📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

El Dorado County Grand Jury • 2013-2014

El Dorado County Grand Jury 2013-2014 Grading of Boulder Bump Road Case Number Gj-13/14-15

Published: June 15, 2014 4 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 9 findings

F1
Non-paved private roads are notoriously deficient in meeting any standard. Situations like described here are opportunities to bring them to present day standards through a permitting process that embraces those standards.
F2
The lack of information and plans by both the permit applicant and the Planning department make it impossible to validate the complainant’s claim. However, the Grand Jury does find that the Planning and Building Departments were deficient in their analysis of the scope of work for the project, acquisition and inspection of documents germane to the permit and subsequent inspections.
F3
There was no evidence that the Development Services Department verified the existence of the easement and the permit applicant’s legal right to grade it at all, in any manner. Coupled with the improper parcel numbers referenced above the permit should not have been issued.
F4
The permit was for roadway repairs and culvert installation, yet there was no inspection of culverts, but merely an inspection of rough grading, erosion control and a final inspection. Further, the Grand Jury finds that Development Services did not properly administer the County Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance, and should have neither issued the permit nor inspected the work.
F5
The El Dorado County Grading, Erosion, and Sediment Control Ordinance is Chapter 15.14 of the County Code. It is the law of El Dorado County. Public officials failed to follow the provisions of the Grading Ordinance; they failed to follow the law.
F6
There was insufficient communication and interaction between the Development Services and Air Quality Management departments.
F7
DOT was unable to recover the cost of cleaning up the washout. It did not have any record that it was actually done.
F8
All County permit fees paid were later refunded by Board of Supervisors agenda item 11-1161 without explanation.
F9
The El Dorado County Grading Ordinance may put undue burden on simple maintenance of rural roads when strict adherence to the Ordinance is practiced.

Recommendations 5

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

El Dorado County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office
Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District Transit Authority