San Mateo County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

Student Mental Health:

Published: January 15, 2015 125 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 12 findings

F1
National statistics show the need for mental health support for K-12 students. Statistics in San Mateo County’s Adolescent Report 2014-15 reflect this same pattern for students in San Mateo County.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
According to published studies, schools are one of the best places to address this need. Ibid. Kirsten Fawcett, “How to Talk to Kids and Teens about Mental Illness,” US News and World Report, September 23, 2014. http://health.usnews.com/health-news/health-wellness/articles/2014/09/23/how-to-talk-to-kids-and-teens-about-mental-illness. Ibid. Officials from the San Mateo Union High School District, SELPA, and StarVista: interviews by the Grand Jury. Elena Kadvany, “Ravenswood School District to Integrate Mindfulness, Yoga into Regular Curriculum,” Palo Alto Weekly, January 22, 2015. http://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2015/01/22/ravenswood-school-district-to-integrate-mindfulness-yoga- into-regular-curriculum.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Of the County’s 94,000 public school K-12 students, more than 33,000 are publicly insured general education students. BHRS can treat such students on campus upon request.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Not all County schools accommodate on-campus treatment for general education publicly insured students, even though BHRS could provide it.
Related Recommendations (3)
R1
Provide a broad spectrum of mental health services and support—ranging from mental health education to one-on-one counseling—to all students on campus during the school day.
R2
Provide BHRS full access to campuses to treat publicly insured general education students if the students and their parents so desire. The San Mateo County Grand Jury recommends that the County Office of Education:
R3
The San Mateo County Grand Jury recommends that the County Office of Education: Work closely with school districts to develop mental health programs and allow for access by BHRS to treat its eligible students. The COE should assist schools in investigating all sources of funds, including Measure A.
F5
Lack of transportation to off-campus appointments can be a barrier to treatment for both publicly and privately insured students.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
About 60% of publicly insured general education students needing treatment for mental health issues were not seen in school and had to seek transportation to a BHRS clinic.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
About 61,000 County students, or 65%, are privately insured. BHRS does not treat privately insured students on an ongoing basis; such students are referred to their private health insurers. Therapists paid by private insurance do not provide services on campus.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Provide a broad spectrum of mental health services and support—ranging from mental health education to one-on-one counseling—to all students on campus during the school day.
F8
Nonprofit CBOs currently provide student programs for mental health support and one-on- one counseling on some K-12 campuses. These services are open to any student who needs them.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Potential funding sources for CBO services include a school’s general budget, parent groups, local foundations, and Measure A.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The San Mateo County Grand Jury recommends that the County Office of Education: Work closely with school districts to develop mental health programs and allow for access by BHRS to treat its eligible students. The COE should assist schools in investigating all sources of funds, including Measure A.
F10
In 2014, the County Office of Education created the position of Director of Safe and Supportive Schools, partially funded by Measure A, to coordinate mental health activities on school campuses.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The San Mateo County Grand Jury recommends that the County Office of Education: Maintain and prioritize the position of Director of Safe and Supportive Schools. The COE should solidify its independent role as an in-school mental health service facilitator and advocate for increased funding for all students.
F11
Not all schools in the County keep comprehensive and accurate data on mental health issues that surface in the school setting. Nor is there a comprehensive summary and count of all the CBOs and programs offered to students across the County. Thus it is difficult to track mental health trends among local students or to measure the success of programs.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The San Mateo County Grand Jury recommends that the County Office of Education: Work with all school districts to set up accurate record-keeping systems of all student mental health issues that surface on campus and CBOs providing services to schools, while protecting student confidentially. These statistics will provide data to measure the effectiveness of mental health services. The San Mateo County Grand Jury recommends that the County’s elementary and unified school districts:
F12
Identification and early treatment of mental health issues in the lower grades can lead to reduced stigma and improved outcomes for all students.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The San Mateo County Grand Jury recommends that the County Office of Education: Focus on providing mental health programs and services at the K-8 level. Such early mental health education would have the added benefit of reducing stigma before it develops further.

Comments 22

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

San Mateo County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office
San Mateo County Office of Education Agency