court.
Related Recommendations (1)
R14
All other regular services required pursuant to Probate Code. B. EXTRAORDINARY SERVICES:
F15
A system of oversight to insure timely filings is not working well.
No recommendations for this finding

Agency Responses 8

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Big Pine Fire Protection District Fire District
Olancha Community Services District Special District

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.