Humboldt County Grand Jury
• 2009-2010
• Agency Response
Humbolcdotu Nty Association Governments*
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
F1
A review of items on the agendas and minutes verified the disparity between state law requirements and the RHNA process at HCAOG. This process dictates a two-year timeframe to allow for ample public participation.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
That HCAOG adhere to the two-year requirement for the development of RHNA, as required by state law. This will allow for adequate public participation. Proposed HCAOG Board Responses to F.1. and R.1: The HCAOG Board partially disagrees with the finding and will implement the recommendation. The Report section of the Grand Jury report erroneously states that the "two-year time period began in Spring 2009". The two-year time period began on August 30, 2007 with the transmittal of the Regional Housing Needs Determination sent from the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to the HCAOG Executive Director. The letter, which is provided in
F2
It appears from a review of the Brown Act, that one posting available to the public for 72 hours satisfies the minimum requirement; however, the location is not one the public is likely to visit.
No recommendations for this finding
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.