Score: +4
(25/76/21)
Contra Costa County Grand Jury
• 2022-2023
Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury Report 2306
Published: June 14, 2023
42 pages
⚠️ Aviso de traducción: Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 13 findings
F1
Within existing city or County infrastructure there is no clear owner who is responsible for achieving RHNA permitting targets.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan.
F2
City and County officials see no direct path to meet state-mandated regional housing (RHNA) targets.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
There are currently no measurable penalties if a city or a County does not achieve RHNA targets in an approved housing element plan.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Data published by ABAG shows that Contra Costa County and most of its cities have missed their current RHNA targets for very low- and low-income housing allocations. The allocation requirements continue to increase (16x for very low-income and 4x for low- income residents).
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
Each city and the County should report AH progress and lack of progress using data across all four measured income groups. Special attention should be paid to tracking the housing needs of residents categorized as very low- and low-income. Cities and the County should communicate their progress, biannually, against RHNA targets at council and supervisor meetings.
R5
Each city and the County should consider developing a public dashboard to report progress against RHNA targets.
F5
Many obstacles hinder the development of AH at the local level, specifically for very low- and low-income housing, including: a. Limited availability of land; b. Restrictive zoning policies specific to AH development; c. Limited developer interest to bring projects forward; d. Limited available funding; e. Lack of community support; f. NIMBY opposition & city council response to NIMBY opposition.
Related Recommendations (2)
R3
Each city and the County should consider creating a dedicated AH commission comprised of a multi-disciplinary team of diverse citizens and led by a current, nonelected, city expert in planning. Each commission would be charged with providing a community voice in the process and helping to identify and address obstacles that hinder the development of affordable housing projects in their community.
R4
Each city and the County should consider reviewing existing processes and identifying changes that would address or resolve the specific obstacles identified in this report that hinder achieving RHNA allocation targets for very low- and low-income housing in their community.
F6
Zoning changes are generally addressed only when a project is presented for development. Zoning obstacles include: a. Housing element plans that offer poor land choices for AH development; b. Restrictive height and high-density zoning policies; c. Lack of inclusionary housing ordinance(s) in many cities.
Related Recommendations (3)
R6
Each city and the County should consider, in their individual Housing Element plans, putting forth land zoned “suitable for residential use,” without development obstacles, and located strategically close to existing services, for AH purposes.
R7
Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider making zoning changes in light of that review that will support AH in their community.
R8
Cities should consider adopting an inclusionary housing ordinance as part of their standard development policy (if not already in place).
F7
Penalties directed at cities and the County (financial, loss of control over local planning) are tied to not meeting state deadlines for Housing Element plan approval
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Builder’s Remedy and SB35 projects do not address ingrained local obstacles identified in this report that prevent the completion of approved AH projects.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
When local Redevelopment Agencies (RDA’s) were discontinued by the state in 2012, the County and cities did not address the loss of funding for affordable housing or find alternative funding to support affordable housing projects until voters passed Measure X in November 2020. Projects that target very low- and low-income residents were particularly impacted.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Measure X housing funds are not fully dedicated to building AH for very low- and low- income residents.
Related Recommendations (2)
R9
Each city and the County should consider how to prioritize the implementation of housing projects that promote development of very low- and low-income housing.
R10
Each city and the County should consider prioritizing Measure X funding requests that support projects that address RHNA targets for very low- and low-income residents. Each city and County should consider reporting regularly to their residents on the use of Measure X funds for such purposes.
F11
Local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund is a critical component of a developer’s overall ability to raise funds for an AH development.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
Cities that proactively engage citizens, address zoning obstacles, make reasonable zoning concessions, work collaboratively with developers, provide local funding support, and are united in addressing NIMBY opposition, have been successful in attracting AH projects.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
The latest RHNA targets for cities and unincorporated Contra Costa County show a significant increase in the number of units that are expected to be permitted for very low- and low-income housing.
No recommendations for this finding
Agency Responses 18
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
▶
City of Antioch
September 12, 2023
•
17 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: +1
(+1, 1, 0)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, cities and the County may be subject to litigation from individuals, housing rights' organizations, developers, and/or HCD. Depending on court decisions, the cities and the County may lose additional local control, such as suspension of authority to issue building permits or approve certain land use permits; and/or cities and the County may be subject to court- issued fines, court receivership, and streamlined approval processes that remove local discretion. In addition, depending on specific programs, eligibility for some state funds requires a certified Housing Element (such as PLHA and St...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
for detailed RHNA numbers from previous Housing Element cycles. <b>Grand Jury Recommendations</b> R1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. The recommendation has been implemented. California's Housing Element Law acknowledges that, in order for the private market to adequately address the housing needs and deman...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
(a) for details. Further, in addressing HCD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) requirements there is a thorough review of the site selection via the Tax Credit Allocation's Committee (TCAC) Resource Map that designates areas of low-, moderate-, high-, and highest-resource within a jurisdiction and requires specific justification for placing affordable housing projects within low-resources areas. <b>14</b> | Page R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects an...
▶
City of Brentwood
September 13, 2023
•
12 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 1, 0)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, the City may be subject to litigation from individuals, housing rights’ organizations, developers, and/or HCD. Depending on court decisions, the City may lose additional local control, such as suspension of authority to issue building permits or approve certain land use permits; and/or the City may be subject to court-issued fines, court receivership, and streamlined approval processes that remove local discretion. Penalties also include losing eligibility for funding. Depending on specific programs, eligibility for some state funds, such as PLHA and State HOME funds, requires a certified Ho...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
for detailed RHNA numbers from previous Housing Element cycles. GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS R1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. The recommendation has been implemented. California’s Housing Element Law acknowledges that, in order for the private market to adequately address the housing needs and demands of C...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
for details. Further, in addressing HCD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) requirements, there is a thorough review of the site selection via the Tax Credit Allocation’s Committee (TCAC) Resource Map that designates areas of low-, moderate-, high-, and highest- resource within a jurisdiction and requires specific justification for placing affordable housing projects within low-resources areas. All of the sites identified as suitable for residential development in Brentwood’s Housing Element are located in high resource areas of the city. R7. Each city and the County should consider...
▶
City of Clayton
January 01, 2023
•
17 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 1, 0)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, local agencies may also be subject to litigation from individuals, housing rights organizations, developers, and/or HCD. Depending on court and administrative decisions, local agencies may lose additional local control, such as suspension of authority to issue building permits or approve certain land use permits; and/or local agencies may be subject to court-issued fines, court receivership, and streamlined approval processes that remove local discretion. In addition, depending on specific programs, eligibility for some state funds requires a certified Housing Element (such as PLHA and State...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
for detailed RHNA numbers from previous Housing Element cycles. Page 9 of 15 Grand Jury Recommendations R1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. The recommendation has been implemented. California’s Housing Element Law acknowledges that, in order for the private market to adequately address the housing needs and...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
(a) for details. Further, in addressing HCD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) requirements, there is a thorough review of the site selection via the Tax Credit Allocation’s Committee (TCAC) Resource Map that designates areas of low-, moderate-, high-, and highest-resource within a jurisdiction and requires specific justification for placing affordable housing projects within low-resources areas. R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider makin...
▶
City of Danville
September 05, 2023
•
9 pages
• 1 response
•
Score: -1
(+0, 0, -1)
View Details ▾
1 response to findings and recommendations
R5
Collect outcome data from BHS providers and programs to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
r 5, 2023 Page 6 the jurisdiction's progress toward achieving their RHNA. The Town's Planning Division is assigned with the responsibility of the above tasks and actively engages in them. Recommendation #2: Each city and the County should report AH progress and lack of progress using data across all four measured income groups. Special attention should be paid to tracking the housing needs of residents categorized as very low- and low-income. Cities and the County should communicate their progress, biannually, against RHNA targets at council and supervisor meetings. Response: The recommendatio...
▶
City of El Cerrito
September 13, 2023
•
7 pages
• 23 responses
•
Score: -2
(+2, 11, -4)
View Details ▾
23 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services available through BHS were a small portion of the outpatient services provided (7% in 2018; 8% in 2019). RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F1. Within existing city or County infrastructure there is no clear owner who is responsible for achieving RHNA permitting targets.” Response: The City disagrees with this finding. The City’s Community Development Department is tasked with specific responsibilities for overseeing the implementation of the Housing Element commitments and facilitating the permitting process to meet RHNA targets. State Housing Law only requires that jurisdictions plan to address barriers to development, accommodate all types of housing based on the RHNA allocations, and report their progress towards RHNA. The Com...
R1
Develop a hybrid plan to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services in their clinics. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan.” Response: This recommendation has been implemented. California’s Housing Element Law acknowledges that in order for the private market to adequately address the housing needs and demands of Californians, local governments must adopt plans and regulatory systems that prov...
F2
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS did not offer training to prepare clinicians or clients for effective and confidential use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F2. City and County officials see no direct path to meet state-mandated regional housing (RHNA) targets.” CITY HALL 10890 San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 215-4300 City of El Cerrito Response to Contra Costa Grand Jury Report No. 2306, "A Plan Without A Home” Septembe
R2
Coordinate with network provider groups to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R2. Each city and the County should report AH progress and lack of progress using data across all four measured income groups. Special attention should be paid to tracking the housing needs of residents categorized as very low- and low-income. Cities and the County should communicate their progress, biannually, against RHNA targets at council and supervisor meetings.” Response: This recommendation has been implemented. State Law (§65400) requires the City to prepare an annual progress report (APR) on our jurisdiction’s status and progress in implementing our Housing Element using forms and def...
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F3. There are currently no measurable penalties if a city or a County does not achieve RHNA targets in an approved housing element plan.” Response: The City partially disagrees with this finding. While there are no legal or financial penalties if the City does not achieve RHNA targets, there are penalties for not accommodating RHNA in a Housing Element and the consequences for not issuing adequate permits can be considered punitive. In addition, jurisdictions are subject to penalties if they do not adopt a Housing Element that is certified by the State, including designating adequate sites to ...
R3
Develop a training program for BHS clinicians, network providers, and support staff to facilitate the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
r 3, 2020 “to keep Contra Costa’s regional hospital open and staffed; fund community health centers, emergency response; support crucial safety- net services; invest in early childhood services; protect vulnerable populations; and for other essential county services.” Under the Measure X Program Allocation Summary, only $10 million dollars (about 13% of FY 2022-23 funding and about 4.5% of total funding) were allocated to a Local Housing Trust Fund; for FY 2023-24, $12 million dollars were allocated. The Measure X Housing Funds are to be dispersed by the Department of Conservation and Developm...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F4. Data published by ABAG shows that Contra Costa County and most of its cities have missed their current RHNA targets for very low- and low-income housing allocations. The allocation requirements continue to increase (16x for very low-income and 4x for low-income residents).” Response: The City partially disagrees with this finding. Many cities and the County as a whole missed their RHNA targets for very low and low-income housing, and the RHNA Allocation for very low- and low- income housing has continued to increase. However, the increase in RHNA allocation is not to the extent mentioned i...
R4
Develop a training program for clients to facilitate and provide support for the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R4. Each city and the County should consider reviewing existing processes and identifying changes that would address or resolve the specific obstacles identified in this report that hinder achieving RHNA allocation targets for very low- and low-income housing in their community.” Response: This recommendation has been implemented. As required by State Law, the City has reviewed existing processes and identified programs to address any potential constraints to development through the Housing Element’s Constraints and Zoning Analysis Section. “
F5
Tele-mental health services are appropriate for clients who are more stable, verbal and insightful. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F5. Many obstacles hinder the development of AH at the local level, specifically for very low and low- income housing, including: a. Limited availability of land; CITY HALL 10890 San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 215-4300 City of El Cerrito Response to Contra Costa Grand Jury Report No. 2306, "A Plan Without A Home” Septembe
R5
Collect outcome data from BHS providers and programs to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R5. Each city and the County should consider developing a public dashboard to report progress against RHNA targets.” Response: This recommendation has been implemented. The City must prepare an annual progress report on our status and progress in implementing our Housing Element using forms and definitions adopted by HCD. HCD compiles and showcases all APRs through their interactive digital data dashboard with downloadable data sets. “
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F6. Zoning changes are generally addressed only when a project is presented for development. Zoning obstacles include: a. Housing element plans that offer poor land choices for AH development; b. Restrictive height and high-density zoning policies; c. Lack of inclusionary housing ordinance(s) in many cities. Response: The City disagrees with this finding. In 2014, the City adopted the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, which was updated in 2022, to create an achievable development plan for the San Pablo Avenue corridor that promotes the City's goals and values. The Environmental Impact Report (EI...
R6
Collect outcome data from network providers to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation has not yet been implemented but will be implemented in the future. By: July 1, 2022. Implemented? Unknown
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R6. Each city and the County should consider, in their individual Housing Element plans, putting forth land zoned “suitable for residential use,” without development obstacles, and located strategically close to existing services, for AH purposes.” Response: This recommendation has been implemented. As required by State Law, jurisdictions are required to prepare a sites inventory identifying land suitable and available for residential development to meet the locality’s regional housing needs by income level. “
F7
The greater use of audio-only services has the limitation of not offering visual cues, which provide clinicians with important clinical information. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
f 7 Response: The City disagrees with this finding. There are multiple paths to meet the state-mandated regional housing needs allocation RHNA targets. First, at a policy level, the City must identify adequate sites to meet the RHNA targets through the Housing Element. In addition, the Housing Element includes strategies and programs to encourage housing development in accordance with State Law. The State will not certify a Housing Element that does not accommodate RHNA targets. Second, at an implementation or production level, the City can create pathways for others to construct housing, as a...
R7
Increase the use of MyChart health care information system to make clinical information accessible to clients and providers. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider making zoning changes in light of that review that will support AH in their community.” Response: This recommendation has been implemented. Through the Housing Element process, as well as the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan update, the City has reviewed our zoning policies and identified potential affordable housing development constraints unique to our jurisdiction. The Housing Element Program Section outlines for...
F8
Tele-mental health services are not appropriate fora. Homeless populationsb. Patients presenting with chronic schizophrenia with a limited capacity to manage the tasks of daily lifec. Patients prescribed controlled substances or injectable medication. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F8. Builder’s Remedy and SB35 projects do not address ingrained local obstacles identified in this report that prevent the completion of approved AH projects.” Response: The City agrees with this finding, but also acknowledges that the streamlined, ministerial processes created by SB 35 are, at least in part, intended to respond to some of the obstacles to development of affordable housing. CITY HALL 10890 San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 215-4300 City of El Cerrito Response to Contra Costa Grand Jury Report No. 2306, "A Plan Without A Home” Septembe
R8
Modernize the electronic data collection capabilities of the quality management program to provide meaningful information about mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R8. Cities should consider adopting an inclusionary housing ordinance as part of their standard development policy by the end o
F9
BHS has not incorporated tele-mental health into a comprehensive service delivery model to offer a broad range of opportunities for underserved populations to receive mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F9. When local Redevelopment Agencies (RDA’s) were discontinued by the state in 2012, the County and cities did not address the loss of funding for affordable housing or find alternative funding to support affordable housing projects until voters passed Measure X in Novembe
R9
Develop appropriate clinical metrics to evaluate outcomes that improve the effectiveness of mental health services provided. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R9. Each city and the County should consider how to prioritize the implementation of housing projects that promote development of very low- and low-income housing.” Response: This recommendation has been implemented. In 2014, the City adopted the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, which was updated in 2022, along with an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to create an achievable development plan for the San Pablo Avenue corridor that promotes the City's goals and values. The Plan created a form-based code, streamlined regulations, and serves to attract private investment. Further, the City Council...
F10
Access to outpatient mental health services in Contra Costa County suffers from difficulties with transportation to clinics, long wait times for appointments, and insufficient availability of after-hours appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F10. Measure X housing funds are not fully dedicated to building AH for very low- and low-income residents.” Response: The City agrees with this finding. “
R10
Seek grants and MHSA funding to upgrade the technological resources of the quality management program. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R10 in the subject Grand Jury Report. The City of El Cerrito wishes to note that it has been successful in addressing the need for affordable housing within our community. El Cerrito has been designated as a Prohousing jurisdiction by the State of California, one of only 27 jurisdictions in the State to be so designated, and the only jurisdiction within Contra Costa County. Further, the City of El Cerrito’s Housing Element was approved by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on August 22, 2023, one of five agencies out of the 20 jurisdictions within Contra Costa County tha...
F11
BHS has a limited number of clinicians who can provide culturally and linguistically sensitive services to diverse minority groups. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F11. Local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund is a critical component of a developer’s overall ability to raise funds for an AH development.” Response: The City disagrees with this finding. While local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund can be a beneficial component, it is not a critical factor in a developer's overall ability to raise funds for an AH development. Developers often require multiple sources of funding, or “stacking” strategies available to them, including federal and state grants, tax credits, private investments, and partnerships with nonpr...
F12
Increasing access to mental health services is a priority for Contra Costa County BHS. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F12. Cities that proactively engage citizens, address zoning obstacles, make reasonable zoning concessions, work collaboratively with developers, provide local funding support, and are united in addressing NIMBY opposition, have been successful in attracting AH projects.” Response: The City partially disagrees with this finding. The City of El Cerrito agrees that proactive strategies can help attract affordable housing developers and mitigate the barriers to housing production; however, proactive strategies alone do not result in affordable housing projects being constructed. For example, whil...
F13
The FCC reported 99.2% of Contra Costa County residents have access to internet broadband for greater use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F13. The latest RHNA targets for cities and unincorporated Contra Costa County show a significant increase in the number of units that are expected to be permitted for very low and low-income housing.” Response: The City partially disagrees with this finding. It is true that RHNA Allocation for very low- and low-income housing has continued to increase. However, the increase in RHNA allocation is not to the extent mentioned in this report. RHNA numbers from the past 3 cycles indicate that the current (6th) cycle has had the largest increase o
▶
City of Hercules
September 12, 2023
•
16 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 1, 0)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, cities and the County may be subject to litigation from individuals, housing rights' organizations, developers, and/or HCD. Depending on court decisions, the cities and the County may lose additional local control, such as suspension of authority to issue building permits or approve certain land use permits; and/or cities and the County may be subject to court-issued fines, court receivership, and streamlined approval processes that remove local discretion. In addition, depending on specific programs, eligibility for some state funds requires a certified Housing Element (such as PLHA and Sta...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
for detailed RHNA numbers from previous Housing Element cycles. Recommendations RI. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. The recommendation has been implemented. California's Housing Element Law acknowledges that, in order for the private market to adequately address the housing needs and demands of Californians...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
(a) for details. Further, in addressing HCD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) requirements there is a thorough review of the site selection via the Tax Credit Allocation's Committee (TCAC) Resource Map that designates areas of low-, moderate-, high-, and highest- resource within a jurisdiction and requires specific justification for placing affordable housing projects within low-resources areas. R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider makin...
▶
City of Lafayette
June 16, 2023
•
9 pages
• 1 response
View Details ▾
1 response to findings and recommendations
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
(a) for details. Further, in addressing HCD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) requirements there is a thorough review of the site selection via the Tax Credit Allocation's Committee (TCAC) Resource Map that designates areas of low-, moderate-, high-, and highest-resource within Lafayette. R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider making zoning changes in light of that review that will support AH in their community. The recommendation has been...
▶
City of Martinez
September 13, 2023
•
12 pages
• 23 responses
•
Score: -1
(+3, 9, -4)
View Details ▾
23 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services available through BHS were a small portion of the outpatient services provided (7% in 2018; 8% in 2019). RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F1 because while a single entity is responsible for reporting on RHNA permitting targets, jurisdictions do not develop housing projects. State Housing Law only requires that jurisdictions plan to address barriers to development, accommodate all types of housing based on the RHNA allocations, and report their progress towards RHNA. The Community and Economic Development Department is responsible for preparing the Annual Progress Report (“APR”) as required by State Housing Law. These reports are presented before the City Council early in the calendar year, prior to submission to HCD. Furthermore...
R1
Develop a hybrid plan to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services in their clinics. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. The recommendation has been implemented. The Planning Manager has been assigned to ensure those elements of meeting the allocated RHNA targets that are within the City's control (the programs and objectives of the Housing Element) are implemented. The goals of these progr...
F2
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS did not offer training to prepare clinicians or clients for effective and confidential use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F2. Without a dedicated funding source from the State of California or other mechanism to obtain additional funding, most local jurisdictions throughout the State will continue to miss their RHNA targets for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Units affordable to lower income households require significant subsidies since the cost of construction exceeds the return on investment and there is inadequate funding to support the housing need. The City’s Draft 2023- 2031 Housing Element identifies potential solutions to accommodate the RHNA targets and the City is actively exploring an...
R2
Coordinate with network provider groups to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R2. Each city and the County should report AH progress and lack of progress using data across all four measured income groups. Special attention should be paid to tracking the housing needs of residents categorized as very low- and low-income. Cities and the County should communicate their progress biannually, against RHNA targets at council and supervisor Meetings. The recommendation has been implemented. State Law (§65400) requires each jurisdiction (city council or board of supervisors) to prepare an annual progress report (“APR”) on the jurisdiction’s status and progress in implementing it...
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F3. There are currently no measurable penalties if a city or a County does not achieve RHNA targets in an approved housing element plan. Disagree. While there are no legal or financial penalties if the City does not achieve their RHNA targets (nor should there be as the actual construction of these units is dependent in large part upon the private sector and the availability of funding) there are punitive consequences. For jurisdictions that do not meet their RHNA targets, developers may choose to use a ministerial, streamlined process for housing projects pursuant to Senate Bill 35. This outc...
R3
Develop a training program for BHS clinicians, network providers, and support staff to facilitate the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R3. Each city and the County should consider creating a dedicated AH commission comprised of a multi-disciplinary team of diverse citizens and led by a current, nonelected, city expert in planning. Each commission would be charged with providing a community voice in the process and helping to identify and address obstacles that hinder the development of affordable housing projects in their community. The recommendation will not be implemented. The City appreciates the thoughtful recommendation to create a dedicated Affordable Housing (“AH”) Commission comprised of a multi-disciplinary team of ...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F4. Data published by ABAG shows that Contra Costa County and most of its cities have missed their current RHNA targets for very low- and low-income housing allocations. The allocation requirements continue to increase (16x for very low-income and 4x for low-income residents). Page 3 o
R4
Develop a training program for clients to facilitate and provide support for the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R4. Each city and the County should consider reviewing existing processes and identifying changes that would address or resolve the specific obstacles identified in this report that hinder achieving RHNA allocation targets for very low- and low-income housing in their Community. The recommendation has been implemented. As required by state law, the City has reviewed existing processes and identified programs to address any potential constraints to development through the 2023-2031 Housing Element Update process.
F5
Tele-mental health services are appropriate for clients who are more stable, verbal and insightful. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F5. Many obstacles hinder the development of AH at the local level, specifically for very low and low- income housing, including: a. Limited availability of land; b. Restrictive zoning policies specific to AH development; c. Limited developer interest to bring projects forward; d. Limited available funding; e. Lack of community support; f. NIMBY opposition & city council response to NIMBY opposition. Partially Disagree. While it is true that items a, b, c, d, and f can hinder the development of affordable housing, the City has taken significant steps to promote the development and preservation...
R5
Collect outcome data from BHS providers and programs to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R5. Each city and the County should consider developing a public dashboard to report progress against RHNA targets. The recommendation has been implemented. Each jurisdiction (city council or board of supervisors) must prepare an annual progress report (APR) on the jurisdiction’s status and progress in implementing its housing element using forms and definitions adopted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). (Government Code Section 65400.) Each jurisdiction’s APR must be submitted to HCD and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) by April 1 of e...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F6. Zoning changes are generally addressed only when a project is presented for development. Zoning obstacles include: a. Housing element plans that offer poor land choices for AH development; b. Restrictive height and high-density zoning policies; c. Lack of inclusionary housing ordinance(s) in many cities. Partially Disagree. AB 1397 set forth strict criteria for adequate sites. These criteria are somewhat arbitrary (e.g., not smaller than 0.5 acre and not larger than 10 acres). The requirement to demonstrate substantial evidence that existing uses do not impede redevelopment also tends to s...
R6
Collect outcome data from network providers to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation has not yet been implemented but will be implemented in the future. By: July 1, 2022. Implemented? Unknown
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R6. Each city and the County should consider, in their individual Housing Element plans, putting forth land zoned "suitable for residential use," without development obstacles, and located strategically close to existing services, for AH purposes. Page 10 o
F7
The greater use of audio-only services has the limitation of not offering visual cues, which provide clinicians with important clinical information. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F7. Penalties directed at cities and the County (financial, loss of control over local planning) are tied to not meeting state deadlines for Housing Element plan approval. Agree. The City agrees there are penalties that are directly related to not meeting statutory deadline of the Housing Element. Builder’s Remedy, where individuals may apply for a building permit on land that is not designated for housing, is one such penalty that is directly linked to meeting state deadlines for Housing Elements. In addition, depending on specific programs, eligibility for some state funds requires a certifi...
R7
Increase the use of MyChart health care information system to make clinical information accessible to clients and providers. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider making zoning changes in light of that review that will support AH in their community. The recommendation has been implemented. Through the Housing Element process, jurisdictions have reviewed their zoning policies and identified potential affordable housing development constraints unique to their jurisdiction. The Housing Element Program Section outlines forthcoming changes to their zoning policies with specified...
F8
Tele-mental health services are not appropriate fora. Homeless populationsb. Patients presenting with chronic schizophrenia with a limited capacity to manage the tasks of daily lifec. Patients prescribed controlled substances or injectable medication. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F8. Builder's Remedy and SB35 projects do not address ingrained local obstacles identified in this report that prevent the completion of approved AH projects. Partially Disagree. While Builder's Remedy and SB35 projects are valuable tools that can expedite affordable housing development, they may not comprehensively address all the ingrained local obstacles identified in this report that hinder the completion of approved AH projects. The effectiveness of these streamlined processes can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and while they Page 6 o
R8
Modernize the electronic data collection capabilities of the quality management program to provide meaningful information about mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R8. Cities should consider adopting an inclusionary housing ordinance as part of their standard development policy by the end o
F9
BHS has not incorporated tele-mental health into a comprehensive service delivery model to offer a broad range of opportunities for underserved populations to receive mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F9. When local Redevelopment Agencies (RDA’s) were discontinued by the state in 2012, the County and cities did not address the loss of funding for affordable housing or find alternative funding to support affordable housing projects until voters passed Measure X in Novembe
R9
Develop appropriate clinical metrics to evaluate outcomes that improve the effectiveness of mental health services provided. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R9. Each city and the County should consider how to prioritize the implementation of housing projects that promote development of very low- and low-income housing. The recommendation has not been implemented. Through the City's 2023-2031 Housing Element Update process, the City reviewed its zoning policies and identified potential affordable housing development constraints and developed programs to address those constraints. More information is available at https://www.cityofmartinez.org/departments/planning/housing-element. To further promote affordable housing production, the following progr...
F10
Access to outpatient mental health services in Contra Costa County suffers from difficulties with transportation to clinics, long wait times for appointments, and insufficient availability of after-hours appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F10. Measure X housing funds are not fully dedicated to building AH for very low- and low-income residents. Agree. The City agrees with this finding.
R10
Seek grants and MHSA funding to upgrade the technological resources of the quality management program. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R10. Each city and the County should consider prioritizing Measure X funding requests that support projects that address RHNA targets for very low- and low-income residents. Each city and County should consider reporting regularly to their residents on the use of Measure X funds for such purposes. The recommendation will not be implemented. Measure X is a countywide 20-year, ½ cent sales tax approved by Contra Costa County voters on Novembe
F11
BHS has a limited number of clinicians who can provide culturally and linguistically sensitive services to diverse minority groups. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F11. Local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund is a critical component of a developer’s overall ability to raise funds for an AH development. Agree. Measure X is allocating $12 million per year for affordable housing development. This funding level is woefully inadequate when compared to the amount of funding required to facilitate construction of low- and very low-income housing development throughout the County. Affordable housing developers typically require multiple sources of financing such as federal and state grants, tax credits, private investments, and partnerships w...
F12
Increasing access to mental health services is a priority for Contra Costa County BHS. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
f 12 The City’s key points include the following:
▪ Lack of Funding: The shortage of funding poses a significant obstacle to the development of affordable housing projects in our jurisdiction. This scarcity hampers the progress of initiatives aimed at addressing the housing needs of our community.
▪ Competition for Funding: When funding becomes available, developers often face stiff competition. This intense competition can lead developers to focus only on projects that have a higher likelihood of receiving funding, potentially leaving out projects that may cater to specific, underserved demog...
F13
The FCC reported 99.2% of Contra Costa County residents have access to internet broadband for greater use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F13. The latest RHNA targets for cities and unincorporated Contra Costa County show a significant increase in the number of units that are expected to be permitted for very low and low-income housing. Partially Disagree. It is true that RHNA Allocation for very low- and low-income housing has continued to increase. However, the increase in RHNA allocation is not to the extent mentioned in this report. RHNA numbers from the past 3 cycles indicate that the current (6th) cycle has had the largest increase o
▶
City of Oakley
September 13, 2023
•
8 pages
• 23 responses
•
Score: -1
(+2, 13, -3)
View Details ▾
23 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services available through BHS were a small portion of the outpatient services provided (7% in 2018; 8% in 2019). RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Finding 1 because while a single entity is responsible for reporting on RHNA permitting targets, jurisdictions do not develop housing projects. State Housing Law only requires that jurisdictions plan to address barriers to development, accommodate all types of housing based on the RHNA allocations, and report their progress towards RHNA.
R1
Develop a hybrid plan to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services in their clinics. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. City response: The recommendation has been implemented. California’s Housing Element Law acknowledges that local governments must adopt plans and regulatory systems that provide opportunities for (and do not unduly constrain) housing development. Cities and Counties are n...
F2
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS did not offer training to prepare clinicians or clients for effective and confidential use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Finding 2 because while City and County officials recognize the challenges ahead, our Housing Element identifies a clear path to accommodate the RHNA targets and we are actively exploring and implementing strategies to work towards meeting state-mandated regional housing (RHNA) targets. City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.CI.Oakley.CA.US
R2
Coordinate with network provider groups to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R2. Each city and the County should report AH progress and lack of progress using data across all four measured income groups. Special attention should be paid to tracking the housing needs of residents categorized as very low- and low-income. Cities and the County should communicate their progress, biannually, against RHNA targets at council and supervisor meetings. City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 5 O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us City response: This recommendation has been implemented. The City completes an annual housing report that is submitted...
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Finding 3 because while there are no legal or financial penalties if the cities and County do not achieve their RHNA targets, there are penalties for not accommodating RHNA in a Housing Element and the consequences for not issuing adequate permits can be considered punitive.
R3
Develop a training program for BHS clinicians, network providers, and support staff to facilitate the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R3. Each city and the County should consider creating a dedicated AH commission comprised of a multi-disciplinary team of diverse citizens and led by a current, nonelected, city expert in planning. Each commission would be charged with providing a community voice in the process and helping to identify and address obstacles that hinder the development of affordable housing projects in their community. City response: The recommendation will not be implemented. While we do not intend to pursue the recommended dedicated AH commission, we value the underlying principle of community engagement and r...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F4. Data published by ABAG shows that Contra Costa County and most of its cities have missed their current RHNA targets for very low- and low-income housing allocations. The allocation requirements continue to increase (16x for very low-income and 4x for low-income residents). City response: Partially Disagree. It is true that many cities and the County as a whole missed their RHNA targets for very low and low-income housing, and that RHNA Allocation for very low- and low-income housing has continued to increase. However, the increase in RHNA allocation is not to the extent mentioned in this r...
R4
Develop a training program for clients to facilitate and provide support for the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R4. Each city and the County should consider reviewing existing processes and identifying changes that would address or resolve the specific obstacles identified in this report that hinder achieving RHNA allocation targets for very low- and low-income housing in their community. City response: The recommendation has been implemented. Comprehensive Process Review: As required by State Law, jurisdictions have reviewed existing processes and identified programs to address any potential constraints to development through the Housing Element’s Constraints and Zoning Analysis Section.
F5
Tele-mental health services are appropriate for clients who are more stable, verbal and insightful. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F5. Many obstacles hinder the development of AH at the local level, specifically for very low- and low-income housing, including: a. Limited availability of land; b. Restrictive zoning policies specific to AH development; c. Limited developer interest to bring projects forward; d. Limited available funding; e. Lack of community support; City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 2 O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us f. NIMBY opposition & city council response to NIMBY opposition. City response: Partially Disagree. The City partially disagrees with this finding. T...
R5
Collect outcome data from BHS providers and programs to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R5. Each city and the County should consider developing a public dashboard to report progress against RHNA targets. City response: The recommendation has been implemented. Each jurisdiction (city council or board of supervisors) must prepare an annual progress report (APR) on the jurisdiction’s status and progress in implementing its housing element using forms and definitions adopted by City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 6 O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). (Government Code Section 65...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F6. Zoning changes are generally addressed only when a project is presented for development. Zoning obstacles include: a. Housing element plans that offer poor land choices for AH development; b. Restrictive height and high-density zoning policies; c. Lack of inclusionary housing ordinance(s) in many cities. City response: Partially Disagree. The City of Oakley has relied upon the Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) zoning process to identify viable properties that are central to transportation, services, and amenities that can be developed for Affordable Housing. In past Housing Element cycles, ...
R6
Collect outcome data from network providers to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation has not yet been implemented but will be implemented in the future. By: July 1, 2022. Implemented? Unknown
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R6. Each city and the County should consider, in their individual Housing Element plans, putting forth land zoned “suitable for residential use,” without development obstacles, and located strategically close to existing services, for AH purposes. City response: The recommendation has been implemented. This recommendation has been implemented in previous Housing Cycles by utilizing an Affordable Housing Overlay.
F7
The greater use of audio-only services has the limitation of not offering visual cues, which provide clinicians with important clinical information. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F7. Penalties directed at cities and the County (financial, loss of control over local planning) are tied to not meeting state deadlines for Housing Element plan approval. City response: Partially Disagree. We agree that there are penalties that are directly related to not meeting statutory deadline of the Housing Element. Builder’s Remedy, where individuals may apply for a building permit on land that is not designated for housing, is one such penalty that is directly linked to meeting state deadlines for Housing Elements.
R7
Increase the use of MyChart health care information system to make clinical information accessible to clients and providers. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider making zoning changes in light that review that will support AH in their community. City response: The recommendation has been implemented. This recommendation has been implemented as the City has updated its Density Bonus Ordinance numerous times in the past and is in the process of updating it again with a completion date of Novembe
F8
Tele-mental health services are not appropriate fora. Homeless populationsb. Patients presenting with chronic schizophrenia with a limited capacity to manage the tasks of daily lifec. Patients prescribed controlled substances or injectable medication. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F8. Builder’s Remedy and SB35 projects do not address ingrained local obstacles identified in this report that prevent the completion of approved AH projects. City response: Disagree. Builder’s remedy and SB35 are not intended to address local obstacles. Instead, they are intended to provide a streamlined development process for jurisdictions that have fallen out of compliance with State Housing Law (Builder’s Remedy) or where housing production does not meet the RHNA targets (SB35). The Housing Element and its associated programs are intended to address potential local constraints to housing ...
R8
Modernize the electronic data collection capabilities of the quality management program to provide meaningful information about mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R8. Cities should consider adopting an inclusionary housing ordinance as part of their standard development policy by the end o
F9
BHS has not incorporated tele-mental health into a comprehensive service delivery model to offer a broad range of opportunities for underserved populations to receive mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F9. When local Redevelopment Agencies (RDA’s) were discontinued by the state in 2012, the County and cities did not address the loss of funding for affordable housing or find alternative funding to support affordable housing projects until voters passed Measure X in Novembe
R9
Develop appropriate clinical metrics to evaluate outcomes that improve the effectiveness of mental health services provided. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R9. Each city and the County should consider how to prioritize the implementation of housing projects that promote development of very low- and low-income housing. City response: This recommendation has been implemented. For example, the City has provided important density bonuses for very low- and low-income housing projects and has contributed resources to projects as well in the past. City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 7 O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us
F10
Access to outpatient mental health services in Contra Costa County suffers from difficulties with transportation to clinics, long wait times for appointments, and insufficient availability of after-hours appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F10. Measure X housing funds are not fully dedicated to building AH for very low- and low-income residents. City response: Agree.
R10
Seek grants and MHSA funding to upgrade the technological resources of the quality management program. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
R10. Each city and the County should consider prioritizing Measure X funding requests that support projects that address RHNA targets for very low- and low-income residents. Each city and County should consider reporting regularly to their residents on the use of Measure X funds for such purposes. City response: The recommendation requires further analysis. Measure X funds are dispersed into several areas besides Affordable Housing, and it remains to be seen if sufficient funds will make it to the cities in the County that can help with Affordable Housing Projects. The use of Measure X funds f...
F11
BHS has a limited number of clinicians who can provide culturally and linguistically sensitive services to diverse minority groups. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F11. Local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund is a critical component of a developer’s overall ability to raise funds for an AH development. City response: Disagree. While local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund in Contra Costa County can be a beneficial component, it is not a critical factor in a developer's overall ability to raise funds for an affordable housing (AH) development. Developers often require multiple sources of funding, or “stacking” strategies available to them, including federal and state grants, tax credits, private investments, and par...
F12
Increasing access to mental health services is a priority for Contra Costa County BHS. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F12. Cities that proactively engage citizens, address zoning obstacles, make reasonable zoning concessions, work collaboratively with developers, provide local funding support, and are united in City of Oakley | 3231 Main Street, Oakley, CA 94561 4 O (925) 625-7000 | F (925) 625-9859 | www.ci.oakley.ca.us addressing NIMBY opposition, have been successful in attracting AH projects. City response: Partially Disagree. The City of Oakley has proactively engaged citizens, addressed zoning obstacles, identified viable sites for affordable housing, makes reasonable zoning concessions, works collabora...
F13
The FCC reported 99.2% of Contra Costa County residents have access to internet broadband for greater use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F13. The latest RHNA targets for cities and unincorporated Contra Costa County show a significant increase in the number of units that are expected to be permitted for very low- and low-income housing. City response: Agree. Grand Jury Recommendations and City Responses
▶
City of Orinda
September 12, 2023
•
18 pages
• 4 responses
•
Score: +1
(+1, 2, 0)
View Details ▾
4 responses to findings and recommendations
F2
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS did not offer training to prepare clinicians or clients for effective and confidential use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, we have noted the defense of the lawsuit challenging the Countryhouse assisted living facility. The City’s recently approved Housing Element is also 6 subject to a legal challenge via a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) lawsuit, which again, the City is actively defending. One of the obstacles not mentioned in the Grand Jury report which the City is finding difficult to navigate relate to conflicting State goals and requirements, especially as they relate to housing production and the desire to reduce development in areas at risk to wildfire. F6. Zoning changes are generally addres...
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, the City may be subject to litigation from individuals, housing rights’ organizations, developers, and/or HCD. Depending on court decisions, the City may lose additional local control, such as suspension of authority to issue building permits or approve certain land use permits; and/or the City may be subject to court-issued fines, court receivership, and streamlined approval processes that remove local discretion. In addition, depending on specific programs, eligibility for some state funds requires a certified Housing Element (such as PLHA and State HOME funds). Finally, loss of local cont...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
for detailed RHNA numbers from previous Housing Element cycles. 11 RECOMMENDATIONS Grand Jury Recommendations R1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. The recommendation has been implemented. California’s Housing Element Law acknowledges that, in order for the private market to adequately address the housing nee...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
(a) for details. Further, in addressing HCD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) requirements there is a thorough review of the site selection via the Tax Credit Allocation’s Committee (TCAC) Resource Map that designates areas of low-, moderate- , high-, and highest-resource within a jurisdiction and requires specific justification for placing affordable housing projects within low-resources areas. R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider makin...
▶
City of Pinole
September 13, 2023
•
16 pages
• 2 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 1, 0)
View Details ▾
2 responses to findings and recommendations
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, jurisdictions may be subject to litigation from individuals, housing rights’ organizations, developers, and/or HCD. Depending on court decisions, jurisdictions may lose additional local control, such as suspension of authority to issue building permits or approve certain land use permits; and/or cities and the County may be subject to court-issued fines, court receivership, and streamlined approval processes that remove local discretion. In addition, depending on specific programs, eligibility for some state funds requires a certified Housing Element (such as PLHA and State HOME funds). Fina...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
(c) for details on the success of the ordinance. R9. Each city and the County should consider how to prioritize the implementation of housing projects that promote development of very low- and low-income housing. Response: The recommendation (R9) has been implemented. Due to permit streamlining requirements, it is critical for cities and counties to assess all development projects in the sequence they are received. Nevertheless, jurisdictions have implemented incentives and expedited permitting processes for certain categories of housing type or tenure. As a part of the City of Pinole’s adopte...
▶
City of Pittsburg
August 24, 2023
•
8 pages
• 1 response
View Details ▾
1 response to findings and recommendations
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
f 6 Civil Grand Jury Recommendations Recommendation No. 1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA set forth in the housing element plan. The recommendation has been implemented. The City of Pittsburg has dedicated staff in the Community Development Department and Community Services Department that report annually to HCD on the progress of achieving RHNA targ...
▶
City of Pleasant Hill
September 11, 2023
•
53 pages
• 24 responses
•
Score: +2
(+4, 10, -2)
View Details ▾
24 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services available through BHS were a small portion of the outpatient services provided (7% in 2018; 8% in 2019). RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Finding 1 because, while the City is responsible for reporting on RHNA permitting targets, the City does not develop housing projects. State Housing Law only requires that jurisdictions plan to address barriers to development, accommodate various types of housing based on the RHNA allocations, and report their progress towards RHNA. The City of Pleasant Hill Planning Division is responsible for preparing the Annual Progress Report (APR) as required by State Housing Law, which City staff presents to City Council early in the calendar year and prior to submission to HCD. Furthermore, each jurisd...
R1
Develop a hybrid plan to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services in their clinics. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan.
F2
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS did not offer training to prepare clinicians or clients for effective and confidential use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Finding 2 because, while the City recognizes the challenges ahead, the City of Pleasant Hill Housing Element identifies a clear path to accommodate the RHNA targets. The City actively and continuously explores and implements policies, programs, and strategies to satisfy state-mandated RHNA targets. Despite the complexity of the task, the City is committed to finding viable solutions and collaborating with stakeholders to address the housing needs of the region. While it may be a challenging endeavor, the dedication and proactive approach of the City demonstrates a commitment to addressing the ...
R2
Coordinate with network provider groups to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R2. data across all four measured income groups. Special attention should be paid to tracking the housing needs of residents categorized as very low- and low-income. Cities and the County should communicate their progress, biannually, against RHNA targets at council and supervisor meetings. City Response The recommendation has been implemented, as the City of Pleasant Hill completes State of California Annual Housing Reports that provide this information on an annual basis. Before the report is sent to the State, it is reviewed and accepted by the City Council.
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Finding 3, as a noncompliant Housing Element does disqualify the City from receiving various State originated grant funding for various City purposes, which is a measureable financial penalty. In addition, there are currently no legal or financial penalties if the City of Pleasant Hill does not achieve its RHNA targets, though there are penalties for not accommodating RHNA in a Housing Element and the consequences for not issuing adequate permits can be considered punitive. In addition, jurisdictions are subject to penalties if they do not adopt a Housing Element that is certified by the State...
R3
Develop a training program for BHS clinicians, network providers, and support staff to facilitate the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R3. Each City and the County should consider creating a dedicated AH commission comprised of a multi-disciplinary team of diverse citizens and led by a current, nonelected, city expert in planning. Each commission would be charged with providing a community voice in the process and helping to identify and address obstacles that hinder the development of affordable housing projects in their community. City Response: The recommendation will not be implemented. We appreciate the thoughtful recommendation to create a dedicated Affordable Housing (AH) commission comprising a multi-disciplinary team...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F4. missed their current RHNA targets for very low- and low-income housing allocations. The allocation requirements continue to increase (16x for very low-income and 4x for low- income residents). City Response: Partially Disagree. It is true that many cities and the County as a whole missed their RHNA targets for very low and low-income housing, and that the RHNA for very low- and low-income housing has continued to increase. However, the increase in RHNA is not to the extent mentioned in this report. RHNA numbers from the past three cycles demonstrate that the current cycle (the 6th cycle) h...
R4
Develop a training program for clients to facilitate and provide support for the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
R4. identifying changes that would address or resolve the specific obstacles identified in this report that hinder achieving RHNA allocation targets for very low- and low- income housing in their community. City Response: The recommendation has not been fully implemented, but will be implemented in the future, as the City is starting a comprehensive zoning ordinance update that will consider provisions of the recently adopted Housing Element, and will better address development for affordable housing projects. In addition, the adopted Housing Element contains various programs that will better ...
F5
Tele-mental health services are appropriate for clients who are more stable, verbal and insightful. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F5. Many obstacles hinder the development of AH at the local level, specifically for very low- and low-income housing, including: a. Limited availability of land; b. Restrictive zoning policies specific to AH development; c. Limited developer interest to bring projects forward; d. Limited available funding; e. Lack of community support; f. NIMBY opposition & city council response to NIMBY opposition. City Response: Partially Disagree, as noted below: a. The City of Pleasant Hill is mostly built-out, with small pockets of vacant land available throughout the City. This results in the majority o...
R5
Collect outcome data from BHS providers and programs to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R5. Each City and the County should consider developing a public dashboard to report progress against RHNA targets. City Response: The recommendation has been implemented, as the City prepares annual reports, submits it to the State that notes progress against RHNA targets, and is available for public viewing. In addition, the City does maintain a project list for all active projects in the city, including residential projects. The City will consider creating and maintaining a dashboard of residential housing projects on the City website that can be reviewed by the public, as suggested.
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F6. Zoning changes are generally addressed only when a project is presented for development. Zoning obstacles include: a. Housing element plans that offer poor land choices for AH development; b. Restrictive height and high-density zoning policies; c. Lack of inclusionary housing ordinance(s) in many cities. City Response: Partially Disagree, as noted below: a. The recent City Housing Element identifies affordable housing sites within close proximity to alternative modes of transportation and necessary services. However, comments from the State HCD have required revisions to the City's invento...
R6
Collect outcome data from network providers to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation has not yet been implemented but will be implemented in the future. By: July 1, 2022. Implemented? Unknown
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R6. Each City and the County should consider, in their individual Housing Element plans, putting forth land zoned "suitable for residential use," without development obstacles, and located strategically close to existing services, for AH purposes. City Response: The recommendation has been implemented, as the City of Pleasant Hill recently adopted its Housing Element that addresses the recommendation noted above. Many housing opportunity sites identified in the approved element are located in areas that have access to existing services, and the zoning ordinance is being updated to better addre...
F7
The greater use of audio-only services has the limitation of not offering visual cues, which provide clinicians with important clinical information. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F7. Penalties directed at cities and the County (financial, loss of control over local planning) are tied to not meeting state deadlines for Housing Element plan approval City Response: Agree
R7
Increase the use of MyChart health care information system to make clinical information accessible to clients and providers. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider making zoning changes in light of that review that will support AH in their community. City Response: The recommendation has been implemented. Through the Housing Element process, the City has reviewed its existing zoning policies and identified potential affordable housing development constraints. The City included Housing Element Programs that outline forthcoming changes to zoning policies with specified timefra...
F8
Tele-mental health services are not appropriate fora. Homeless populationsb. Patients presenting with chronic schizophrenia with a limited capacity to manage the tasks of daily lifec. Patients prescribed controlled substances or injectable medication. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F8. Builder's Remedy and S835 projects do not address ingrained local obstacles identified in this report that prevent the completion of approved AH projects. City Response: Partially Disagree. While Builder's Remedy and SB35 are tools available to developers to expedite review of affordable housing development proposals, they may not comprehensively address all the ingrained local obstacles identified in this report that hinder the completion of approved AH projects. The effectiveness of these streamlined processes can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and while they can help overcome c...
R8
Modernize the electronic data collection capabilities of the quality management program to provide meaningful information about mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R 8 ARCADIA 35 CERES 62 EAST PALO ALTO 9 ARCATA 36 CHOWCHILLA 63 EL CAJON 10 ARROYO GRANDE 37 CITRUS HEIGHTS 64 EL CENTRO 11 ARVIN 47 38 CLAYTON 65 EL MONTE 12 AUBURN 39 CLEARLAKE 66 ESCALON 13 AVALON 40 CLOVERDALE 67 ESCONDIDO 14 AVENAL 41 COACHELLA 68 ETNA 15 AZUSA 42 COLMA 69 EUREKA 16 BAKERSFIELD 43 COLTON 70 EXETE
F9
BHS has not incorporated tele-mental health into a comprehensive service delivery model to offer a broad range of opportunities for underserved populations to receive mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F9. When local Redevelopment Agencies (RDA's) were discontinued by the state in 2012, the County and cities did not address the loss of funding for affordable housing or find alternative funding to support affordable housing projects until voters passed Measure X in Novembe
R9
Develop appropriate clinical metrics to evaluate outcomes that improve the effectiveness of mental health services provided. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R9. housing projects that promote development of very low- and low-income housing. City Response: The recommendation has been implemented, as the adopted Housing Element includes a policy/program that provides prioritization of AH projects. In addition, the adopted Housing Element includes policies and programs that promote AH development including Policies H- 2.2, H-2.3, H-3.1, H-3.3 and Programs V, X, Z, CC, JJ. RIO. Each city and the County should consider prioritizing Measure X funding requests that support projects that address RHNA targets for very low- and low-income residents. Each cit...
F10
Access to outpatient mental health services in Contra Costa County suffers from difficulties with transportation to clinics, long wait times for appointments, and insufficient availability of after-hours appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F10. Measure X housing funds are not fully dedicated to building AH for very low- and low- income residents. City Response: Agree
R10
Seek grants and MHSA funding to upgrade the technological resources of the quality management program. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R10. Each city and the County should consider prioritizing Measure X funding requests that support projects that address RHNA targets for very low- and low-income residents. Each city and County should consider reporting regularly to their residents on the use of Measure X funds for such purposes. alterial designation of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the patron and medicality and heap findered minimization before the control of the...
F11
BHS has a limited number of clinicians who can provide culturally and linguistically sensitive services to diverse minority groups. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F11. Local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund is a critical component of a developer's overall ability to raise funds for an AH development. City Response: Partially Disagree. Bond funding requires voters' approval. Given timing considerations (economic conditions and bond measures for other competing interests), bond financing has not been the most significant source of affordable housing financing. While local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund in Contra Costa County are a beneficial component to help fund affordable housing construction, the amount of f...
R11
Allocate funds for BHS to upgrade its quality management program. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted. An explanation was given. Summary of Responses
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
r 11, 2023 Honorable Jill C. Fannin, Judge of the Superior Court Cynthia Roberts, Foreperson, 2022-2023 Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury P.O. Box 431 Martinez, CA 94553 Also via email to [email protected] City of Pleasant Hill's Response to Report No. 2306, Affordable Housing "A Plan Without a RE: Home" Dear Judge Fannin and Foreperson Roberts: In June 2023, the Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury issued Report No. 2306 entitled "A Plan Without a Home." Below find the City of Pleasant Hill's responses to the report's findings and recomm...
F12
Increasing access to mental health services is a priority for Contra Costa County BHS. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F12. zoning concessions, work collaboratively with developers, provide local funding support, and are united in addressing NIMBY opposition, have been successful in attracting AH projects. City Response: Partially Disagree. The City agrees that proactive strategies can help attract affordable housing developers and mitigate the barriers to housing production; however, proactive strategies alone do not yield affordable housing projects. For example, while the City of Pleasant Hill engages in many of the above strategies, a variety of other obstacles to affordable housing development exist beyon...
F13
The FCC reported 99.2% of Contra Costa County residents have access to internet broadband for greater use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F13. The latest RHNA targets for cities and unincorporated Contra Costa County show a significant increase in the number of units that are expected to be permitted for very low- and low-income housing. City Response: Agree <b>Recommendations:</b> RI. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. City Response: The recomm...
▶
City of Richmond
September 13, 2023
•
17 pages
• 7 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 3, 0)
View Details ▾
7 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services available through BHS were a small portion of the outpatient services provided (7% in 2018; 8% in 2019). RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
f 1-580, a housing in-lieu fee for rental projects, and non-residential linkage fee. The fees collected through the ordinance are intended to fund affordable housing projects throughout the City. Additionally, the City has applied for the State Prohousing Designation which will give Richmond priority for: 1) the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities Program; 2) Infill Infrastructure Grant Program; 3) Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program and other housing related funds. It should be noted that the City of Richmond was recently awarded the Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities (A...
F2
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS did not offer training to prepare clinicians or clients for effective and confidential use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
Finding 2 because while City of Richmond officials recognize the challenges ahead, our Housing Element identifies a clear path to accommodate the RHNA targets and we are actively exploring and implementing strategies to work towards meeting state mandated RHNA targets. The City's regulatory environment successfully facilitated the permitting and development of affordable housing in the last planning cycle, and the City is going further with its programs and CoR Response - "A Plan Without a Home" Page 6 o
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Finding 3 because while there are no legal or financial penalties if the cities and County do not achieve their RHNA targets, there are penalties for not accommodating RHNA in a Housing Element and the consequences for not issuing adequate permits can be considered punitive. In addition, jurisdictions are subject to penalties if they fail to achieve Housing Element certification, including designating adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA targets. For example, cities and the County may be subject to litigation from individuals, housing rights' organizations, developers, and/or /-/CD. Dependin...
F7
The greater use of audio-only services has the limitation of not offering visual cues, which provide clinicians with important clinical information. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
Finding 7 because there are other penalties that are not directly tied to the statutory deadline. There are penalties associated with lawsuits, which are rarely brought forward for simply missing the statutory deadline, but more due to a perception of continued inactions. Penalties also include eligibility for funding. In addition, depending on specific programs, eligibility for some state funds requires a certified Housing Element (such as PLHA and State HOME funds). Finally, loss of local control is not limited to jurisdictions that do not meet specified timeframes for a certified housing el...
F13
The FCC reported 99.2% of Contra Costa County residents have access to internet broadband for greater use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
f 13 members appointed by the mayor and meets monthly. • Design Review Board o The purpose of the Design Review Board is to review and/or approve the design of exterior construction or modifications for which a building permit, zoning permit, certificate, or discretionary planning approval is required. This includes ensuring affordable housing projects meet objective design standards. The Design Review Board consists of seven members appointed by the mayor and meets twice monthly. • Planning Commission o The purpose of the Planning Commission is to prepare, adopt and maintain a long-range, com...
F15
The Congressional Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 expands Medicare services to allow tele-mental health services to be integrated with in-person sessions, and to be received by beneficiaries in their home without geographic limitations. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
f 15 commissioners appointed by City Council and meets monthly. • The Partnership for the Bay's Future (PBF) Site Team o The purpose of the PBF site team is to develop and pass a public land policy that will inform the process by which the City sells or leases City-owned land to prioritize affordable housing production. The site team consists of cross-departmental city leadership from the Community and Economic Development Departments as well as local community-based organization partners. The site team is CoR Response - "A Plan Without a Home" Page 14 o
F17
BHS does not collect clinical data from network providers, which limits accountability for the outpatient mental health services provided to county residents. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
f 17 Thus, while Richmond has a higher need for, and consequently concentration of, affordable housing, this fact attracts new residents to Richmond, which in turn, increases the competition for and cost of housing and the need for more affordable housing. This additional demand for housing, along with rising construction costs, contributes to rising rental and home prices in Richmond. Housing costs in Richmond grew considerably over the past decade. According to Zillow, between 2011 and 2020, the typical value of a Richmond home increased by 159 percent from $247,317 to $641,530. Additionally...
▶
City of San Pablo
September 07, 2023
•
17 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: +1
(+1, 1, 0)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, cities and the County may be subject to litigation from individuals, housing rights’ organizations, developers, and/or HCD. Depending on court decisions, the cities and the County may lose additional local control, such as suspension of authority to issue building permits or approve certain land use permits; and/or cities and the County may be subject to court-issued fines, court receivership, and streamlined approval processes that remove local discretion. In addition, depending on specific programs, eligibility for some state funds requires a certified Housing Element (such as PLHA and Sta...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
for detailed RHNA numbers from previous Housing Element cycles. As noted above, in recent years, the City of San Pablo has had better success in meeting its Very Low Income and Low-Income housing requirements compared to its Above Moderate-Income housing allocation, and has also had some success in meeting its Moderate-Income housing requirement. For the 2023-2031 RHNA cycle, the expectations for Above Moderate-Income housing, which comprises 46% of San Pablo’s allocation (341 of the 746 total units), continues to be at odds with the local market and economic trends. This persistent expectatio...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
(a) for details. Further, in addressing HCD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) requirements there is a thorough review of the site selection via the Tax Credit Allocation’s Committee (TCAC) Resource Map that designates areas of low-, moderate-, high-, and highest-resource within a jurisdiction and requires specific justification for placing affordable housing projects within low-resources areas. R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider making...
▶
City of San Ramon
September 13, 2023
•
6 pages
• 23 responses
•
Score: +4
(+7, 10, -3)
View Details ▾
23 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services available through BHS were a small portion of the outpatient services provided (7% in 2018; 8% in 2019). RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F1. Within existing city or County infrastructure there is no clear owner who is responsible for achieving RHNA permitting targets. The City partially disagrees with the finding. The City sees the responsibility of achieving RHNA permitting targets as being shared between the city or county and the development community. The State (HCD) and Regional Governing Agency (ABAG) set RHNA targets, and Housing Element law requires cities to identify and appropriately zone adequate housing sites to satisfy our RHNA. One part of the ownership is the city or County's responsibility to prepare, adopt, and...
R1
Develop a hybrid plan to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services in their clinics. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R1. Each city and the county should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. To the extent that this recommendation is reasonable, the recommendation has been implemented. The Certified Housing Element includes policies and programs to promote affordable housing. Under the Community Development Department, specific staff members are responsible fo...
F2
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS did not offer training to prepare clinicians or clients for effective and confidential use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F2. City and County officials see no direct path to meet state-mandated regional housing (RHNA) targets. San Ramon agrees with this finding given that meeting this target depends in part on private actors. The City sees no direct path to meet RHNA targets strictly through its own actions.
R2
Coordinate with network provider groups to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R2. Each city and the County should consider report AH progress and lack of progress using data across all four measured income groups. Special attention should be paid to tracking the housing needs of residents categorized as very low- and low-income. Cities and the county should communicate their progress, biannually, against RHNA targets at council and supervisor meetings. This recommendation has been partially implemented. Currently, staff presents progress reports annually at Planning Commission and City Council public meetings for consideration. These will now be presented biannually.
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F3. There are currently no measurable penalties if a city or a County does not achieve RHNA targets in an approved housing element plan. San Ramon partially agrees with this finding in that there are no penalties for not meeting RHNA targets. Cities approve but do not typically construct housing; therefore, achieving RHNA targets is out of cities' control. The City sees no direct path by the City alone, without the participation of private actors, to achieve RHNA targets once the City has approved its housing element. It would not be appropriate to penalize cities that do everything within the...
R3
Develop a training program for BHS clinicians, network providers, and support staff to facilitate the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R3. Each city and the County should consider creating a dedicated AH commission comprised of a multi-disciplinary team of diverse citizens and led by a current, nonelected, city expert in planning. Each commission would be charged with providing a community voice in the process of helping to identify and address obstacles that hinder the development of affordable housing projects in their community. This recommendation will not be implemented. Currently, the City has a Housing Advisory Committee that provides recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council on housing policy impleme...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F4. Data published by ABAG shows that Contra Costa County and most of its cities have missed their current RHNA targets for very low- and low-income housing allocations. The allocation requirements continue to increase (16x for very low-income and 4x for low-income residents). San Ramon partially agrees with this finding. While cities such as San Ramon have updated General Plans, Specific Plans, and zoning to facilitate housing opportunity sites, and adopted an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and Commercial Linkage Fee Ordinance for the development of Affordable Housing (AH), numerous factors c...
R4
Develop a training program for clients to facilitate and provide support for the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R4. Each city and the County should consider reviewing existing processes and identifying changes that would address or resolve the specific obstacles identified in this report that hinder achieving RHNA allocation targets for very low- and low-income housing their community. This recommendation has been implemented. Through the certification of the City's Housing Element, City staff has reviewed existing processes and identified changes to resolve specific obstacles to achieving affordable housing.
F5
Tele-mental health services are appropriate for clients who are more stable, verbal and insightful. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F5. Many obstacles hinder the development of AH at the local level, specifically for very low- and low-income housing, including: a. Limited availability of land; b. Restrictive zoning policies specific to AH development; c. Limited developer interest to bring projects forward; d. Limited available funding; e. Lack of community support; NIMBY opposition & city council response to NIMBY opposition. f. San Ramon agrees with this finding as applied to the State in general but partially disagrees as it applies to San Ramon. Changing market conditions should also be listed as an obstacle toward dev...
R5
Collect outcome data from BHS providers and programs to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Requires Analysis
Score: 0
R5. Each city and the County should consider developing a public dashboard to report progress against RHNA targets. This recommendation been implemented, and the public dashboard is posted on our City Webpage with associated Agenda packet. The City also maintains a Pending Housing Project webpage of current residential development applications that are under review. https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our city/departments and divisions/community development/planning se rvices/pending housing projects
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F6. Zoning changes are generally addressed only when a project is presented for development. Zoning obstacles include: a. Housing element plans that offer poor land choices for AH development; b. Restrictive height and high-density zoning policies; c. Lack of inclusionary housing ordinance(s) in many cities. San Ramon disagrees with this finding as it applies to San Ramon. Cities such as San Ramon regularly review and address land use and zoning needs through General Plan, Housing Element, and Specific Plan updates. The City prepares General Plan updates in response to goals and priorities in ...
R6
Collect outcome data from network providers to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation has not yet been implemented but will be implemented in the future. By: July 1, 2022. Implemented? Unknown
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R6. Each city and the County should consider, in their individual Housing Element plans, putting forth land zoned “suitable for residential use,” without development obstacles, and located strategically close to existing services, for AH purposes. This recommendation has been implemented. There are privately-owned lands within the City under the General Plan and Zoning Code that could allow development of AH by right. San Ramon's certified Housing Element identifies housing in the city core within a 15-minute walk to jobs, transit, services, and retail shopping. For example, the CityWalk Maste...
F7
The greater use of audio-only services has the limitation of not offering visual cues, which provide clinicians with important clinical information. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F7. Penalties directed at cities and the County (finance, loss of control over local planning) are tied to not meeting state deadlines for Housing Element plan approval. While the meaning of "tied to" in this finding is unclear, San Ramon disagrees with the assertion that loss of control over local planning is tied in any way to not meeting State deadlines for HE plan approval.
R7
Increase the use of MyChart health care information system to make clinical information accessible to clients and providers. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider making zoning changes in light of that review that will support AH in their community. This recommendation has been implemented. Through the certification of the City's Housing Element, we have reviewed existing processes and identified changes to resolve specific obstacles to achieving affordable housing. In accordance with Program 19: Zoning Code Amendments from the City's Certified Housing Element, the City wil...
F8
Tele-mental health services are not appropriate fora. Homeless populationsb. Patients presenting with chronic schizophrenia with a limited capacity to manage the tasks of daily lifec. Patients prescribed controlled substances or injectable medication. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F8. Builder's Remedy and SB35 projects do not address ingrained local obstacles identified in this report that prevent the completion of approved AH projects. As "ingrained local obstacles" are not defined in the report, San Ramon agrees with this finding, assuming that "ingrained local obstacles" are those listed in
R8
Modernize the electronic data collection capabilities of the quality management program to provide meaningful information about mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R8. Cities should consider adopting an inclusionary housing ordinance as part of their standard development policy by the end o
F9
BHS has not incorporated tele-mental health into a comprehensive service delivery model to offer a broad range of opportunities for underserved populations to receive mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F9 for further detail.) Additionally. to streamline the production of affordable housing, State law Gov. Code § 65583 requires cities to rezone land designated for housing within one or three years of Housing Element adoption if existing zoning is not sufficient to accommodate their RHNA. Rezoning is only required if housing is proposed on a site that is not designated for housing.
R9
Develop appropriate clinical metrics to evaluate outcomes that improve the effectiveness of mental health services provided. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R9. Each City and the County should consider how to prioritize the implementation of housing projects that promote development of very low- and low-income housing. This recommendation has been implemented. Once a project is deemed complete, San Ramon typically processes a housing application within 3-4 months. Additionally, by the end o
F10
Access to outpatient mental health services in Contra Costa County suffers from difficulties with transportation to clinics, long wait times for appointments, and insufficient availability of after-hours appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F10. Measure X housing funds are not fully dedicated to building AH for very low- and low-income residents. San Ramon agrees with this finding. Contra Costa County controls the disbursement of funds, and according to the Grand Jury report, funds will be available in 2023. One San Ramon all-affordable project is a recipient of $2 million in funding.
R10
Seek grants and MHSA funding to upgrade the technological resources of the quality management program. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Will Implement
Score: +1
R10. Each city and the County should consider prioritizing Measure X funding requests that support projects that address RHNA targets for very low- and low-income residents. Each city and County should consider reporting regularly to their residents on the use of Measure X funds for such purposes. This recommendation will be implemented by Contra Costa County, not the City of San Ramon. The use of Measure X funds for housing are reported by the County here: https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/8530/Measure-X Sincerely. Steven Spedowfski City Manager City of San Ramon cc: Debbie Chamberlain, Communit...
F11
BHS has a limited number of clinicians who can provide culturally and linguistically sensitive services to diverse minority groups. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F11. Local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund is a critical component of a developer's overall ability to raise funds for an AH development. San Ramon agrees with this finding. A combination of various funding sources and partnerships is required to fill the funding gap between market rate and affordable housing feasibility. The critical aspect lies in the ability of developers to strategically leverage and combine these funding options to meet the financial requirements of the project and ensure its feasibility.
F12
Increasing access to mental health services is a priority for Contra Costa County BHS. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F12. Cities that proactively engage citizens, address zoning obstacles, make reasonable zoning concessions, work collaboratively with developers, provide local funding support, and are united in addressing NIMBY opposition, have been successful is attracting AH projects. San Ramon agrees with this finding.
F13
The FCC reported 99.2% of Contra Costa County residents have access to internet broadband for greater use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F13. The latest RHNA targets for cities and unincorporated Contra Costa County show a significant increase in the number of units that are expected to be permitted for very low- and low-income housing. San Ramon agrees with this finding. Recommendations:
▶
City of Walnut Creek
February 17, 2004
•
6 pages
• 22 responses
•
Score: 0
(+4, 11, -4)
View Details ▾
22 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services available through BHS were a small portion of the outpatient services provided (7% in 2018; 8% in 2019). RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F1: responsible for achieving RHNA permitting targets. Response: Partially disagree with the finding. The City of Walnut Creek has a Housing Manager responsible for implementing housing plans and programs contained in the City's Housing Element and monitoring progress annually as required by State law. However, except in very limited circumstances, jurisdictions do not develop, finance or construct housing projects. City and County officials see no direct path to meet state-mandated regional housing.
R1
Develop a hybrid plan to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services in their clinics. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R1. leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. The City of Walnut Creek has a Housing Manager that oversees a Housing Division that is responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve goals set forth in the City's adopted Housing Element. Each city and the County should report AH progress and lack of progress using data
F2
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS did not offer training to prepare clinicians or clients for effective and confidential use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F2. (RHNA) target. Response: Disagree. In the City of Walnut Creek's Housing Element, the City identified adequate sites to meet its RHNA targets along with programs to encourage housing development. The State will not certify a Housing Element that does not provide a direct and viable path to accommodate RHNA targets. There are currently no measurable penalties if a city or a County does not achieve
R2
Coordinate with network provider groups to integrate tele-mental health services with in-person services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R2. across all four measured income groups. Special attention should be paid to tracking the housing needs of residents categorized as very low- and low-income. Cities and the County should communicate their progress biannually, against RHNA targets at council and supervisor Meetings. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. State Law (Government Code §65400) requires each jurisdiction to prepare an annual progress report (APR) on the jurisdiction's status and progress in implementing its housing element (HE) using forms and definitions adopted by the California Department of Housing...
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F3. RHNA targets in an approved housing element plan. Response: Partially disagree. While there are no legal or financial penalties if the cities and County do not achieve their RHNA targets, there are penalties for not providing sufficient sites to accommodate a city's RHNA allocation in a Housing Element. Penalties include "Builder's Remedy", loss of eligibility for State grant funding and potential lawsuits. Data published by ABAG show that Contra Costa County and most of its cities have
R3
Develop a training program for BHS clinicians, network providers, and support staff to facilitate the use of tele-mental health. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
R3. comprised of a multi-disciplinary team of diverse citizens and led by a current, nonelected, city expert in planning. Each commission would be charged with providing a community voice in the process and helping to identify and address obstacles that hinder the development of affordable housing projects in their community. Response: The recommendation will not be implemented. The City of Walnut Creek has extensive and established planning mechanisms and committees responsible for addressing affordable housing issues. These existing structures provide platforms for community engagement and c...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F4. missed their current RHNA targets for very low- and low-income housing allocations. Response: Agree. Many obstacles hinder the development of AH at the local level, specifically for very
F5
Tele-mental health services are appropriate for clients who are more stable, verbal and insightful. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F5. low and low-income housing, including: a. Limited availability of land; b. Restrictive zoning policies specific to AH development; c. Limited developer interest to bring projects forward; d. Limited available funding; e. Lack of community support; f. NIMBY opposition & city council response to NIMBY opposition. Response: Partially Disagree. Though the above list of obstacles can affect the development of affordable housing, the City of Walnut Creek has addressed each item in our adopted Housing Element programs, policies, and actions. The cost of land and the amount of funding needed for a...
R5
Collect outcome data from BHS providers and programs to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R5. progress against RHNA targets. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. Each jurisdiction must prepare an annual progress report (APR) on the jurisdiction's status and progress in implementing its housing element using forms and definitions adopted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). (Government Code Section 65400.) Each jurisdiction's APR must be submitted to HCD and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) by April 1 of each year (covering the previous calendar year (CY)). HCD compiles and showcases all APRs through their interac...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F6. development. Zoning obstacles include: a. Housing element plans that offer poor land choices for AH development; b. Restrictive height and high-density zoning policies; c. Lack of inclusionary housing ordinance(s) in many cities. Response: Disagree. The City of Walnut Creek proactively made changes in the last RHNA Cycle to incorporate more housing sites, including two Specific Plans (West Downtown Specific Plan and North Downtown Specific Plan) to significantly increase housing opportunities near BART stations. In addition, the City has an established and effective inclusionary ordinance ...
R6
Collect outcome data from network providers to provide feedback to improve mental health services delivered to the community. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation has not yet been implemented but will be implemented in the future. By: July 1, 2022. Implemented? Unknown
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R6. Each city and the County should consider, in their individual Housing Element plans, putting forth land zoned "suitable for residential use," without development obstacles, and located strategically close to existing services, for AH purposes. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. As required by State Law, jurisdictions are required as part of the Housing Element to prepare a site inventory identifying land suitable and available for residential development to meet the locality's regional housing needs by income level.
F7
The greater use of audio-only services has the limitation of not offering visual cues, which provide clinicians with important clinical information. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F7. planning) are tied to not meeting state deadlines for Housing Element plan approval. Response: Agree.
R7
Increase the use of MyChart health care information system to make clinical information accessible to clients and providers. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R7. Each city and the County should consider reviewing their zoning policies to identify restrictive zoning policies unique to their jurisdiction that impede AH projects and consider making zoning changes in light of that review that will support AH in their community. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. Through the Housing Element process, jurisdictions have reviewed their zoning policies and identified potential affordable housing development constraints unique to a jurisdiction.
F8
Tele-mental health services are not appropriate fora. Homeless populationsb. Patients presenting with chronic schizophrenia with a limited capacity to manage the tasks of daily lifec. Patients prescribed controlled substances or injectable medication. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F8. Builder's Remedy and SB35 projects do not address ingrained local obstacles identified in this report that prevent the completion of approved AH projects. Response: Partially Disagree. While Builder's Remedy and SB 35 projects are tools that can expedite affordable housing development, they may not comprehensively address all the ingrained obstacles identified in this report that hinder the completion of approved Affordable Housing projects.
R8
Modernize the electronic data collection capabilities of the quality management program to provide meaningful information about mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors The recommendation requires further analysis. An explanation was given. Due: June 30, 2022 Analysis Complete? Unknown
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R8. Cities should consider adopting an inclusionary housing ordinance as part of their standard development policy by the end o
F9
BHS has not incorporated tele-mental health into a comprehensive service delivery model to offer a broad range of opportunities for underserved populations to receive mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
F9. When local Redevelopment Agencies (RDA's) were discontinued by the state in 2012, the County and cities did not address the loss of funding for affordable housing or find alternative funding to support affordable housing projects until voters passed Measure X in Novembe
R9
Develop appropriate clinical metrics to evaluate outcomes that improve the effectiveness of mental health services provided. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
R9. Each city and the County should consider how to prioritize the implementation of housing projects that promote development of very low- and low-income housing. Response: The recommendation has been implemented. According to State law, it is mandatory for cities and counties to assess all development projects in the sequence they are received. The City of Walnut Creek does, however, have a streamlined review process as well as an expedited review policy for special needs housing.
F10
Access to outpatient mental health services in Contra Costa County suffers from difficulties with transportation to clinics, long wait times for appointments, and insufficient availability of after-hours appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F10. Measure X housing funds are not fully dedicated to building AH for very low- and low- income residents. Response: Agree.
R10
Seek grants and MHSA funding to upgrade the technological resources of the quality management program. RESPONDENT RESPONSE TO RECOMMENDATION Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the recommendation. A summary was provided.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
R10. Each city and the County should consider prioritizing Measure X funding requests that support projects that address RHNA targets for very low- and low-income residents. Each city and County should consider reporting regularly to their residents on the use of Measure X funds for such purposes. Response: Contra Costa County oversees Measure X funds, not the City of Walnut Creek. The City would, however, accept such funding if it were to become available. The City Council approved this response letter at its Septembe
F11
BHS has a limited number of clinicians who can provide culturally and linguistically sensitive services to diverse minority groups. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
F11. Local funding provided by bonds like Measure X Housing Fund is a critical component of a developer's overall ability to raise funds for an AH development. Response: Partially Disagree. Measure X is not under the City of Walnut Creek's purview. As such, Measure X dollars allocated to housing production are not critical to the overall ability of Walnut Creek to meet the City's RHNA requirements for affordable housing.
F12
Increasing access to mental health services is a priority for Contra Costa County BHS. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
F12. Cities that proactively engage citizens, address zoning obstacles, make reasonable zoning concessions, work collaboratively with developers, provide local funding support, and are united in addressing NIMBY opposition, have been successful in attracting AH projects. Response: Disagree. The City of Walnut Creek actively works with the community, property owners, developers and others to create and partially fund affordable housing opportunities in the City. These proactive steps alone are not enough to successfully attract affordable housing projects. Additional factors that impact interes...
F13
The FCC reported 99.2% of Contra Costa County residents have access to internet broadband for greater use of tele-mental health services. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Agree
Score: +1
F13. The latest RHNA targets for cities and unincorporated Contra Costa County show a significant increase in the number of units that are expected to be permitted for very low and low-income housing. Response: Agree. <b>RECOMMENDATIONS:</b> Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear
▶
Town of Moraga
September 12, 2023
•
18 pages
• 3 responses
•
Score: 0
(+0, 1, 0)
View Details ▾
3 responses to findings and recommendations
F3
During the Covid-19 pandemic, BHS tele-mental health services continue to be underutilized. While audio-only increased to 52% of all outpatient services, tele-mental health was 18% of outpatient services delivered RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent disagrees partially with this finding. An explanation was given.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
, local governments may be subject to litigation from individuals, housing rights' organizations, developers, and/or HCD. Depending on court decisions, local governments run the risk of losing additional local land use control, including the possible suspension of authority to issue building permits or approve certain land use permits for failing to adopt a Housing Element that shows progress toward supporting affordable housing units. In addition, depending on specific programs, eligibility for some State funds requires have a certified Housing Element (such as PLHA and State HOME funds). Fin...
F4
At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, tele-mental health and audio-only services decreased the number of missed appointments. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
for detailed RHNA number changes from previous Housing Element cycles. <b>Grand Jury Recommendations</b> R1. Each city and the County should consider assigning a staff position with clear leadership, ownership and accountability to achieve allocated RHNA targets. The individual in this position would be responsible for establishing and promoting an operational plan to achieve the RHNA goals set forth in the housing element plan. Response: This recommendation has been implemented. California's Housing Element Law acknowledges that, in order for the private market to adequately address the housi...
F6
Tele-mental health services are appropriate to use with clients displaying symptoms of anxiety and depression. RESPONDENT RESPONSE Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Respondent agrees with the finding.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
(a) for details. Further, in addressing HCD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) requirements there is a thorough review of the site selection via the Tax Credit Allocation's Committee (TCAC) Resource Map that designates areas of low, moderate, high, and highest resource within a jurisdiction and requires specific justification for placing affordable housing projects within low-resources areas. On February 22, 2023, the Town adopted zoning amendments consistent with the adopted sixth cycle Housing Element to increase the maximum allowable density to 24 units/acre, and 30 units/acre f...