⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 3 findings
F1
Page 124
The CGJ found that change in the executive-level management has resulted in improved transparency, staff morale, and cooperation with outside agencies.
F2
Page 124
Current First 5 LA executive management has been responsive to the audit findings and recommendations.
F3
Page 124
First 5 LA has made significant progress in implementing the audit recommendations.
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 2211. It takes a community. The Director of DCFS should incorporate in the new departmental strategic plan the philosophy that: “It takes a community to mitigate the number of child deaths.” DCFS must look both inside and outside of the organization to identify, coordinate, and collaborate with its sister agencies and community partners to build an effective child protection system. The Task Force was particularly supportive of more effective collab- oration, building on the DMH model of “It Takes a Community” to mitigate the number of child deaths in Los Angeles County. 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 193 CHILD DEATH MITIGATION Most child deaths are, directly or indirectly, the result of ignorance or poor parenting that is often rooted in drug addiction, mental instability, and domestic violence. Reducing the numbers of deaths will take a coordinated effort by: The Los Angeles County departments and agencies involved with children Police departments in other jurisdictions Mandated reporters (e.g., physicians, educators, sworn officers) State and Federal legislative and oversight agencies Community at large They will need to: Collaborate closely to identify high-risk situations Implement effective interventions in these high-risk situations Follow up to ensure the interventions are working or make appropriate course corrections These three priorities seem straight-forward, but they are often complicated because of conflicting protocols, limited communication, and poor coordination of efforts. The fol- lowing recommendations seek to address these areas through a collaborative approach by applying the conceptual model of “It Takes a Community” and represent changes that have the best chance cumulatively to result in a reduction of child deaths.
-
R2Page 2251. Refined decision-making tools. The Director of DCFS should work with the SDM® vendor14 to refine the SDM® assessment tools.15 The CGJ was advised by staff that there are a number of areas that need to be updated and im- proved to provide more accurate assessments.
-
R3Page 2281. A 23-hour assessment center. The Director of DCFS should evaluate the potential for implementing a 23-hour assessment center for children who are at risk, and seek BOS approval based on the results of that evaluation. Such assessment centers, similar to Orangewood in Orange County, California, are staffed with skilled professionals, similar to DCFS CSWs, DMH psychiatric social work- ers, and DPH public health nurses. They can build trust and assess the child in a safe environment, and are more likely to make accurate assessments and appropriate placements if deemed necessary. This recommendation is similar to one made by the CGJ in 1999-2000. (Note: The in- tent of this recommendation is not to replicate the McLaren model of the past.) Given the size of the County, DCFS should pilot one 23-hour assessment center and, once fully operational, evaluate its relative effectiveness and determine if additional centers are warranted.
-
R6Page 14. DCFS and Probation should assess and develop new strategies for their respective AWOL dependents and wards. Status and Response Partially Implemented - On-going Our Countywide Runaway Outreach Unit (ROU) Program is currently providing services for 398 youth. The ROU CSW is utilized as a resource and secondary service provider to locate and stabilize youth, and reduce the recidivism of running away episodes. The CSW works with the more hardened youth population that lives outside the scope of established policies and protocols. The ROU is incident driven and immediate placement stabilization that can make long term planning possible. In 2010 a meeting was held between the DCFS ROU Program Manager and Probation to discuss Probation's development of a "Probation" ROU program. However, Probation reported having a lack of resources to implement a similar program. The DCFS ROU supervisor participates in a workgroup with DCFS, Court, Probation, and Mental Health to address the needs of At-Risk youth and cross-over youth. 9. DCFS and Probation should strategically use congregate care facilities that meet quality assurance standards and provide awards for achieving meaningful outcomes. Partially Implemented - July, 2012 9.1. DCFS and Probation should study how best to improve group home facilities’ programs, staffing skills and staffing levels. Partially Implemented - To Be Determined 368 DCFS has met with the Probation Department on monitoring the quality of care and service delivery congregate care facilities provide to place youth. As these discussions move forward, plans will be underway to determine how to best acknowledge providers who achieve meaningful outcomes. On December 2, 2010, DCFS and DMH implemented a two-year demonstration pilot called Residentially Based Services (RBS). The data to date show promise, but it is too early to decide on effectiveness or expansion. The vision is for RBS to be the new model for group home care with an emphasis on permanency and creative strategies to move youth safely back into the community as quickly as possible with no recidivism. 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT DCFS REVIEW – EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 2 – UPDATED STATUS – GRAND JURY REPORTS 2006 – 2010 The following provides the status of the recommendations made in the 2006 through 2010 Civil Grand Jury Reports. The Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) has implemented 75 of the 121 recommendations and made significant progress in the remainder. Each year is summarized for easy review. 2009 – 2010 Child Abuse Reporting and Response Report The Grand Jury's review was precipitated by the implementation of a system to speed up and standardize the reporting of and response to Suspected Child Abuse Reports to law enforcement agencies. The Grand Jury made recommendations to strengthen and formalize the interfaces among responding agencies. There were a total of eight recommendations of which five have been fully implemented and three are partially implemented (see Exhibit 1-A). We have highlighted some of our accomplishments, as follows: We have fully implemented the Electronic Suspected Child Abuse Report (E-SCAR) system, and we meet regularly with law enforcement partners. We also developed a draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) however, given the development of various enhancements to the E-SCAR system, it has not been finalized. We anticipate the MOU will be finalized by January 2012. DCFS Social workers are co-located in seven of 21 Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) stations, six of 23 Los Angeles Sheriff Department (LASD) Agencies, and six of 46 independently run law enforcement agencies. We have updated our MOU with LASD and are drafting an Operational Agreement with the Independent Agencies to ensure uniformity and best practice. We are in full agreement that co-location of social workers at law enforcement facilities will help promote better communication and will continue working with our partners to strengthen our partnerships. 2008 – 2009 The Plight of At-Risk Youth in Los Angeles County Report The Grand Jury Report details the
Conclusions 10
-
CL1 Page 431Urban Water Management Planning Act (Water Code Section 10630 et. Seq.) requires that a water supplier prepare a plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the sup- plier's service area, including actions to facilitate the installation of dual distribution sys- tems, to promote recirculating uses, to facilitate the increased use of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, and to overcome any obstacles to achieving that increased use.
-
CL2 Page 431According to State law, “It is hereby declared that the people of the state have a primary interest in the development of facilities to recycle water containing waste to supplement existing surface and underground water supplies and to assist in meeting the future wa- ter requirements of the state” (Wat. Code § 13510). The state strengthens its purpose by stating in the Water Code that under certain conditions the use of potable water for nonpotable purposes is a waste or unreasonable use of water if recycled water is availa- ble (Wat. Code § 13550 et seq.).
-
CL3 Page 431State Recycled Water Act: requires the use of 1M af of recycled water by 2020 and 2M af of recycled water statewide by 2030.
-
CL4 Page 431State Recycled Water Policy: the State Water Resources Control Board has adopted a recycled water policy. The Policy’s stated goal is to use as much recycled water as pos- sible. The State Board is the ultimate approving agency for all recycled water projects.
-
CL5 Page 431State Water Resources Control Board also requires recycled water use as a part of their waste discharge requirements. In 1984, the State Water Board issued Water Quality Or- der No. 84-7 expressing the intent that, pursuant to California Water Code, Section 13142.5(e), in cases where discharges of wastewater to the ocean are proposed in “wa- ter-short” areas, the report of waste discharge should include an explanation as to why the effluent is not being recycled for further beneficial use (SWQCB, 1984).
-
CL6 Page 431SBx7-7 mandates that urban water suppliers reduce statewide water use (in gallons per capita per day) of 10 percent by 2015 and 20 percent by 2020 (20x2020). Methods of complying with SBx7-7 include enhanced water conservation, water use efficiency, and recycled water use.
-
CL7 Page 431Grant eligibility, the Department of Water Resources conditions any grant application on a demonstration, through the documentation in an approved Urban Water Management Plan, that the water provider is on target to meet its 20x2020 goals including the use of recycled water.
-
CL8 Page 431Integrated Regional Water Management Planning, the awarding of grants is predicated on the grantee agreeing to the follow term in the Department of Water Resources Grant Agreement: Since the Grantee’s IRWM region (region) receives water supplied from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta), then the region’s IRWM Plan (existing or any fu- ture update) must help reduce dependence on the Delta for water supply. Other than conservation, the primary way to reduce this dependence is through the substitution of recycled water for potable supplies. 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 385 386 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:61)(cid:61)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:49) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:50)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:51)(cid:51)(cid:47)(cid:47)(cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:29)(cid:29) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:60)(cid:60) (cid:50)(cid:50)(cid:41)(cid:41) (cid:47)(cid:47)(cid:50)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:42) (cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:43)(cid:43) (cid:56)(cid:56)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:88)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:71) (cid:51)(cid:51)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:15)(cid:15) (cid:53)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:87) (cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:74)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:15)(cid:15) (cid:51)(cid:51)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:78)(cid:78)(cid:88)(cid:88)(cid:83)(cid:83) (cid:51)(cid:51)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:81) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:50)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:40) (cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:53)(cid:54)(cid:54) (cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:69)(cid:69)(cid:69)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:76) (cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85) (cid:164)(cid:164) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:75)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:85) (cid:47)(cid:47)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:75)(cid:75) (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:73) (cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:74)(cid:71)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:72) (cid:60)(cid:60)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:43)(cid:43)(cid:82)(cid:82) (cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:68) (cid:47)(cid:47)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:74) 61 egaP MP 31:4 2102/11/6 SBAT YTNUOCAL:sbaT 4 Long Beach CITIZEN COMPLAINT: CITY OF LONG BEACH Unfunded Pension, Retirement Age, Pickup Pension INTRODUCTION The 2011–2012 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury (CGJ) received a complaint against the City of Long Beach from a group of citizens. (Refer to Citizen Complaint Summary: Case # 25) The complainants focused on three areas:
-
CL9 Page 462The function of the Continuity Committee is primarily archival and organizational, main- taining legally-mandated records and passing on to each succeeding CGJ an orderly library and filing system of investigated agencies. The CC found that it was able to make productive use of some of the information left behind by previous CGJ. However, rather than directly following the previously established tracking system, the revised tabular format included here was created for the recording of responses from public agencies that more closely matches the actual language expressed in CPC §933.05. 404 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT CONTINUITY COMMITTEE Responses s n t o n a t i d n t e m e Report Title P a g e Agency c o m m e n d A g r e e D i s a g r e e m p l e m e n t e l l I m p l e m e o r e s p o n s n o t I m p l e R e I W i N i l l W 1a 1 1b 2 5 1c 3 Post Adoptions Services - DCFS 1d 4 Where are you? 2 5 6 3 6 4 7 1 8 9 City of Long 2 A Whistleblower's Complaint 15 Beach 3 10 4 11 Alhambra PD 1 12 Bell PD 1 13 27 Bell Gardens PD 1 14 Beverly Hills PD 1 15 Burbank PD 1 16 Covina PD 1 17 Gardena PD 1 18 Glendale PD 1 19 E-Subpoena - One Way to End Glendora PD 1 20 the Paper Chase Huntington Park 1 PD 21 28 LAFD 1 22 LAUSD PD 1 23 Manhattan Beach 1 PD 24 Monrovia PD 1 25 Monterey Park PD 1 26 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 405 CONTINUITY COMMITTEE Responses s n t o n a t i d n t e m e Report Title P a g e Agency c o m m e n d A g r e e D i s a g r e e m p l e m e n t e l l I m p l e m e o r e s p o n s n o t I m p l e R e I W i N i l l W Pasadena PD 1 27 Redondo Beach 1 PD 28 San Fernando PD 1 29 San Gabriel PD 1 30 South Pasadena 1 PD 31 E-Subpoena - One Way to End Torrance PD 1 32 28 the Paper Chase West Covina PD 1 33 Whittier PD 1 34 Inglewood City 2 Atty 35 LAPD 3 36 3 37 LASD 4 38 DA 5 39 1a 40 1b 41 DA 1c 42 1d 43 1e 44 45 High Tech Forensics and 2a 43- Cyber Security Crime Fighting 2b 46 44 Arcadia PD in the Digital Age 2c 47 2d 48 2a 49 2b 50 Beverly Hills PD 2c 51 2d 52 406 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT CONTINUITY COMMITTEE Responses s n t o n a t i d n t e m e Report Title P a g e Agency c o m m e n d A g r e e D i s a g r e e m p l e m e n t e l l I m p l e m e o r e s p o n s n o t I m p l e R e I W i N i l l W 2a 53 2b 54 LAPD 2c 55 2d 56 2a 57 2b 58 Culver City PD 2c 59 2d 60 2a 61 2b 62 Downey PD 2c 63 2d 64 2a 65 2b 66 Glendale PD 2c 67 High Tech Forensics and 68 43- 2d Cyber Security Crime Fighting 44 2a 69 in the Digital Age 2b 70 LASD 2c 71 2d 72 2a 73 2b 74 Santa Monica PD 2c 75 2d 76 2a 77 2b 78 Monrovia PD 2c 79 2d 80 2a 81 82 Redondo Beach 2b PD 2c 83 2d 84 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 407 CONTINUITY COMMITTEE Responses s n t o n a t i d n t e m e Report Title P a g e Agency c o m m e n d A g r e e D i s a g r e e m p l e m e n t e l l I m p l e m e o r e s p o n s n o t I m p l e R e I W i N i l l W 2a 85 2b 86 Torrance PD 2c 87 88 43- 2d 44 2a 89 2b 90 High Tech Forensics and Whittier PD 2c 91 Cyber Security Crime Fighting 2d 92 in the Digital Age 3a 93 LAC CIO 3b 94 95 Auditor / 3a 44 Controller 3b 96 4 97 BOS 5 98 55 1 99 2 100 101 Education Based Incarceration 3 LASD - Hope for Tomorrow 56 4 102 5 103 6 104 1 105 2 106 3 107 Uncollected Medical Bills in the 4 108 County's Three Major Medical 5 109 Facilities: Free County 69 LAC DHS 6 110 Healthcare - Easier Than You 7 111 Think! 8 112 9 113 10 114 408 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT CONTINUITY COMMITTEE Responses s n t o n a t i d n t e m e Report Title P a g e Agency c o m m e n d A g r e e D i s a g r e e m p l e m e n t e l l I m p l e m e o r e s p o n s n o t I m p l e R e I W i N i l l W 1 115 92 2 116 3 117 93 4 118 119 94 5 120 96 6 7 121 City of Los Angeles Dept. of 105 8 122 Water & Power - LADWP 9a 123 Who's Really in the Dark? 9b 124 111 9c 125 9d 126 116 10 127 117 11 128 129 123 12 130 124 13 1 131 2 132 3 133 Sub-Acute Health Facilities - 4 134 Is the Fox Inspecting the 137 LAC DPH 5 135 Henhouse? 6a 136 6b 137 6c 138 The Six Pods of Module 172: 1 139 The Most Dangerous Cells in 146 LASD the County - Whaddya' Mean, 2 No Cameras? 140 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 409 CONTINUITY COMMITTEE Responses s n t o n a t i d n t e m e Report Title P a g e Agency c o m m e n d A g r e e D i s a g r e e m p l e m e n t e l l I m p l e m e o r e s p o n s n o t I m p l e R e I W i N i l l W 1a 141 1b 142 169 1c 143 1d 144 1e 145 1f 146 170 Port of Los Angeles BOHC 1g 147 1h 148 1i 149 1j 150 171 1k 151 2 152 3 153 154 Preferential Parking 1 177 DOT (Permit Street Parking) 2 155 1 156 2 157 3 158 4 159 160 Transition Age Youth (TAY) DCFS & 5 198 Journey LAC Probation 6 161 7 162 8 163 9 164 10 165 1a 166 Whoa! The State of Public 1b 167 Pensions in Los Angeles 250 BOS 2 168 County 3 169 410 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT CONTINUITY COMMITTEE Responses s n t o n a t i d n t e m e Report Title P a g e Agency c o m m e n d A g r e e D i s a g r e e m p l e m e n t e l l I m p l e m e o r e s p o n s n o t I m p l e R e I W i N i l l W 4 170 251 BOS 5 171 6 172 251 LACERA 7 173 1 174 2 175 DWP 3 176 4 177 2 178 264 LACERS 3 179 Whoa! The State of Public 4 180 Pensions in Los Angeles County 2 181 Los Angeles City 3 182 Council 4 183 1 184 273 City of Pasadena 2 185 3 186 187 City of Monterey 1 283 Park 2 188 189 City of Hermosa 1 291 Beach 2 190 1a 191 1b 192 LASD 334 2a 193 Jails Committee 2b 194 3a 195 LAPD 335 3b 196 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT 411 CONTINUITY COMMITTEE ACRONYMS BOHC Board of Harbor Commissioners BOS Board of Supervisors CC Continuity Committee CGJ Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury CPC California Penal Code DA District Attorney DCFS Department of Children and Family Services DOT Department of Transportation LAC CIO Los Angeles County Chief Information Officer LAC DHS Los Angeles County Department of Health Services LAC DPH Los Angeles County Department of Public Health LACERA Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association LACERS Los Angeles City Retirement System LADWP Los Angeles Department of Water and Power LAFD Los Angeles Fire Department LAPD Los Angeles Police Department LASD Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department LAUSD PD Los Angeles Unified School District Police Department PD Police Department 412 2011–2012 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT (cid:39)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:49) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:50)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:40) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:50)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:44)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:40) (cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:53)(cid:54)(cid:54) (cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79) (cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:71) (cid:164)(cid:164) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:75)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:85) (cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:74)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:92) (cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:72) (cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:89)(cid:89)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:71)(cid:82)(cid:82) (cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:80) (cid:41)(cid:41)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:88)(cid:88)(cid:93)(cid:93)(cid:80)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:81) (cid:39)(cid:39)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:68) (cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:81) (cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:74)(cid:71)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:72) (cid:60)(cid:60)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:43)(cid:43)(cid:82)(cid:82) (cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:75)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:81) (cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:88)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:86) (cid:39)(cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:68) (cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:47)(cid:47)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:72) (cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:93)(cid:93)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:75) (cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:89)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:87) (cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:69)(cid:69)(cid:69)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:76) (cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85) (cid:40)(cid:40)(cid:88)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:72) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:85) (cid:46)(cid:46)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:81) (cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:78)(cid:78)(cid:68)(cid:68) (cid:37)(cid:37)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:69)(cid:69) (cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85) (cid:45)(cid:45)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:81) (cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:15)(cid:15) (cid:54)(cid:54)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:47)(cid:47)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:75)(cid:75) (cid:57)(cid:57)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:42)(cid:42)(cid:85)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:73) (cid:36)(cid:36)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:68) (cid:47)(cid:47)(cid:17)(cid:17) (cid:58)(cid:58)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:74) 12 egaP MP 31:4 2102/11/6 SBAT YTNUOCAL:sbaT 4 Detention Committee
-
CL10 Page 473DETENTION COMMITTEE INTRODUCTION California Penal Code §919(b) charges the Civil Grand Jury (CGJ) with the duty of in- quiring into the conditions and management of the public detention facilities within its designated County. The 2011-2012 CGJ focused on the Los Angeles County detention facilities that were not inspected by the 2010-2011 CGJ. Also inspected were those de- tention facilities that were noted in previous CGJ reports as unsatisfactory in some sig- nificant manner, as well as those facilities that were found to be excellent in 2010-2011.
Comments 5
-
CO1 Page 506Minimum of two (2) CGJ members on an inspection to Jail/Detention facilities. Please watch your “VISIT TIME LIMIT”.
-
CO2 Page 506CGJ member MUST always wear their CGJ ID Badge at the site.
-
CO3 Page 506Please bring and present your CGJ business card to the Watch Commander or Escort on Duty.
-
CO4 Page 506Explain that you are from the Civil Grand Jury and are there to perform an inspection of the site.
-
CO5 Page 506This is a requirement of the: dated 2008 Los Angeles Penal Code section 888 through 939.91, and Government Code sec- tions 3060-3075, 27100-27101, 68070-68114.10.