⚠️ Translation Notice:
This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected:
F3, F4, F5, F6
Findings and Recommendations
5 findings
Illicit fentanyl is a pervasive problem in Agree. The Orange County. Respondent agrees with the finding
No recommendations for this finding
Orange County will benefit by establishing a Agree. The FVSD has a strong partnership with chartered multi-agency Task Force to address Respondent our fire department which has the fentanyl crisis in Orange County. agrees with the provided training and materials to finding house our Narcan.
No recommendations for this finding
As long as there is a demand, producers will Agree. The find ways to supply drugs. Orange County Respondent cannot law enforce its way out of the fentanyl agrees with the crisis. Education, prevention, and treatment finding are critical to reducing demand.
No recommendations for this finding
There is a need to increase public awareness Agree. The and acknowledgement of the risks of illicit Respondent fentanyl. agrees with the finding
No recommendations for this finding
Some educational institutions are not Disagree. The While FVSD cannot speak for all participating in available educational and Respondent schools, we do partner with FVFD and preventive fentanyl/drug programs. disagrees have trained our nurses and health wholly or assistants in the use of Narcan and partially with the warning signs. We are looking to finding (see expand this training. right for explanation) Please see below for the responses to each required Recommendation (1, 5, and 6) as requested in the Orange County Grand Jury report and attached cover letter dated June 14, 2023. R#
No recommendations for this finding
