Shasta County Grand Jury • 2008-2009

Shasta County Grand Jury Report

Published: July 07, 2009 170 pages Consolidated Report
Ver PDF original

Findings 3 findings

F1
The Mountain Gate board was advised by its legal counsel that there was no conflict of interest in the hiring of the General Manager. The Grand Jury, however, determined there was the appearance of favoritism when the board lowered the employment standards and hired the former board member to be general manager.
F2
Prior to the board implementing a policy on credit card usage, charges to the district’s credit card were incorrectly reported as fuel expenses when actually they were meals for employees. Although the bylaws allow for a per diem, there is no specific authorization in the bylaws for employees to charge meals on the district’s credit card.
F3
After receiving training, board meetings attended by the Grand Jury were orderly.

Recommendations 3

Commendations 1

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Shasta County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office
Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District Special District