San Diego County Grand Jury • 2006-2007

Conditions and Management of Detention Facilities in San Diego County

Published: January 22, 2007 23 pages
View Original PDF

Findings 1 findings

F2006 Page 1
Other facility inspections were completed in November, 2005. Finding: All areas were in compliance. Cleaning fluids and chemicals were safely stored. Weapons lockers were located outside the perimeter of the modules (cells) and were well secured. The kitchen area was clean and responsibly run. Finding: Understaffing continues to be a concern. Recruitment is difficult which seems to be a universal problem within the Sheriff’s Department. Fact: The exterior and interior conditions of the facility were in very good condition. The jail facility was clean and well maintained. Fact: Orientation of Inmates: Appeared to be effective with regard to facility rules and procedures. Grievance procedures for inmates are in effect and well documented. Fact: Quality of Life: Educational courses provided by Grossmont Adult Education for high school is available for those inmates who request it. Although the length of stay for most inmates is minimal, their educational records travel with them when transferring to a different facility. Additional training for anger management and woodworking is also provided. Recreation areas were Spartan, although well maintained. Contact sports are not permitted. Limited physical fitness equipment is available. Fact: The facility is lacking in effective video surveillance/recording units. The reduced staff cannot adequately investigate physical altercations that may occur in areas not covered by cameras. Finding: Additional cameras would provide information to the staff so intelligent correctional measures could be made.

Recommendations 14

Commendations 1