Lassen County Grand Jury • 2023-2024

Of the 2023-2024 Lassen County Civil Grand Jury Hall of Justice

Published: June 30, 2024 45 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7

Findings and Recommendations 12 findings

F1
It is clear that the City of Susanville has positioned itself for the challenges of homelessness and is staying ahead of the problems.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Lassen County Board of Supervisors should form a committee and hold quarterly collaborative meetings (if not already occurring), to include Lassen County Housing, Lassen County Health & Human Services representatives, Fish & Game, California Highway Patrol (CHP), Lassen County Sheriff, Susanville Police Department, Susanville Parks & Recreation, County and City Supervisor representatives and concerned / affected citizens, with reports to appropriate local media.
F8
Lack of local press coverage (i.e., printed newspaper) or news outlet (broadcast news), limits communication to the public regarding current status of county business.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The Chief Administrative Officer should work with the Lassen County Board of Supervisors to budget for, seek, and hire a Public Information Officer (PIO) to report on a regular basis to the public, so the public is more informed and can elect their representatives with necessary knowledge in hand.
F9
County government has failed to attract sufficient qualified persons and prospective officeholders to both fill the available positions and present a choice for the voters. This is not restricted to the Office of the Auditor-Controller.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
The Board of Supervisors should develop a comprehensive written plan to find and entice qualified persons to run for office.
F10
The process of appointment by the Board of Supervisors for the Auditor-Controller vacant seat was unsatisfactory given that the Office of the Auditor-Controller is a technically challenging and professionally demanding position. The Civil Grand Jury has found that the appointment process in 2020 resulted in the appointment of a candidate incapable of handling a looming software transition of a vital personnel and payroll system.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
The obvious option is to recommend conducting a special election, however, that is barred by California Government Code. Short of a legislative remedy, the Civil Grand Jury can find no effective recommendation for improvement.
F11
In 2022, there were nine months left before the installment of new county officers, yet the Board of Supervisors was slow and ineffective in its effort to recruit a new Auditor-Controller, leading to a hasty decision for appointment.
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
The Board of Supervisors should engage in contingency planning for this scenario (finding
F12
County employees charged with keeping track of both county funds and State and Federal dollars are sorely in need of training and professional development. 37
Related Recommendations (1)
R12
The Chief Administrative Officer should mandate annual continuing education and training for all county staff that work with or handle funds and/or accounts, to include management of State and 38 Federal grants. Enforce attendance and test for comprehension. Initiate HR actions as required. The Chief Administrative Officer should routinely assure the Board of Supervisors that this is carried out.
F13
The Civil Grand Jury recognizes that the deficiencies noted in the external single audits for the past eight years, generally involve accounting methods required for Federal grants (accrual basis) being different from the perfectly adequate methods used for decades (cash basis) in the accounting of funds generally, and failures in various county departments to recognize this difference.
Related Recommendations (1)
R13
The Board of Supervisors should provide the Auditor-Controller’s Office with resources to hire and train a compliance auditor, trained to find compliance issues before they show up in the Annual Single Audit.
F14
While problems with the transition from outdated accounting software to the new Munis software has been bumpy and wasteful, the effort has been stabilized and is on-track to full implementation by July 2024.
Related Recommendations (1)
R14
The Civil Grand Jury would like to recommend that an award be given to Ms. Cardenas for her unrelenting service to the County of Lassen to get the Auditor-Controller’s Office back on track and have a clean slate for the 2027 elected official that takes her place! If this transition is successful, this would call for an award of all IT employees involved in this effort as well!
F15
The Civil Grand Jury found no written succession plan in the Office of the Auditor-Controller. When the incumbent Wemple left office in 2020 for retirement, there was no one to fill the void. Appointed Auditor-Controller Morgan left in early 2023 for health reasons. Therefore, the statutory remedy of appointing a qualified officeholder was only partly successful, resulting ultimately in a vacant ballot in 2022, followed by a vacant office in 2023.
Related Recommendations (1)
R15
The Board of Supervisors should direct the Chief Administrative Officer to request each elected county official to come up with a written succession plan as well as written professional development plans. These may be published in employee policies. The Board of Supervisors should consider the question of requiring the Chief Administrative Officer to do a similar process for all non-elected county departments.
F16
The results of the advisory votes on County Measures T & U by a margin of three to one, show that the voters want to elect their Auditor, and do not deem to trust that selection to the Lassen County Board of Supervisors. Moreover, the voters desire that the offices of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector remain vital, separate, and independent parts of county government.
Related Recommendations (1)
R16
Based on the results of Measures T and U in the 2024 election, the Board of Supervisors should respect the decision and will of the voters. The Board of Supervisors should request the County Clerk to hold separate elective races for the Offices of Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector for the June 2026 election. The office staffs should be prepared to separate as directed by the current incumbent Cardenas. The incumbent Auditor-Controller-Treasurer-Tax Collector will leave office in January 2027, which means two separate county elected offices will be up for election.
F17
Public office is a public trust. When Auditor-Controller Wemple was re-elected to office in 2018, she had entered a four-year compact with the voters. Wemple let The People of Lassen County down by her early vacating of the trust the voters placed in her to fulfill that oath.
Related Recommendations (1)
R17
The Civil Grand Jury has no actionable recommendation for Finding F17.
F18
The Civil Grand Jury found it hard to find some information on county websites, especially organizational charts to lead us to certain points of contact for further information.
Related Recommendations (1)
R18
The Chief Administrative Officer should ensure that detailed organizational charts (with names and titles of each position) for the full County Government, as well as each Department/Office, are developed and published on the County website; as well as ensure they are updated and re-published whenever there are changes.

Additional Recommendations 7

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

No Responses Found 6

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Lassen County County
Lassen County Auditor-Controller Elected County Office
Lassen County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office
Lassen County District Attorney Elected County Office
Lassen County Office of Education Agency
Lassen County Treasurer-Tax Collector Elected County Office