Score: +3
(3/2/0)
Orange County Grand Jury
• 2012-2013
NO Victims Foreword The 2012-2013 Grand Jury was sworn in on July 2, 2012. Within two weeks, the Grand Jury learned of
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
Municipalities in Orange County cities are well-versed in EEO issues and maintain exemplary compliance strategies.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
OC cities and the County of Orange government shall continue efforts to utilize best practices with respect to Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation. (F1,3)
F2
In an effort to improve Human Resource efficiencies and increase focus on EEO, the County has centralized its Human Resource functions in the new HRSD.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
All OC cities and County government shall include funding for training of management and supervision as required by law and ensure training for all employees every two to three years. (F2,3,4,5)
R4
The OC Board of Supervisors shall continue to provide funding and resources sufficient to complete HRSD’s centralization program. (F2)
F3
The County has implemented a Compliance Oversight Committee (COC) to review all EEO complaints in the County.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Complaint ratios between OC cities and the County of Orange are similar; but differences in how previous complaints were handled in the County led to major problems.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The County and several cities do not offer, or provide limited, training in harassment, discrimination, and retaliation, particularly for line staff. At this time, although line staff training is not required, all staff benefit from EEO training.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
There are several Risk Management Joint Powers Insurance Pools (of which most cities are members) to ensure adequate coverage and sharing of liability with other member entities.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
OC cities shall review SIR aggregate limits every five years to assess changes in risk management economies and insurance pool mix. (F6)
Agency Responses 28
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.