Yolo cOuNT Y GRANd JuRYP

Brown Act training has been conducted for all 2009-December 31, 2011 for $5,430,000 plus projected current Board members as recommended by the costs of $2,000,000 plus yield maint enance and pre- 2007-2008 Grand Jury. payment penalties (actual cost not identified). Option 3 – Purchase building between January 1, F-2 The Board has initiated a program to ensure 2012-March 31, 2012 for $5,430,000 plus projected future Board members receive Brown Act costs of $2,000,000. (The Trustees and WJUSD staff training within six months of taking office, and attending the April 8, 2009 meeting indicated that this current members receive refresher training every is the option they hope to exercise, as it does not include two years, but that requirement has not yet been pre-payment costs.) incorporated into written Board policy. Option 4 – Purchase building between April 1, F-3 The WJUSD has placed itself in an untenable 2012-June 30, 2016 for $5,430,000 plus projected and very costly position with regard to its current costs of $2,000,000 plus an additional $1 million. lease agreement on the Blue Shield property. 10 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt ReCoMMendAtionS ACtionS tAKen 09-01 The Board should continue its Brown Act train- Members of the Grand Jury met with the Detention ing plan and incorporate training requirements Commander and Correctional Lieutenants on September 9, into its written policy and procedures as soon as 2008 to schedule the jail visit and to obtain background possible. information, results of previous inspections conducted by other agencies, and the facility procedures manual. 09-02 It is imperative that the Board utilize the most On October 1, 2008, the Detention Commander and effective and immediate funding mechanism two Correctional Lieutenants conducted a thorough tour of to ensure that the property known as the Blue the detention center for jury members. The tour included Shield building be purchased under the terms of the booking area, inmate housing, control centers, medical Option 3 as described above. facility, kitchen and laundry, an inmate transport vehicle, and the Leinberger unit. The staff provided comprehensive ReQueSt FoR ReSponSe information on all aspects of jail operations as the tour Pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 933(c) progressed, and answered questions posed by the jury. The and 933.05, the Yolo County Grand Jury requests a visit lasted approximately five hours and included lunch response as follows: served in the staff conference room. From the following governing body: While reviewing individual P & Ps in the Monroe Detention Center Policy and Procedures Manual, it was Woodland Joint Unified School District Board of noticed that a majority of P & Ps had an effective date Trustees (Findings F-2 and F-3; Recommendations 09- of 2003 or earlier, and that most had no audit date 01 and 09-02) entered. The detention center’s governing directive for the manual, “Establishment of a Detention Facilities Policy Monroe detention Center and Procedures Manual” (S.O. No. A-600), requires that the manual be reviewed by a designated committee, and SuMMARY audited separately, at least annually (Procedures paragraphs The 2008-2009 Yolo County Grand Jury visited A and G apply). the Monroe Detention Center (Yolo County Jail) to A spreadsheet (Appendix A) was developed, listing observe and assess its operation. The visit included a P & P identifying data, effective date, review date, audit walk-through briefing of jail facilities and observation of date and references to display in table format the scope various confinement processes. The jury was impressed of the suspected problem. with professional attitude of the staff and overall condition During analysis of individual P & Ps, it was decided of the facility. The jail is operating at maximum capacity to limit review of references to those most commonly and must be expanded. cited – California Penal Code and California Code of In conjunction with the jail visit, a review was Regulations, Title 15. conducted of the detention center’s Policy and Procedures Manual, focusing primarily on currency of individual WHAt tHe JuRY deteRMined Policies and Procedures (P & Ps), and applicability of references contained therein. The study revealed that most Jail visit P & Ps have an effective date of 2003 or earlier, have no Based on the in-depth tour of the facility and record of having been reviewed and audited annually as comprehensive briefing by senior staff officers, the Monroe required, and many references are inaccurate. Detention Center is well maintained, well organized and well run. Staff personnel encountered appeared well trained, ReASon FoR viSit confident, competent and professional. California Penal Code, section 919(b) provides that: The staff is burdened with stringent inmate segregation “The Grand Jury shall inquire into the conditions and requirements, as delineated by the California Penal management of public prisons within the county.” Pursuant Code, sections 4001 and 4002 and the California Code to that statute, the Grand Jury visited the Monroe Detention of Regulations, Title 15, sections 1050 and 1053. The Center (including the Walter J. Leinberger Memorial facility operates at or near maximum capacity most of Detention Center) located at 2420 East Gibson Road in the time. The Federal Consent Decree (Jessy Roy, et.al. Woodland, and reviewed the Monroe Detention Center’s v. County of Yolo, CV S-90-0393 DFL-JFM P (E.D. Cal. Policy and Procedures Manual. 1997) Consent Decree, Modified Aug. 18, 1997 (E.D. Cal. 11 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt 1997)) requires that each inmate housed at the facility has civil process, or by other authority an assigned bed and thereby limits the number of inmates of law; that can be housed to 455. This requires routine shuffling 4. For the confinement of persons of confinees to keep them separated as required, and early sentenced to imprisonment therein release of individuals to meet the Consent Decree limits. upon a conviction for crime. There were 3,687 early releases in 2008. b. The above Penal Code section would apply only Despite the addition of 79 beds in the Monroe Center in to the first P & P “Establishment of the Facility 1996, and 142 beds when the Leinberger facility opened in and Description of its Mission.” The remaining 1991, the jail’s capacity has not kept pace with the significant 70 appear to be incorrectly referenced. growth in the population of the county, which has increased c. The applicable section of the California Penal from approximately 133,000 in 1988 to approximately Code is Title 4 – County Jails, Farms and Camps. 199,000 in 2008. The shortage of confinement space has Sections 4000 through 4030 are included in been exacerbated by the Federal Consent Decree, inmate Chapter 1 – County Jails, and cover a variety segregation requirements, and increased jail bookings. of topics concerning county jails. Bookings have increased 29% since 2000 to 10,187 in 3. Forty P & Ps incorrectly list “California 2008. Administrative Code, Title 15” as the reference. The correct nomenclature for this reference is policy and procedures Manual “California Code of Regulations, Title 15.” The An in-depth analysis of the manual revealed that: following Title 15 breakdown applies: 1. Of the 137 P & Ps in the manual: California Code of Regulations a. Only one has an audit date in 2007. Title 15. Crime Prevention and Corrections b. Nine have audit dates in 2006. Division 1. Board of Corrections c. Seven have audit dates in 2005. Chapter 1. Board of Corrections d. There is no indication that the remaining 120 Subchapter 4. Minimum Standards for P & Ps have ever been audited. (Note: The Local Detention Facilities Detention Commander has indicated that all P & Ps are reviewed at least annually, but no Articles 1-15 provide specific require- record of these reviews and/or audits was kept. ments for most facets of confinement. He said that problem is being corrected by the 4. Spot-checks of specific references (reviewing jail.) only California Penal Code & California Code of e. There are 113 P & Ps that have an effective/ Regulations, Title 15 references) in random P & revision date of 2003 or earlier. One (S.O. No. Ps were conducted. The results are contained in S-400) has no effective date at all. Append ix B. 2. Seventy-one P & Ps reference California Penal Code, section 4000. In 56 of these, California Penal FindinGS Code, section 4000 is the only reference cited. Jail visit a. Section 4000 provides only for the establishments

Seventy-one P & Ps reference California Penal Code, section 4000. In 56 of these, California Penal FindinGS Code, section 4000 is the only reference cited. Jail visit a. Section 4000 provides only for the establishments F-1 Areas visited by the grand jury were found to be of county jails and who they confine as clean and well maintained. delineated below:

Forty P & Ps incorrectly list “California

A majority (82.5%) of policies and procedures are Procedures are kept current, and reflect the latest changes greater than five years old. There is a very high to governing statutes and regulations. likelihood that policies, procedures, references or In most cases, outdated instructions do not normally other factors have changed during that period, and affect the day-to-day routine. Changes, when required, are have not been updated in the P & Ps. passed-down by word of mouth, memorandum, training, or pass-down logs, and the normal routine goes on smoothly.

Numerous policies and procedures incorrectly When a significant or serious event occurs (i.e. illness, riot, reference Title 15 as part of California escape, death, etc.), and an investigation ensues, it will be Administrative Code rather than California Code recognized that the Policy and Procedure instructions have of Regulations. not been updated, and therefore were not being followed.

A significant percentage of the P & Ps spot-checked The potential liability can be disastrous and costly. reference incorr ect and/or inappropriate sections of In-depth review of specific P & Ps requires knowledge governing regulations. of jail operations beyond the level of the investigating grand jury committee. However, analysis of the Policy and Procedures Manual governing instruction during this ReCoMMendAtionS study revealed it has not been complied with. This could 09-03 Make jail expansion a top priority in the county’s indicate non-compliance issues with other P & Ps. budget. The Grand Jury thanks the Monroe Detention Center 09-04 Review and audit policies and procedures at least staff for their conscientious cooperation during this study, annually as required by S.O. No. A-600. and for the changes already initiated to correct these problems. 09-05 Determine the correct references for policies and procedures that currently reference California Penal Code, Section 4000 (approximately 70). Where ReQueSt FoR ReSponSeS possible, California Code of Regulations, Title 15 Pursuant to California Penal Code, sections 933(c) should be the primary reference. and 933.05, the Yolo County Grand Jury request responses as follows: 09-06 Verify references for all remaining policies and procedures to ensure the manual (and therefore From the following individuals: the facility) comply with governing statutes and • Detention Commander, Monroe Detention Center corrections standards. Where possible, California (Findings F-3 through F6; Recommendations 09-04 Code of Regulations, Title 15 should be the primary through 09-06) reference. • Yolo County Sheriff (Recommendation 09-07) 09-07 Track completion of the above recommendations From the following governing body: and initiate procedures to ensure the Policy and Procedure Manual is being reviewed and audited • Yolo County Board of Supervisors (Finding F-2; as required. Recommendation 09-03) CoMMentS Jail overcrowding AppendiCeS: It is the opinion of the Grand Jury that Yolo County Appendix A: Monroe detention Center policy continues to place jail staff and confinees at risk by and procedures Manual Study spreadsheet not taking appropriate and urgent action to expand the and capacity of the facility. Despite conscientious, organized and determined efforts by the staff to meet segregation Appendix B: Results of Random Spot Checks of and consent decree requirements, a serious incident is References in individual p&ps likely to occur. continued on following pages policy and procedures Manual The Grand Jury cannot emphasize enough the importance of ensuring that published Policies and 13 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt AppendiCeS Monroe detention Center Appendix A: Monroe detention Center policy and procedures Manual Study spreadsheet Appendix A: Monroe Detention Center Policy and Procedures Manual Study spreadsheet continued on next page tiduA noisiveR evitceffE .O.S )s(ecnerefeR etaD etaD etaD roloC eltiT ON :tnemeganaM dna noitazinagrO ,noitartsinimdA – A noitceS 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW noissiM sti fo noitpircseD dna ytilicaF eht fo tnemhsilbatsE 001-A 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW noitceleS rof airetirC dna evitucexE feihC sa rednammoC noitneteD eht fo tnemhsilbatsE 051-A enoN 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW seicnegA rehtO fo seeyolpmE dna ,seeyolpmE tcartnoC ,stnatlusnoC fo seloR 002-A enoN 30/1/7 20/1/7 wolleY trahC lanoitazinagrO 003-A enoN 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW ffirehS eht dna ,sdaeH tinU dna noitceS ,ffatS tnemeganaM gnomA snoitacinummoC 004-A 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/3/7 20/1/7 etihW stnemucoD dna slaunaM tinU dna noitceS fo ecnanetniaM dna tnemhsilbatsE 005-A 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/3/7 20/1/7 etihW launaM erudecorP dna yciloP seitilicaF noitneteD a fo tnemhsilbatsE 006-A 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/1/7 20/1/7 wolleY seicnegA rehtO dna ,aideM cilbuP htiw pihsnoitaleR 007-A 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW snoitutitsnI lanoitacudE dna seicnegA ytinummoC htiw noitarepooC 057-A 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/1/7 20/1/7 wolleY ffatS rof ecnatsissA lageL 008-A 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW weiveR dna gnitropeR gnimmargorP ytilicaF rof yciloP tnemtrapeD 058-A :lennosreP – B noitceS enoN 30/1/7 20/1/7 deR scihtE fo edoC noitneteD 001-B enoN 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW stnemeriuqeR ffatS fo weiveR ralugeR 002-B UOM-AOCCY 70/02/21 60/02/21 20/1/7 deR yciloP ytuD ybdnatS 003-B IIIX trA ,UOM-AOCCY 50/51/01 40/51/01 99/71/9 deR yciloP noitacaV 004-B enoN 60/1/8 50/1/8 deR eciveD scinortcelE lanosreP fo esU 054-B enoN 60/1/8 50/1/8 50/1/8 deR sedarT tfihS 574-B enoN 60/1/8 50/1/8 50/1/8 deR syaD trohS 005-B :sredrO tsoP – C noitceS 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0081-0060( recfifO lanoitcerroC ekatnI/gnikooB 001-C enoN 60/4/4 50/4/4 deR recfifO noitacfiissalC tfihS yaD snoitagitsevnI dna ytiruceS 521-C enoN 60/4/4 50/4/4 deR recfifO noitpeceR tfihS yaD snoitagitsevnI dna ytiruceS 051-C enoN 60/4/4 50/4/4 deR recfifO trocsE dna hcraeS tfihS yaD snoitagitsevnI dna ytiruceS 571-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0060-0081( recfifO lanoitcerroC ekatnI/gnikooB 002-C enoN 60/4/4 50/4/4 deR recfifO noitacfiissalC tfihS thgiN snoitagitsevnI dna ytiruceS 522-C enoN 60/4/4 50/4/4 deR recfifO noitpeceR tfihS thgiN snoitagitsevnI dna ytiruceS 052-C enoN 60/4/4 50/4/4 deR recfifO trocsE dna hcraeS tfihS thgiN snoitagitsevnI dna ytiruceS 572-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0081-0060( revoR recfifO lanoitcerroC 003-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0060-0081( revoR recfifO lanoitcerroC 004-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0081-0060( recfifO retneC lortnoC lartneC 005-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0060--0081( recfifO retneC lortnoC lartneC 006-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0081-0060( recfifO tinU gnisuoH 2-B dna 1-B ,1-A 007-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0060-0081( recfifO tinU gnisuoH 2-B dna 1-B ,1-A 008-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0081-0060( recfifO tinU gnisuoH 2-A 009-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/4/9 09/91/2 deR )0060-0081( recfifO tinU gnisuoH 2-A 0001-C 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/21/8 30/51/4 deR tinU eninaC - sredrO tsoP 0011-C :tnempoleveD ffatS dna gniniarT – D noitceS 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/13/5 20/1/7 etihW tnemtrapeD gniniarT noitneteD eht fo noitanidrooC dna tnemhsilbatsE 001-D 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/3/6 20/1/7 etihW seeyolpmE fo spuorG tnereffiD rof airetirC gniniarT muminiM 002-D enoN 50/1/01 40/1/01 deR gniniarT ffatS ylkeeW 052-D :hcraeseR dna noitamrofnI tnemeganaM – E noitceS enoN 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW smetsyS noitamrofnI tnemeganaM 001-E :sdroceR – F noitceS 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/71/7 20/1/7 etihW tnemeganaM sdroceR esaC 001-F rof sdradnatS ;0004 ceS edoC laneP ,9905-2 sceS ,seitilicaF lacoL tludA 20/81/7 20/1/7 etihW goL tfihS yliaD dna ”tsiL ahplA“ etamn I 002-F 4015-2 ,1015-2 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/82/8 20/1/7 etihW stnemeriuqeR noitatupmoC ecnetneS 003-F )AND( ”suoremun“ 50/3/11 40/3/11 deR noitcelloC elpmaS AND 004-F 14 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt Monroe detention Center Appendix A: Monroe detention Center policy and procedures Manual Study spreadsheet continued from previous page tiduA noisiveR evitceffE .O.S )s(ecnerefeR etaD etaD etaD roloC eltiT ON :tnalP lacisyhP – G noitceS 001-G ainrofilaC ;0004 ceS edoC laneP 20/91/7 09/1/2 etihW saerA ecivreS seitilicaF rof stnemeriuqeR 42 & 51 eltiT ,edoC evitartsinimdA 002-G ainrofilaC ;0004 ceS edoC laneP 20/32/7 09/1/2 etihW margorP ecnanetniaM evitneverP 42 & 51 eltiT ,edoC evitartsinimdA :serudecorP ytefaS dna ycnegremE – H noitceS ,51 eltiT ,snoitalugeR fo edoC .filaC 60/1/6 50/1/6 wolleY snoitcepsnI ytefaS efiL dna eriF 05-H c(0306 ceS edoC laneP ;8201 ceS 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/03/8 09/02/2 deR noitaucavE ycnegremE 001-H 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/91/6 20/1/7 deR tnempiuqE dna serudecorP ycnegremE dna eriF 002-H 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/91/6 20/1/7 deR serudecorP ycnegremE dna eriF gnirotinoM 003-H 004-H ainrofilaC ;0004 ceS edoC laneP sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC evitartsinimdA 20/6/9 09/1/2 deR slairetaM citsuaC dna cixoT ,elbammalF fo esU dn a lortnoC 2301 ,8201 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/6/9 09/1/2 deR snalP ycnegremE ytilicaF 005-H 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/01/7 deR secnabrutsiD liviC 055-H 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/71/7 deR retsasiD larutaN 006-H :lortnoC dna ytiruceS – I noitceS 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/32/7 09/1/2 deR serudecorP dna selpicnirP tnuoC 001-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/62/7 09/1/2 wolleY selciheV lanosreP dna laicfifO fo esU 002-I ,51 eltiT,edoC evitartsinimdA ainrofilaC 20/61/8 99/1/01 deR riahC tniartseR 003-I )I( 513 # dradnatS QMI ;8501 ceS enoN 50/32/11 40/32/11 deR metsyS mralA regrebnieL 053-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/91/7 20/1/7 deR ytiruceS retemireP 004-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/32/7 09/1/2 deR sgoL tnenamreP fo esU dna noitcepsnI ytilicaF 054-I ,51 eltiT ,snoitalugeR fo edoC .filaC 60/1/6 50/1/6 wolleY stropeR ytilicaF noitneteD 574-I 4401 ceS 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/32/7 09/1/2 deR tnemevoM etamnI 005-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/32/7 09/1/2 deR setamnI fo noitatropsnarT 055-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/5/8 10/51/6 deR sessaP ytiruceS redivorP margorP dna eeyolpmE 006-I 0304 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 50/1/21 40/1/21 09/1/2 deR snoitacoL suoiraV dna setamnI fo hcraeS 056-I enoN 50/1/21 40/1/21 deR ytilicaF fo hcraeS 576-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/82/8 20/1/7 deR dnabartnoC 007-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/62/7 09/1/2 deR slairetaM suodrazaH dna tnempiuqE ,looT fo lortnoC 057-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/82/8 09/1/2 wolleY sretneC lortnoC lartneC 008-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/62/7 09/1/2 deR smraeriF fo lortnoC 058-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/92/7 09/1/2 deR ecroF fo esU 009-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/41/01 deR yciloP resaT 529-I 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/42/7 09/1/2 deR lortnoC yeK 059-I :setamnI tnemeganaM laicepS – J noitceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC evitartsinimdA .filaC 20/7/6 20/1/2 deR noitagergeS evitartsinimdA/ydotsuC evitcetorP 001-J 8501-0501 ceS 002-J ,51 eltiT ,edoC evitartsinimdA .filaC 20/7/6 20/1/2 deR noitagergeS yranilpicsiD 8501-0501 ceS sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC ;3121 ,6501 20/32/8 20/1/7 deR lleC gnireboS 003-J ,42 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC ;0306 303# dradnatS QMI ;43.2.A074-2 ceS :ecivreS dooF – K noitceS .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC -1321 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA 20/21/6 09/1/2 etihW setamnI rof teiD eht fo ycauqedA lanoitirtuN 001-K )2421-( 9421 .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC -1321 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA 20/21/6 09/1/2 etihW ecivreS laeM dna gninnalP uneM 002-K )2421-( 9421 .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/21/6 09/1/2 etihW secivreS dooF rof noitatinaS dna ytefaS 003-K 9421-1321 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA Appendix A: Monroe Detention Center Policy and Procedures Manual Study spreadsheet continued on next 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt tiduA noisiveR evitceffE .O.S )s(ecnerefeR etaD etaD etaD roloC eltiT ON :eneigyH dna noitatinaS – L noitceS ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/2/7 09/1/2 wolleY serudecorP lortnoC noitcefnI dna secitcarP noitatinaS fo noitcepsnI ,gnipeekesuoH 001-L 0821 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/8/7 09/1/2 wolleY lortnoC tseP dna lasopsiD etsaW 002-L .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/8/7 09/1/2 wolleY seilppuS neniL dna gniddeB ,gnihtolC etamnI 003-L 0821 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/8/7 09/1/2 wolleY setamnI rof seitilicaF eraC riaH dna gnihtaB 004-L 0821 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC :secivreS eraC htlaeH dna lacideM – M noitceS .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC QMI ;0021 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA 20/02/ 7 09/1/2 etihW seitilicaF lacideM fo rotartsinimdA 001-M 101 noitceS .nimdA ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC dna 0321-221 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW tnempiuqE dna seitilicaF lacideM 002-M tludA rof sdradnatS noitatiderccA seitilicaF noitneteD sdradnatS muminiM eht ot senilediuG ,1 eltiT ,seitilicaF noitneteD lacoL rof 20/03/8 wolleY slocotorP esaesiD elbacinummoC 003-M ,dradnatS serudecorP dna margorP 1501 ceS ,5 elcitrA ,2501 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 30/1/7 20/1/7 deR nalP ediciuS dna secivreS htlaeH latneM 004-M 113# dradnatS QMI ;0121-5021 ,0021 123# dradnatS QMI 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW secivreS latneD 005-M sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 20/03/8 wolleY deredrosiD yllatneM/delbasiD yllatnempoleveD 006-M 2501 ,9021 ,8021 ,7501 ,51 eltiT ,edoC evitartsinimdA .filaC 20/03/8 deR noitneverP ediciuS 007-M 9121 ceS ;4121 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 30/1/7 20/1/7 etihW tnesnoC demrofnI 057-M 206# dradnatS QMI ,51 eltiT ,snoitalugeR fo edoC .filaC 20/03/8 deR htaeD etamnI 008-M 8121 ceS 009-M .filaC ;0004 ceS edoC laneP ;0021 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC evitartsinimdA 20/02/7 09/1/2 wolleY sdroceR htlaeH lacideM 009-M sfer lacidem + ;1121 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 30/1/7 20/1/7 wolleY llaC kciS 0001-M 603# dradnatS QMI 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/7/11 etihW metsyS yrassimmoC ytilicaF eht hguorhT desahcruP smetI lacideM 0011-M :noitatneirO dna noitpeceR – N noitceS 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/82/8 20/1/7 deR serudecorP noissimdA etamnI 001-N 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/1/01 deR eciveD .S.A.P VI rosneS-OCLA 051-N 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/91/6 20/1/7 deR noitatneirO etamnI 002-N 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/91/6 20/1/7 deR ytreporP lanosreP etamnI 003-N 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/2/21 deR ytreporP ssecxE etamnI 004-N :noitacfiissalC – O noitceS sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC sceS ,edoC laneP .filaC ;8501-0501 20/82/8 09/1/2 deR noitacfiissalC laitin I 001-O 2004 ,1004 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC sceS ,edoC laneP .filaC ;8501-0501 20/8/8 09/2/2 deR etamnI sdeeN laicepS 002-O 2004 ,1004 ,0004 enoN 50/1/01 40/1/11 deR tsiL lleC elgniS 003-O :smargorP kroW etamnI – P noitceS sdradnatS ,0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC ,seitilicaF noitneteD lacoL tludA rof 20/02/8 10/92/1 wolleY tnemyolpmE etamnI 001-P ,3635-2 ,1635-2 - 9535-2 ,7535-2 sceS 5635-2 ;3.9104 ,0004 sceS ,edoC laneP .filaC noitneteD lacoL tludA rof sdradnatS 20/02/8 10/92/1 wolleY yaP etamnI 002-P 4635-2 ceS ,seitilicaF ,610.3021 sceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/81/6 10/92/1 wolleY ecnallievruS cinortcelE 003-P 9104 ,5.8021 ,2.8021 Monroe detention Center Appendix A: Monroe detention Center policy and procedures Manual Study spreadsheet continued from previous page Appendix A: Monroe Detention Center Policy and Procedures Manual Study spreadsheet continued on next 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt Monroe detention Center Appendix A: Monroe detention Center policy and procedures Manual Study spreadsheet continued from previous page tiduA noisiveR evitceffE .O.S )s(ecnerefeR etaD etaD etaD roloC eltiT ON ,2.8021 ,8021 sceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/02/8 10/92/1 wolleY hguolruF kroW 004-P 9104 ,5.8021 ,3.8021 2.4204 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/02/8 10/92/1 wolleY ).P.I.W.S( margorP etamnI gnikroW s'ffirehS 005-P :noitacudE lanoitacoV dna cimedacA – Q noitceS ;1601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 20/2/6 09/1/2 etihW gninnalP margorP 001-Q 5204 ,0004 sceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 1601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC evitartsinimdA .filaC 20/91/6 09/1/2 etihW mulucirruC margorP lanoitacoV dna lanoitacudE 002-Q 1601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC evitartsinimdA .filaC 20/91/6 09/1/2 etihW secitcarP lennosreP lanoitacudE 003-Q ;1601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 20/91/6 99/1/2 etihW noitaulavE margorP lanoitacudE 004-Q 5204 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC :sthgiR etamnI – R noitceS 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/42/6 20/1/7 wolleY setamnI fo sthgiR citammargorP dna latnemnorivnE 001-R 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/03/6 20/1/7 deR setamnI elameF fo sthgiR 002-R 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/03/6 20/1/7 wolleY gnimmargorP lanoitarepO 003-R 3701 ceS ,51 eltiT ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/9/7 20/1/7 deR erudecorP ecnaveirG etamnI 004-R 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/32/7 20/1/7 wolleY aideM weN eht ot sseccA etamnI rof yciloP ytilicaF 005-R 5401 ceS ,51 eltiT ,snoitalugeR fo edoC .filaC 60/1/6 50/1/6 wolleY nalP noitamrofnI cilbuP 055-R :enilpicsiD dna seluR etamnI – S noitceS .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC ;4801-0801 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA 20/03/5 09/1/2 deR snoitcA hcuS rof seitlaneP dna setamnI rof detibihorP stcA 001-S noitneteD lacoL tludA rof sdradnatS 3135-2 ,8035-2 - 5035-2 sceS ,seitilicaF .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/03/5 09/2/2 deR snoitaloiV seluR rof serudecorP gnitropeR 002-S 4801-0801 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC ;4801-0801 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA 20/13/5 98/6/9 deR noitarepO sti rof seluR cisaB dna eettimmoC yranilpicsiD 003-S noitneteD lacoL tludA rof sdradnatS 5235-2 ,8135-2 ,4135-2 ,1135-2 sceS ,seitilicaF enoN deR liaJ eht ni ytivitcA lanimirC 004-S :secivreS etamnI – T noitceS ,51 eltiT ,snoitalugeR fo edoC .filaC 20/11/1 79/62/2 deR yciloP gnildnaH liaM 001-T 6601 ,3601 sceS ;7601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 20/41/6 20/1/2 deR senohpeleT ot sseccA etamnI 002-T 5.158 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC ;2601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 20/13/5 99/1/01 deR gnitisiV etamnI 003-T 1754 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 1701 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 20/11/4 99/1/01 wolleY gnitoV 004-T .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/82/6 09/2/2 wolleY ecivreS yrarbiL waL 005-T 4601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA 4601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,snoitalugeR fo edoC .filaC 20/82/6 09/2/2 wolleY secivreS yrarbiL 006-T :ytivitcA etamnI dna noitaerceR – U noitceS .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/01/7 09/1/2 etihW gninnalP margorP 001-U 5601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC ;0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC .filaC ;5601 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA 20/2/7 09/1/2 etihW lennosreP noitaerceR 002-U 6005 ,5204 sceS ,edoC laneP :secivreS suoigileR – V noitceS .filaC ;5204 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/5/8 10/51/6 etihW serudecorP margorP 001-V 2701 ceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/5/8 10/51/6 etihW rotanidrooC smargorP etamnI 002-V :smargorP secivreS laicoS – W noitceS ,1601 ,2501 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC 20/61/8 10/51/6 etihW smargorP fo sepyT 001-W 9121 ,0121 ,9021 ,5.7021 ,5021 ,0701 ,4601 ,2501 sceS ,51 eltiT ,edoC .nimdA .filaC ,9021 ,5.7021 ,5021 ,0701 ,4601 ,1601 0/81/6 10/51/6 etihW lennosreP ecivreS laicoS 002-W 5204 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC ;9121 ,0121 :setamnI fo esaeleR – X noitceS 6.8104 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/03/8 09/1/2 deR serudecorP esaeleR yraropmeT etamnI 001-X 0004 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 20/92/8 09/1/1 deR serudecorP esaeleR ydotsuC etamnI 002-X 6.358 ceS ,edoC laneP .filaC 30/1/6 deR tserrA ronaemedsiM esaeleR-noN rof nosaeR 003-X eerceD tnesnoC laredeF 50/3/6 50/52/5 deR serudecorP esaeleR eerceD tnesnoC 004-X 17 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt Monroe detention Center Appendix B: Results of Random Spot Checks of References in individual p & ps . Results of Random Spot Checks of References in Individual P & Ps. a. Fire and Life Safety Inspections (S.O. No H-50) references California Code of Regulations, Title 15, Sections 1028, and California Penal Code, section 6030(c). • California Code of Regulations, section 1028 is correct. • California Penal Code, section 6030(c) is the governing statute that directs CSA (Corrections Standards Authority) to establish minimum standards for correctional facilities. Its use as a reference in this document is inappropriate. b. Control and Use of Flammable, Toxic and Caustic Materials (S.O. No. H-400) references California Administrative Code, Title 15, sections 1028 and 1032. • These sections concern “Fire and Life Safety Staff” and “Fire Suppression Preplanning”, not the P & Ps subject. • California Administrative Code is incorrect as noted on , #3 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). c. Restraint Chair (S.O. No. I-300) references California Administrative Code, Title 15, section 1058. • Section 1058 of Title 15 is the correct reference. • California Administrative Code is incorrect as noted on , #3 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). d. Detention Facility Reports (S.O. No. I-475) correctly references California Code of Regulations, Title 15, Section 1044. e. Protective Custody/Administrative Segregation (S.O. No. J-100) references California Administrative Code, Title 15, sections 1050 through 1058. • Only sections 1050 and 1053 apply to this P & P in accordance with the following breakdown of Title 15, Article 5 – Classification and Segregation: 1050 – Classification Plan 1051 – Communicable Diseases 1052 – Mentally Disordered Inmates 1053 – Administrative Segregation 1054 – Administrative Removal – Type IV Facility 1055 – Use of Safety Cell 1056 – Use of Sobering Cell 1057 – Developmentally Disabled Inmates 1058 – Use of Restrain Devices • California Administrative Code is incorrect as noted on , #3 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). f. Disciplinary Segregation (S.O. No. J-200) references California Administrative Code, Title 15, sections 1050 through 1058. • These sections are incorrect. Disciplinary segregation is covered in sections 1080 through 1084 of Title 15. • California Administrative Code is incorrect as noted on , #3 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). g. Sobering Cell (S.O. No. J-300) references California Administrative Code, Title 15, sections 1056 and 1213, and California Penal Code, section 6030(c). • Sections 1056 and 1213 of Title 15 are the correct references. • California Penal Code, section 6030(c) is the governing statute that directs CSA (Corrections Standards Authority) to establish minimum standards for correctional facilities. Its use as a reference in this document is inappropriate. • California Administrative Code is incorrect as noted on , #3 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). h. Nutritional Adequacy of Diet for Inmates (S.O. No. K-100) and Menu Planning and Meal Service (S.O. No. K-200) reference California Administrative Code, Title 15, sections 1231 through 1249 (except section 1242), and California Penal Code, section 4000. • Sections 1231 through 1239 are not contained in Title 15. • Food service procedures are covered in Title 15, sections 1240 through 1249, plus section 1230 – Food Handlers. • California Administrative Code is incorrect as noted on , #3 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). • California Penal Code, section 4000 is incorrect as noted on , #2 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). i. Housekeeping, Inspection of Sanitation Practices and Infection Control Procedures (S.O. No. L-100) references California Administrative Code, Title 15, section 1280, and California Penal Code, section 4000. • Section 1280 of Title 15 is the correct reference. • California Administrative Code is incorrect as noted on , #3 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). • California Penal Code, section 4000 is incorrect as noted on , #2 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). j. Program Planning (S.O. No. Q-100) references California Administrative Code, Title 15, section 1061, and California Penal Code, sections 4000 and 4025. • Section 1061 of Title 15 is the correct reference. • California Administrative Code is incorrect as noted on , #3 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). • California Penal Code, section 4000 is incorrect as noted on , #2 (in the Policies and Procedures Manual section). • California Penal Code, section 4025 concerns the requirement for maintaining and operating a store, not Program Planning. 18 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt dunnigan Fire protection district A review of the 247 calls in 2008 revealed that 50 did not require service (e.g., false alarms, authorized burns, SuMMARY no incident found, etc.). Of the remaining 197 calls, 51% Members of the Grand Jury visited the Dunnigan Fire involved emergency medical services as follows: Protection District (DFPD) in October 2008. The mostly- • EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury = volunteer district appears to be well-equipped. About one- 81 half of their calls (after eliminating false alarms) involved • Vehicle accident with injuries = 15 emergency medical services, a situation suggesting the • Rescue and EMS incident, other = 3 importance of emergency medical training certification on • Rescue and EMS standby = 1 the part of the volunteers. There were 63 responses recorded for August through October 2008. The average response time was nine ReASon FoR viSit minutes. California Penal Code Section 925 authorizes the FindinGS Grand Jury to investigate and report upon the operations of any special district within the county. Pursuant to the F-1 DFPD appears to be well-equipped and adequately statute, on October 28, 2008, the Grand Jury conducted staffed. an oversight tour of the DFPD station at 29145 Main St, F-2 DFPD has a 20-year plan that should accommodate Dunnigan, CA 95937. needed expansion. ACtionS tAKen F-3 A substantial number (51%) of the calls during a three-month period of 2008 involved a potential • Interviewed Fire Chief and a member of the DFPD need for emergency medical treatment. governing board • Toured the fire station and community room ReCoMMendAtionS • Reviewed response times for months of August 09-08 DFPD continue to maintain adequate staffing and through October, 2008 equipment. • Reviewed number of calls from January 1 through October 31, 2008 09-09 DFPD governing commission should pursue its • Reviewed the current and projected budget 20-year plan. • Reviewed the DFPD 20-year plan 09-10 Given the number of calls involving a need for emergency medical treatment, all firefighters should WHAt tHe JuRY deteRMined receive EMT certification. DFPD provides fire and emergency medical services to 1,369 community residents throughout a 112 square ReQueSt FoR ReSponSe mile area, the second largest response area of all Yolo Pursuant to California Penal Code, sections 933(c) and County fire districts. It is equipped with two engines, one 933.05, the Yolo County Grand Jury requests a response water tender, one grass truck, one brush truck, and one as follows: squad truck. DFPD is staffed by 17 volunteers, plus one paid From the following governing body: employee and four cadets. The Fire Chief receives a stipend • Dunnigan Fire District Board of Commissioners of $400 per month. The fire station is staffed Monday, (Findings F1 through F3; Recommendations 09-08 through Friday, eight hours a day with one paid staff and through 09-10) one to three of the four cadets. When a call is received, the volunteers respond to a pager and cell-phone texting system. The first two firefighters to arrive at the station Juvenile detention Facility respond to the call. The firefighters receive training in public safety, first SuMMARY aid, and CPR. They are encouraged to obtain Emergency The Yolo County Grand Jury conducted a briefing Medical Technician (EMT) certification. They periodically and facility tour, as well as two additional fact finding receive special training including mandated training meetings at the Juvenile Detention Facility (JDF). The in automobile extrication, structure and wildland fire Grand Jury found the JDF to be a well-operated facility, suppression. Of the 18 staff, six have received EMT providing a variety of programs that benefit resident certification; all four cadets are EMT certified. juveniles, their families, and the citizens of Yolo County. 19 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt Federal and state grants, in addition to bed rental The highest priority is the security and safety of contracts, have reduced Yolo County’s contribution to juveniles and staff. An additional goal of the JDF is to the JDF budget by 18%. operate as nearly like a home as possible with both care and discipline. ReASon FoR viSit Construction of the new JDF was completed in 2005 California Penal Code, section 925 authorizes the and consists of three housing pods and support facilities. Grand Jury to investigate and report on the operations, Each pod has a 30-bed capacity, two classrooms, space accounts, and records of the officers, departments or for basic medical assessments, and an activity area. functions of the County. Pursuant to that statute, the There is no “all-weather” (i.e., sheltered) exercise or Grand Jury visited the Juvenile Detention Facility (JDF) recreational area. On the day of the Grand Jury’s visit at 2880 East Gibson Road in Woodland. (February 7), there were 74 juveniles in residence. The Juvenile Detention 2008-2009 recommended GloSSARY annual budget is 5.6 million dollars. Of that amount, The Yolo County Construction Program (YCCP) is approximately 1 million dollars is provided from Yolo a collaborative prog ram led by the Probation Depart- County. Fees and charges totaling approximately 3.2 ment and includes participation or support from the million dollars are generated by bed rental contracts (bed Department of Employment and Social Services, rentals refer to space made available for juveniles from Department of Alcohol, Drug and Mental Health, the agencies other than Yolo County). The JDF has contracts Yolo County Office of Education (YCOE), and Northern with the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services California Construction and Training. Office of Refugee Resettlement and neighboring Evidenced Based Programs (EBP) are programs California counties, including Sacramento, Tuolumne, that have been scientifically validated and proven to be Mariposa, and Amador. The remaining 1.4 million reliable in reducing recidivism, enhancing public safety dollars is provided from Public Safety Sales Taxes and and reducing the costs of incarceration and out of home federal/state reimbursements. Due to budget constraints, placements (Appendix A). there are eight JDF staff positions unfilled at this time. YCCP is a component of the JDF’s rehabilitative ACtionS tAKen program. Up to 20 moderate and high risk juveniles On February 7, 2009, members of the Grand Jury met at the JDF may enter the YCCP each semester. After a with the Chief Probation Officer, the Superintendent, and detailed assessment of each juvenile, the YCCP uses Assistant Superintendent of the JDF. Jurors were given a EBP (Appendix A) and other programs to counsel and comprehensive tour of the facility, which included: educate juveniles regarding alcohol, drug use, and • Visiting the booking and holding areas, medical aggression management. Crisis support is provided as suite, control room, and co-ed housing pod, includ- needed. ing classrooms and recreational areas. YCCP also provides individualized educational • Observing juveniles in open areas of the pod support. After testing to determine academic level, interacting with each other and staff. juveniles attend a 5-day per week educational program, Subsequent to the visit, members of the Grand Jury overseen by the YCOE and operated as the Dan Jacobs reviewed the JDF Policy and Procedures Manual, the School. Students receive individualized support to help Juvenile Detention 2008-2009 Budget, the Corrections achieve their educational goals, such as returning to Standards Authority Biennial Inspection Report and or graduating from high school, General Educational YCCP summary, goals, and recidivism statistics. Development (GED) testing, or attending junior college. Members of the Grand Jury conducted follow-up Since August 2007, 37 students at JDF have passed the visits with JDF staff on February 23 and April 9, 2009 GED. to verify data and obtain additional supporting infor- Vocational training is also provided through the mation. YCCP. Participants receive on-the-job training in a pre- apprenticeship program for construction trades and are WHAt tHe JuRY deteRMined paid minimum wage. The JDF is a division of the Probation Department. When a juvenile owes restitution to a victim, a Its mission is to protect the public from the delinquent Probation Officer works closely with him or her to acts of minors by providing for their safe and secure encourage payment of financial obligations. As the funds reception and temporary care, pursuant to provisions of come from the juvenile’s own earnings, it contributes to California Laws and Regulations. offender accountability. 20 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt Using a new case management system, the Juvenile in nature, they are very encouraging. Division researched the records of 13 YCCP participants The Grand Jury commends the CFMG and JDF who had graduated by June 2005. During the 18 months for their efforts in maintaining a higher than required following their graduation, 38% committed a known medical accreditation rating. offense. Subsequently, three new programs (EBP) were The Grand Jury encourages the JDF and the county added to the YCCP: Aggression Replacement Training to increase the level of dental care, and provide an all (also known as Teaching Pro Social Skills), Functional weather exercise and recreational facility when the fiscal Family Therapy, and Functional Family Probation. situation improves or grants become available. For the 23 graduates completing the enriched program (between January 2006 and June 2007) recidivism AppendiX dropped to 9%. A Program Coordinator ensures that resident Appendix A: County of Yolo probation juveniles are engaged in various programs (primarily department evidence Based programs and Yolo those listed in Appendix A) that enhance life skills, County Juvenile detention Facility programs provide mind-challenging activities, and encourage community involvement. Various groups and individuals volunteer to spend time with the juveniles to help educate, Appendix A: County of Yolo Probation Evidence Based Programs and give legal and other advice, or read and talk with them. Yolo County Detention Facility Programs continued on next two pages All volunteers are screened and trained before starting, and additional volunteers are always welcome. The California Forensic Medical Group (CFMG) contracts with the County to provide medical services for juveniles in custody. All juveniles are given a physical screening within 96 hours of their admittance to the JDF. A Registered Nurse staffs the JDF eight hours daily, seven days a week. A physician and Family Nurse Practitioner are available weekly. There are no dental services available other than for an emergency. Medical accreditation is reviewed every two years. CFMG at JDF is currently rated at a higher level than is required by regulation. According to the Probation Department, there are only ten other Juvenile Detention Facilities with medical accreditation in California. CoMMentS Management staff at the JDF made good choices in the planning and promotion of the construction of the new JDF. They looked to the future requirements of the County and considered housing juveniles from other counties and the federal government as a way to help fund future and current needs. Those choices have made possible the acquisition of out-of-county funds that contribute to Yolo County JDF operations and provide for long-term benefits and growth. Maximizing revenue from sources outside the County General Fund by using resources to apply for grants has also reduced costs to Yolo County, and helped to improve services and results at the JDF. These grants have made possible the outcomes indicated by the multi- year recidivism comparison study. Although the graduate numbers are small and the comparisons are preliminary 21 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt Juvenile detention Facility Appendix A: County of Yolo probation department evidence Based programs and Yolo County Juvenile detention Facility programs 22 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt Juvenile detention Facility Appendix A: County of Yolo probation department evidence Based programs and Yolo County Juvenile detention Facility programs 23 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt Yolo Wayfarer Center In 2008 the Walter’s House program served 177 individuals in the substance abuse treatment program. The treatment center depends largely on public funds, ReASon FoR viSit and currently has grants/contracts for all spaces. A contract Section 933.6 of the California Penal Code authorizes with the California Department of Corrections pays the the Grand Jury to investigate and report on any non-profit costs of referrals made by the Court. corporation operated on behalf of a public entity. Pursuant to that statute, members of the Yolo County Grand Jury emergency shelter visited Walter’s House (a residential drug treatment facility) The shelter provides 28 beds (equally divided between and the Yolo Wayfarer Center (which provides emergency men and women) and 22 additional spaces for families. food and shelter for those in need). The facilities are located Families sleep on mattresses in a general-purpose room, on Fourth Street in Woodland. which also serves as the dining room. Residents can shower, do laundry, and receive mail at the facility. The shelter ACtionS tAKen also provides each client with referrals and “life-plans” to Members of the Grand Jury conducted a walk-through assist in their transition out of shelter housing. tour of both facilities on October 23, 2008, hosted by Initially the emergency shelter, which opened in 2006, their respective directors. At Walter’s House, the tour provided up to 73 beds, but this capacity was reduced to included living accommodations, counseling rooms, 50 after the loss of $200,000 of federal money. In 2008, and administrative areas. The Yolo Wayfarer Center the emergency shelter served 393 individuals, 12% of tour included the dining and sleeping areas, as well as whom were children. administrative offices. A follow-up interview with the Executive Director was Family transitional housing conducted, and a copy of the 2008 Annual Report of the The Yolo Wayfarer Center manages 14 housing units Yolo Wayfarer Center was reviewed. throughout Woodland for indigent families, who can reside there for up to six months under strict guidelines. In 2008, 36 families, including 70 children and 43 adults, were WHAt tHe JuRY deteRMined provided shelter while they transitioned to employment The Yolo Wayfarer Center provides a wide array of and permanent residences. services for individuals and families with immediate and/or long-term needs. These services include a substance abuse daily meals treatment center, emergency shelter, family transitional The Yolo Wayfarer Center provides breakfast, lunch, housing, and daily meals. and a hot dinner. In 2008, community volunteers prepared In 2008, 736 individuals were provided assistance and served 23,210 evening dinners and a combined total through these programs at a cost of just under $10 per of 21,657 breakfasts and lunches. In support of this effort, person per day. The annual budget for Wayfarer Center community businesses contributed 238,025 pounds of food, programs in 2008 was $1,315,400. Of this amount, 45% thus reducing the Center’s cost to less than $2.00 per came from the state, 14% from federal grants, and 23% meal. Over 100 county residents volunteered at the Yolo from county and city revenues. Additionally, private Wayfarer Center. donations accounted for 17% of the total. oversight Substance abuse treatment center A Board of Directors, comprised of 13 community Walter’s House, named after Rev. Walter Zeck, the members, oversees the operation of the Yolo Wayfarer founder of the Yolo Wayfarer Center, was started in 2002. Center. At least one seat on the Board is reserved for a It is a major drug and alcohol abuse residential treatment representative of the faith community and two seats are program in Yolo County and provides 14 transitional beds reserved for formerly homeless individuals. The remaining and 30 beds for residential treatment. Transitional beds seats are filled with approval of the seated board members. are reserved for those residents who have successfully The Board meets once a month. completed the 3-month treatment program and are making the move to employment and residence outside the center. CoMMentS At least 53 individuals made the transition in 2008. The The Yolo Wayfarer Center is one of only three facility also serves individuals who are homeless, including emergency centers in the county. In West Sacramento, those who struggle with mental illness and substance abuse. Broderick has a day-use shelter, which provides food and 24 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt showers, and a place to receive mail. The Davis Community • Statistics on Academic Performance Index (API) Center can accommodate 12 overnight clients. and California High School Exit Exam (CaHSEE) The Yolo County Grand Jury commends the efforts of passage rates the dedicated individuals who staff the Wayfarer Center • Statistics on expulsions and suspensions and Walter’s House. Decreased funding and increased demand for their services have taxed their ingenuity to WHAt tHe JuRY deteRMined do more with less. According to the Interim Superintendent, the district The Walter’s House staff is concerned that demand has experienced a declining enrollment in eight of the for their program will increase while funding sources will last nine years totaling 16%, with a resulting loss in in- become more difficult to obtain as all levels of government come. The current student population is about 1,700. suffer significant revenue decreases. The Grand Jury Thus far the district has been able to maintain small encourages the County to continue funding this essential class size – a ratio of 27 to 1 in grades 4 through 12, and service to our community. a ratio of 20 to 1 in grades K through 3. The average class size is 25. A review of the budget showed that since 2002-2003, the District has made annual reductions in expenditures Winters Joint Unified School (e.g., eliminating positions, setting aside funds). They district have certified to the County that they are able to meet current year and next two budgetary year obligations. With regard to academic performance, the high SuMMARY school exit exam (CaHSEE) is given in the 10th grade. Despite a declining enrollment, the Winters Joint District passage rates in language and math are 80%. Unified School District administration has been able to The passage rate is 99% by end of 12th grade. maintain classroom size and services. High school grad- In the 2007-2008 school year there were two expul- uation examination passage rate is over 80% in the 10th sions from Winters High School: 1) possession of a con- grade, and 99% by the end of 12th grade. There were trolled substance and a weapon; 2) use of threat, force, only four expulsions in the last academic year. and possession of a weapon. There were two expulsions The district, in collaboration with the city and coun- from Wolfskill Continuation High School: 1) disruption, ty is building a new library next to the high school. The 2) obscenity and disruption. The total number of expul- library will be available to the entire community and be- sions (4) was down from the previous year’s district total come part of the Yolo County Library system. of 15. To solve the problem of inadequate library services ReASon FoR viSit for the high school and the community, the School Dis- Section 925 of the California Penal Code authorizes trict and County entered into a joint powers agreement the Grand Jury to investigate and report upon the to construct a library and community center. The facility operations of any agency or district within the county. will be located on the high school campus. The build- Pursuant to the statute, on December 17, 2008, the Grand ing is expected to be completed by August 2009. The Jury visited the Winters Joint Unified School District District’s contribution to the agreement is the land and office at 909 W. Grant Ave., Winters, CA 95694. $400,000 for construction. The majority of the construc- tion costs are borne by the County, which will own the ACtionS tAKen facility. The library will become a part of the Yolo Coun- Members of the Grand Jury met with the Interim ty Library system. Superintendent and the Chief Business Officer. They also reviewed the following documents: CoMMentS • General Fund Summary for the period ending The district appears to have made prudent fiscal de- Nov. 30, 2008 cisions in anticipation of decreasing revenues. • Graduation requirements The creation of a library community center by the • Suspension and expulsion/due process policy docu- School District, City, and County is a laudatory example ment of pooling resources to meet the needs of a multiple con- • School Accountability Report Card (required by stituency. the state) for Winters High School, 2006-7 25 2008–2009 Yolo CountY GRAnd JuRY FinAl RepoRt Yolo County Office of Education Early Head Start Program jointly with the County Board of Education; ReASon FoR viSit • has authority over YCOE personnel decisions; • offers professional development services to teach- Section 925 of the California Penal Code authorizes ers, administrators, staff, and county residents; and the Grand Jury to investigate and report on the operations • reviews the proposed budgets for each school dis- of any department which functions within the county. trict in the county on an annual basis. Pursuant to that statute, the 2008-2009 Yolo County Grand Jury visited the Yolo County Office of Education The Superintendent can make a Negative Declara- (YCOE) at 1280 Santa Anita Court, Suite 100, in Wood- tion on a district budget that appears to be in trouble. land. In such a circumstance, the YCOE offers assistance or a district may seek the assistance of budget experts from ACtionS tAKen the state. At the time of our visit, the YCOE administra- On September 30, 2008, members of the Grand Jury tors stated that no district in Yolo County was under a met with the Superintendent of Schools, the Associate Negative Declaration. Superintendent for Administrative Services, and the As- The 2008-2009 budget for the County Office of Ed- sociate Superintendent for Educational Services. A tour ucation is $32,865,217. Over 15 million dollars of that of YCOE facilities concluded the visit. amount (most of it from the state and federal govern- ments) goes to support special education programs and The Grand Jury sought to learn more about the facilities throughout the county. • authority and oversight roles of the County Office of The YCOE employs 216 full-time-equivalent per- Education and the County Board of Education; sonnel (including teachers and staff). Using Certificates • range of operations of the YCOE; of Participation, the YCOE purchased buildings in the • types of educational services offered; and northeastern section of Woodland. Completed in June • fiscal condition of the YCOE. 2005, the remodel provides office facilities and confer- ence rooms for small and large group meetings. WHAt tHe JuRY deteRMined In Yolo County, the County Superintendent and CoMMent CountyBoard of Education members are elected. State The Grand Jury found no reason for further investi- law largely defines the authority of each. Although they gation at the time of the visit. are separately elected, the Board has some authority sep- arate from that of the Superintendent, as shown below. The County Board • hears appeals of school district decisions on inter- district transfers and student expulsions; • authorizes changes in local school trustee residence boundaries; • sets policy for the Juvenile Detention Facility school, community alternative schools, and the Regional Occupational Program (ROP); • shares oversight of the Head Start Program with the County Superintendent; and • reviews and approves the budget for the YCOE, which is administered by the Superintendent. The YCOE, headed by the County Superintendent of Schools, • oversees the fiscal status of the five school districts within the county; • administers the schools and programs operated by the county (e.g., the Juvenile Detention Facility school, Midtown Community School, Einstein Edu- cation Center, and ROP). It oversees the Head Start/ 26 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report: appendiX reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report appendiX responses to the 2007-2008 Yolo County Grand Jury Final report 27 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report: appendiX reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 28 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report Woodland Joint Unified School District (WJuSd) 29 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 30 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 31 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 32 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 33 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 34 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 35 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 36 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 37 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 38 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 39 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 40 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 41 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 42 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 43 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 44 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 45 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 46 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 47 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 48 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 49 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 50 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 51 Response fRom DR. JACKI CoTTInGIm, foRmeR supeRInTenDenT wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 52 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 53 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 54 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 55 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 56 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 57 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 58 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 59 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 60 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 61 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 62 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 63 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 64 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 65 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 66 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 67 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 68 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 69 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 70 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 71 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 72 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 73 Response fRom wJusD boARD of TRusTees – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 74 Response fRom yolo CounTy DIsTRICT ATToRney Re: wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 75 Response fRom yolo CounTy DIsTRICT ATToRney Re: wJusD – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 76 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report davis Fire department 77 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 78 Response fRom DAvIs CITy CounCIl, DAvIs CITy mAnAGeR AnD DAvIs fIRe ChIef Re: DAvIs fIRe DepT. – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 79 Response fRom DAvIs CITy CounCIl, DAvIs CITy mAnAGeR AnD DAvIs fIRe ChIef Re: DAvIs fIRe DepT. – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 80 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report esparto Community Services district 81 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 82 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 83 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 84 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 85 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 86 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 87 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 88 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 89 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 90 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 91 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 92 Response fRom Ron loudon, geneRal manageR espaRto community seRvices distRict – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 93 Response fRom espaRto community seRvices distRict boaRd of diRectoRs – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 94 Response fRom espaRto community seRvices distRict boaRd of diRectoRs – 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report Yolo County office of emergency Services and Yolo County Branch libraries 95 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 96 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 97 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies – pg 1 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 98 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies – pg 2 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 99 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies – pg 3 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 100 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies – pg 4 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 101 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies – pg 5 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 102 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 103 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 104 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies – pg 1 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report appendiX: reSponSeS to tHe 2007-2008 Final report 105 Response fRom shaRon jensen, county administRatoR Re: yolo county oes and yolo county bRanch libRaRies – pg 2 2008–2009 Yolo CountY Grand JurY Final report 106