Score: +5
(9/6/4)
San Diego County Grand Jury
• 2022-2023
Housing in San Diego County
Published: October 03, 2022
17 pages
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 6 findings
F01
The City of Lemon Grove met its housing allocation for all the income categories identified by SANDAG in the Fifth RHNA Cycle.
F02
The County of San Diego failed to meet their housing allocation for all income levels. 50 https://yigby.org/about-yigby/#top 51 San Diego Union-Tribune, Michael Smolens Column: “Effort to ease housing construction on church land gets a new life,” December 21, 2022 52 https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/legislation 53 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB4 54 https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/research-and-policy/faith-based-housing-development. 55https://www.cityofsolanabeach.org/sites/default/files/Solana%20Beach/Community%20Development/Housing% 20Element%20Update/Solana%20Beach%20Housing%20Element%20Update_February2023_Clean.pdf 11
F03
The following cities did not meet their housing allocations for all income categories: Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach and Vista.
F04
The San Diego region failed to meet its housing allocations for each of the income categories identified by SANDAG in the Fifth RHNA Cycle. Fact: In 2018, the City of El Cajon implemented its Transit District Specific Plan to transform the area around the El Cajon Transit Center and increase the housing stock in that area. Fact: In 2013, the City of Chula Vista initiated its Palomar Gateway Specific Plan with the goal of providing housing and mixed-use development near the Palomar Street trolley station.
F05
Specific plans are useful tools in spurring development, including housing development, and have been used by El Cajon and Chula Vista among others. Fact: In November 2016, Santa Clara County voters approved Measure A – the $950 million affordable housing bond measure. Fact: As of June 2022, Santa Clara County’s Measure A funding has been used to create new apartments and housing developments, pay to renovate housing, and allocate money to a first- time homebuyer program. Fact: In 2019 the Bay Area Financing Housing Authority was authorized for the San Francisco Bay Area with the express intention of raising money to finance development of additional housing throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. Fact: In 2022 the Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions agency was formed with ability to raise money to finance development of additional housing throughout Los Angeles. Fact: The City of Seattle recently implemented a payroll tax on select companies. This year companies with sales of more than $7,386,494 per year are taxed on the number of employees making more than $158,282 per year. Over 500 companies paid the tax. Fact: Currently, the City of San Diego levies a Housing Impact Fee on commercial development and the funds levied are deposited into the City’s Affordable Housing Fund. Monies in that fund are used by the San Diego Housing Commission to develop its programs for affordable housing development, housing vouchers, etc. Fact: In California, Santa Clara County and the San Francisco Bay and Los Angeles areas are using or are planning to use the financing authority given to them to fund the current and future development of affordable housing. Fact: Housing impact fees are used to generate funds for affordable housing by the City of San Diego. Fact: In Seattle, the City is using its authority to levy taxes to fund the current and future development of affordable housing. Fact: cityLAB identified school districts as government entities that have land available for construction of affordable housing, particularly for employees of the district. Fact: SFUSD identified underutilized land it owned and is developing it, in conjunction with the City of San Francisco, into a residential community with housing set aside for district employees. Fact: The Santa Clara School District constructed workforce housing for its personnel more than a decade ago. Fact: The University of California at Irvine developed housing on the campus for full-time university employees and their families. Fact: North County Transit District is making surplus land available for development at several locations under its ownership or control. Fact: North County Transit District recently agreed to develop land it controls, in conjunction with a developer, for a mixed-use development at the Oceanside Transit Center. The development is to include affordable housing. Fact: The Metropolitan Transit System has identified surplus land available for development at several locations under its ownership or control. Fact: The Metropolitan Transit System is working with a housing developer to construct affordable housing at its Beyer Boulevard Trolley Station. Fact: YIGBY San Diego, a local group, is working with religious institutions in the San Diego region to develop affordable housing on land owned or controlled by those institutions. Fact: YIGBY San Diego is working with Bethel AME church, to build an affordable housing development for veterans in the City of San Diego. Fact: The Terner Center of Housing Innovation identified religious institutions as potentially having land available for construction of affordable housing.
F06
Both transit agencies in San Diego County (NCTD and MTS) have made land available for development and are actively developing projects that include housing, among other uses. 13
Recommendations 9
-
23-01Page 14Consider, if they have not done so, using specific plans (as defined by
-
23-02Page 14Consider working with school districts and community college
-
23-03Page 14Consider working with local religious institutions within their
-
23-04Page 14Consider drafting revenue-generating legislation at the jurisdiction
-
23-05Page 14Consider providing legislative support to re-introducing in the State
-
23-06Page 14Consider providing legislative support to SB4, which is currently
-
23-07Page 15Consider requesting proposals for development at the NCTD Coaster
-
23-08Page 15Continue working with the North County Transit to identify land
-
23-09Page 15Continue working with the Metropolitan Transit District to identify
Agency Responses 7
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
▶
City of Chula Vista
July 11, 2023
•
4 pages
• 7 responses
View Details ▾
7 responses to findings and recommendations
23-01
Consider, if they have not done so, using specific plans (as defined by
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Recommendation 23-05
Consider providing legislative support to re-introduce in the State Legislature SB1105, or similar legislation, to create a San Diego County agency that could raise revenue for housing. Response: The City of Chula Vista does not support this recommendation. While the City recognizes the critical role of government in subsidizing the delivery of housing and supports the development of new funding tools and mechanisms for same, existing governmental systems are sufficient. A new agency would add unnecessary bureaucracy.
Recommendation 23-06
Consider providing legislative ...
23-02
Consider working with school districts and community college
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Chula Vista supports this recommendation. We are currently working with a developer to deliver housing on a site formerly owned by a school district and are working with Southwestern College to better understand how student housing and other opportunities for affordable family housing could be delivered on their campus.
23-03
Consider working with local religious institutions within their
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
with an affordable housing developer on the financing and construction of a 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 www.chulavistaca.gov (619) 691-5031
. permanent supportive housing project on a site that was previously owned by a religious institution (this particular institution elected to work with an affordable housing developer to develop a portion of their site). We also regularly meet with religious institutions who are interested in undertaking such a project and will continue to do so in the future.
23-04
Consider drafting revenue-generating legislation at the jurisdiction
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
XIIIC of the California Constitution, all local taxes must be approved by a vote of the electorate and cannot be imposed by local legislative action alone. Further, if such a tax were approved by the voters, it would put the City at a further competitive disadvantage in addressing the existing jobs-housing imbalance described in City's response to
23-05
Consider providing legislative support to re-introducing in the State
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Chula Vista does not support this recommendation. While the City recognizes the critical role of government in subsidizing the delivery of housing and supports the development of new funding tools and mechanisms for same, existing governmental systems are sufficient. A new agency would add unnecessary bureaucracy.
23-06
Consider providing legislative support to SB4, which is currently
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
of the City's adopted Legislative Platform is the maintenance of local control, including a policy of opposing measures that seek to preempt local control without the concurrence of the City. SB4 is just such a measure. It is also worth noting that SB4 allows for by right development of housing on land owned by independent institutions of higher education (nonprofit, private colleges), in addition to land owned by religious institutions. The compatibility of residential uses must be analyzed on a site-by-site basis and attempts from the state to preempt local zoning cannot be supported by the ...
23-09
Continue working with the Metropolitan Transit District to identify
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Chula Vista supports this recommendation. The City is currently partnering with the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System ("MTS") in the development of a 10-acre site (includes the E Street trolley station and an adjacent City owned property), into a mixed-use, transit-oriented project incorporating a mix of land uses, including affordable and market rate housing. A request for proposals was issued in 2019, a developer has been selected, and the parties have entered into an exclusive negotiating agreement. The Palomar Street trolley station has also been identified for future resid...
▶
City of Coronado
July 24, 2023
•
3 pages
• 6 responses
•
Score: -2
(+0, 3, -2)
View Details ▾
6 responses to findings and recommendations
23-01
Consider, if they have not done so, using specific plans (as defined by
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
The City of Coronado has already implemented this recommendation. The City has specific plans for the Orange Avenue corridor and Coronado Cays which were adopted in 2003 and 2001, respectively, and include the majority of the City's high density residential (40 dwelling units/acre) parcels.
Judge Smyth July 24, 2023 Page 2 Recommendation 23-02: Consider working with the school districts and community college districts within their jurisdictions to identify developable land for housing owned by districts within their boundaries.
23-02
Consider working with school districts and community college
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
The City of Coronado has already implemented this recommendation. The City has held discussions with District representatives about potential, future workforce housing development on District property. Recommendation 23-03: Consider working with local religious institutions within their jurisdictions to identify land developable for housing, particularly affordable housing.
23-03
Consider working with local religious institutions within their
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
The City of Coronado has already implemented this recommendation. The City has had discussions with religious institutions that own land with adequate development capacity about opportunities for adding affordable housing on their property. Recommendation 23-04: Consider drafting revenue-generating legislation at the jurisdiction level, if feasible and legal e.g., the Seattle Jumpstart Tax. Monies generated by such a tax to fund or assist in funding the construction of housing, particularly affordable housing.
23-04
Consider drafting revenue-generating legislation at the jurisdiction
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
This recommendation will not be implemented because it is infeasible due to scale. Tax measures that may work well for large cities like Seattle with a broad employer base (population of-750,000 with 22,000 businesses) are not suited for small cities such as Coronado (population of -20,000 with 600 businesses and 46% of jobs associated with the military). A tax measure in Coronado modeled on high payroll and individual incomes would not generate adequate revenue within a reasonable timeframe to develop affordable housing. Recommendation 23-05: Consider providing legislative support to re-intro...
23-05
Consider providing legislative support to re-introducing in the State
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
This recommendation will not be implemented due to redundancy with existing agencies. The City of Coronado agrees that lack of funding has been a significant impediment to affordable housing development since the dissolution of redevelopment agencies in 2012. The creation of a new regional government agency with the ability to incur additional public debt and levy new local taxes to produce affordable housing is unwarranted, because the San Diego region is already served by the San Diego Housing Commission, a public housing agency created in 1979 whose mission is to create affordable housing o...
23-06
Consider providing legislative support to SB4, which is currently
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
This recommendation has not yet been implemented but will be within the next 90 days. The City appreciates the time and effort the Grand Jury invested to study this important regional matter and for its report and recommendations. If you have any questions regarding the City ofCoronado's responses, please contact me at (619) 522-7335. Respectfully submitted, Tina Friend City Manager ec: Mayor and City Council
▶
City of Del Mar
July 11, 2023
•
4 pages
View Details ▾
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.
▶
City of El Cajon
July 11, 2023
•
4 pages
• 9 responses
•
Score: +1
(+1, 0, 0)
View Details ▾
9 responses to findings and recommendations
F03
The following cities did not meet their housing allocations for all income categories: Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach and Vista.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
As required in the Regional Housing Needs Assessments, local jurisdictions are not required to construct housing, but rather provide opportunities, primarily through land use and other considerations, for housing to be developed. Most housing in the State of California is built by private corporations and not by a local municipality. This was explained to the Grand Jury during testimony provided by City Manager Graham Mitchell. Furthermore, El Cajon has residential zoning capacity for more than 6,000 housing units, and implemented a streamlined permitting system. Moreover, El Cajon does not ha...
F05
Specific plans are useful tools in spurring development, including housing development, and have been used by El Cajon and Chula Vista among others. Fact: In November 2016, Santa Clara County voters approved Measure A – the $950 million affordable housing bond measure. Fact: As of June 2022, Santa Clara County’s Measure A funding has been used to create new apartments and housing developments, pay to renovate housing, and allocate money to a first- time homebuyer program. Fact: In 2019 the Bay A...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City of El Cajon concurs with this finding. However, if specific plans do not include sufficient development density incentives, they can have little to no effect. In fact, throughout the State, some specific plans work to hamper housing development. In the City of El Cajon, the City Council has adopted specific plans that encourage development. The Grand Jury report referenced the Transit District Specific Plan; however, the City's Downtown Specific Plan has even more capacity for housing development. Between these two specific plans 1,090 housing units have already been planned and analy...
23-01
Consider, if they have not done so, using specific plans (as defined by
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of El Cajon's City Council has adopted two specific plans that encourage the development in housing (one of which was referenced in the Grand Jury report, the other identified in Response to
23-02
Consider working with school districts and community college
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of El Cajon is concerned with land use compatibility issues and impacts on neighborhoods. However, there is nothing in the City's Municipal Code that discourages religious institution property owners from proposing projects, possible re-zones, etc. to accommodate housing development on their sites. .
Response to Grand Jury Report Page 3
23-03
Consider working with local religious institutions within their
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of El Cajon is concerned with land use compatibility issues and impacts on neighborhoods. However, there is nothing in the City's Municipal Code that discourages religious institution property owners from proposing projects, possible re-zones, etc. to accommodate housing development on their sites. .
Response to Grand Jury Report Page 3
23-04
Consider drafting revenue-generating legislation at the jurisdiction
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of El Cajon does not support this recommendation. Unlike the state of Washington, the California Constitution limits the powers of cities to impose a payroll tax on its businesses absent a vote of its resident electors (Cal. Const. Art. XIIIC, Sec. 2) whether a general tax or special tax. Further, the Seattle Jumpstart Tax applies to business payrolls meeting or exceeding at least $7,000,000 in the year the tax is applied, and only applies to salaries or wages of $150,000 in a year, or greater. The City of El Cajon could not follow such a model without the risk of the loss of jobs whe...
23-05
Consider providing legislative support to re-introducing in the State
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of El Cajon rejects this recommendation in that the County has a poor track record for housing development. This would add another layer of government to solving a problem.
23-06
Consider providing legislative support to SB4, which is currently
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of El Cajon rejects any efforts from Sacramento to usurp local land use control, even if the City agrees with the intent of the legislation. Each year, the misguided State legislature passes bills that sound helpful but have almost no impact on the market to development housing. If the State legislature was serious about housing development, it would reduce State regulatory requirements, including onerous storm water regulations, which has removed tens of thousands of possible housing units from the market. It should be noted that the City of El Cajon created a pilot zoning program to...
23-09
Continue working with the Metropolitan Transit District to identify
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of El Cajon concurs with this recommendation. In 2016, the City entered into a "Joint Development Memorandum of Understanding" with the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) for the joint marketing of a potential housing project at a trolley station parking lot at Marshall Avenue and Main Street From that MOU, the City and MTS have attracted the interest of a developer who is currently proposing to develop up to 122 units of affordable housing and 177 units of market rate housing. Negotiations with the developer are underway. Once this project is under construction, the City can...
▶
City of Escondido
July 20, 2023
•
9 pages
• 13 responses
•
Score: +4
(+6, 3, -2)
View Details ▾
13 responses to findings and recommendations
F01
The City of Lemon Grove met its housing allocation for all the income categories identified by SANDAG in the Fifth RHNA Cycle.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City agrees with the Finding.
F02
The County of San Diego failed to meet their housing allocation for all income levels. 50 https://yigby.org/about-yigby/#top 51 San Diego Union-Tribune, Michael Smolens Column: “Effort to ease housing construction on church land gets a new life,” December 21, 2022 52 https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/legislation 53 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB4 54 https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/research-and-policy/faith-based-housing-development. 55https://www.city...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
</b> The City agrees with the Finding.
F03
The following cities did not meet their housing allocations for all income categories: Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach and Vista.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City agrees with the Finding.
F04
The San Diego region failed to meet its housing allocations for each of the income categories identified by SANDAG in the Fifth RHNA Cycle. Fact: In 2018, the City of El Cajon implemented its Transit District Specific Plan to transform the area around the El Cajon Transit Center and increase the housing stock in that area. Fact: In 2013, the City of Chula Vista initiated its Palomar Gateway Specific Plan with the goal of providing housing and mixed-use development near the Palomar Street trolley...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City agrees with the Finding.
F05
Specific plans are useful tools in spurring development, including housing development, and have been used by El Cajon and Chula Vista among others. Fact: In November 2016, Santa Clara County voters approved Measure A – the $950 million affordable housing bond measure. Fact: As of June 2022, Santa Clara County’s Measure A funding has been used to create new apartments and housing developments, pay to renovate housing, and allocate money to a first- time homebuyer program. Fact: In 2019 the Bay A...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City of Escondido agrees with the Finding and already has in place two Specific Plans, the Downtown Specific Plan and South Centre City Specific Plan.
F06
Both transit agencies in San Diego County (NCTD and MTS) have made land available for development and are actively developing projects that include housing, among other uses. 13
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City of Escondido agrees with the Finding and is actively working with NCTD to develop a housing project in Escondido. RECOMMENDATIONS 23-01 THROUGH 23-06, AND 23-08.
23-01
Consider, if they have not done so, using specific plans (as defined by
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The recommendation has already been implemented. The City of Escondido continues to utilize specific plan to facilitate permitting and developing of housing, including affordable housing. The City's Downtown Specific Plan (adopted), South Centre City Specific Plan (adopted), and forthcoming East Valley Specific Plan, create moderate to high density allowances and streamlined permitting processes to facilitate housing development. The East Valley Specific Plan includes a mechanism for affordable housing construction through an in-lieu fee process for any development proposing below a target pro...
23-02
Consider working with school districts and community college
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
The recommendation requires further analysis. The City does not currently work with school districts and community college districts within the City to identify developable land for housing. However, the City continues to maintain cooperative relationships with all school districts and is open to working and collaborating with the school districts to identify district-owned properties that are zoned and/or identified for housing. The anticipated time frame for City Manager review of any proposal to implement this recommendation will be dependent on available staff resources and will not exceed...
23-03
Consider working with local religious institutions within their
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
The recommendation requires further analysis. The City's adopted Sixth Cycle Housing Element's Program 2.1 includes an action to allow for ADUs on places of worship and churches. As part of the Housing Element's Program 3.4, City staff will contact all religious facilities annually to notify them of the forthcoming zoning ordinance modifications to allow for ADUs on religious institutions. The City supports further conversations with local religious institutions to aid in the identification of land developable for housing, including affordable housing. The anticipated time frame for City Manag...
23-04
Consider drafting revenue-generating legislation at the jurisdiction
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The recommendation has already been implemented. The City's forthcoming East Valley Specific Plan, which is a programmatic requirement of the City's adopted Sixth Cycle Housing Element (Programs 1.1 and 1.3), contains an affordable housing trust fund that would be funded through an in-lieu fee derived from a target production point density threshold for development. Funds resulting from the in-lieu fee, which would result from development proposed below the target production point density, would then be used to facilitate affordable housing construction.
23-05
Consider providing legislative support to re-introducing in the State
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted nor is it reasonable. The City of Escondido supports efforts to facilitate housing production for all income levels. However, this legislation suffers from several deficiencies including but not limited to: 1. It would create another expensive regional bureaucracy without adequate voter oversight, similar to SANDAG, which does not always make decisions in the best interest of all of its member agencies, including the City of Escondido; 2. The City would have fractional, and therefore diminished, voting power over the Agency...
23-06
Consider providing legislative support to SB4, which is currently
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted nor is it reasonable. The City of Escondido supports efforts to facilitate housing production for all income levels and desires to work with all property owners in the City on finding opportunities for housing projects. However, this legislation as currently written suffers from several deficiencies including but not limited to: 1. The requirement that Cities ignore local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods and allow "by right" a development project without any opportunity to adopt any reasonable conditions for the dev...
23-08
Continue working with the North County Transit to identify land
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
The recommendation has been implemented. The City has two projects it is working on with NCTD at and around the NCTD Escondido Transit Center (Center). First, NCTD is working to redevelop the Center with a mixed-use development that will include housing, retail and other transit supportive uses. NCTD has received development proposals from prospective developers. The City's Director of Development Services is participating in the selection committee this month to determine which proposal will be selected to move forward.
Exhibit "A" Page 5 of 5 Second, the City and NCTD are partnering on a "l...
▶
City of Imperial Beach
August 14, 2023
•
3 pages
• 8 responses
•
Score: +2
(+2, 0, 0)
View Details ▾
8 responses to findings and recommendations
F03
The following cities did not meet their housing allocations for all income categories: Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach and Vista.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City of Imperial Beach concurs with Finding 03.
F05
Specific plans are useful tools in spurring development, including housing development, and have been used by El Cajon and Chula Vista among others. Fact: In November 2016, Santa Clara County voters approved Measure A – the $950 million affordable housing bond measure. Fact: As of June 2022, Santa Clara County’s Measure A funding has been used to create new apartments and housing developments, pay to renovate housing, and allocate money to a first- time homebuyer program. Fact: In 2019 the Bay A...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The City of Imperial Beach concurs with Finding 05.
23-01
Consider, if they have not done so, using specific plans (as defined by
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Imperial Beach concurs with
23-02
Consider working with school districts and community college
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Imperial Beach concurs with
23-03
Consider working with local religious institutions within their
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Imperial Beach concurs with
23-04
Consider drafting revenue-generating legislation at the jurisdiction
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Imperial Beach does not support
23-05
Consider providing legislative support to re-introducing in the State
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Imperial Beach does not support
23-06
Consider providing legislative support to SB4, which is currently
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The City of Imperial Beach does not support
▶
City of Vista
July 18, 2023
•
4 pages
• 1 response
View Details ▾
1 response to findings and recommendations
F03
The following cities did not meet their housing allocations for all income categories: Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach and Vista.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
In accordance with State law, local jurisdictions are not required to construct 0 housing, but rather provide opportunities and appropriate zoning, primarily through land use and other considerations, for housing to be developed. Most housing in the State of California is built by private corporations and not by a local municipality. Vista complies with the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) and has residential zoning capacity for more than 2,561 housing units. The City recently adopted the 2021-2029 Housing Element (6th Cycle) to our General Plan that describes how we plan to incentiviz...
No Responses Found 5
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.