⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Conclusions 1
-
CL1The Grand Jury review of two of these entities arose from citizen complaints that turned out to be unfounded. It is the Grand Jury's position that a useful purpose is served in providing the outcome of the investigation to both those who were subjects of the investigation and the public. In the case of the Office of the City Auditor, their performance came to the attention of the Grand Jury through routine contacts made in the course of performing its general oversight responsibilities. The Grand Jury is pleased to recognize their noteworthy example of public service that by and large goes unnoticed by the general public. The San Diego HOT program is an example of the good work done by the police department to offer safety and hope to a disadvantaged populace. The complexity of the November election focused attention on the Office of the Registrar of Voters. The Grand Jury recognizes a job well done. Monarch School is a feel-good example of civic successes. It provides a path towards normalcy for the homeless children and youth in San Diego. These examples provide encouraging evidence that, despite some of the high-profile cases of poor performance that create headlines, many public agencies are doing a good job, serving the citizens of their communities well.