Orange County Grand Jury
• 2005-2006
• Agency Response
City Cops Thomas G. Mauk are Sharing Information - Why Not the County?*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 1 findings
F6
Page 1
1 have been satisfactorily addressed, the CEO's position will remain the same. County participation in COPLINK®: The OCSD, the Probation Department, and 7.2 the District Attorney should determine whether the concerns given for not participating in COPLINK® still exist and if not, reconsider their participation in COPLINK® by the fourth quarter, 2006 Response: The
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.