📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Nevada County Grand Jury
• 2013-2014
Nevada County Superior Court Office of the Jury Commissioner
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 4 findings
F1
Page 100
- Although the Stall' is attempting to remedy some of the identificd sal'Cty and security issues. there arc still ddiciencies in the security camcra syslCm that needs immediate attention b) the AOC. Agree. Fi.3 NCSO could be active in assisting the Statl in their request for camera upgrades because the cameras are a first-line observation of potential harm, Disagree. The COllit \\mild certainly \\elcome any help the NCSO might offer tu enhance the Court's camera system. Ilowc\er. this system is the COlllt's responsibility and \\l' rely on the Judicial COllncil fl.,!' 1i.lI1ding to expand! enhance the system.
F2
Page 105
Although the Staff is attempting to remedy some of the identified safety and security issues, there are still deficiencies in the security camera system that needs Immediate attention by the AOe. Disagree. The Nevada County Board of Supervisors provides leadership in working with the Sheriff and Court to help direct funding to the highest priorities. Safety and security concerns have not risen to a level high enough to make this a priority project.
F3
Page 105
NCSO could be active in assisting the Staff in their request for camera upgrades because t he cameras are a first-l ine observation of potential harm. Agree. The Nevada County Sheriff Office has agreed to participate in discussions with Court Staff regarding Courthouse Security.
F4
Page 105
This issue has been on the forefront for several years without resolution. The safety of t he public, the Courthouse employees and NCSO staff remains at risk. Disagree. The Nevada County Board of Supervisors concurs with the Nevada County Sheriff Office that there is not an imminent threat of serious injury to t he public, the Courthouse employees and NCSO staff. The NCSO has an excellent record in transporting prisoners from transportation unit to the Courthouse. B. RESPONSES TO RECOMMENDATIONS:
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 96The safety of county and court employees and the public is compromised by a lack of security cameras in some areas of the Courthouse. Partially Disagree Due to past experience, we do not feel an imminent threat of serious injury to the public, courthouse employees, andlor county employees exists. We have had an excellent record with our transport of prisoners from transportation units to the Courthouse in Nevada City. We are committed to mitigating risk at every opportunity within the County's existing resources. Inmates are transported from the transportation unit to the Courthouse in customary restraints, including leg shackles and waist shackles. Officer safety practices are primary in maintaining a safe environment while transporting prisoners; although security cameras may provide additional security.
-
R2Page 106The Nevada County Board of Supervisors, Nevada County Sheriff's Office, Administrative Offices of the Court and Nevada County Superior Court staff need to prioritize fund ing requests and obtain the funding from the AOC to implement the safety improvements. This recommendation will not be implemented. See R.i. above.
-
R3Page 106The Nevada County Board of Supervisors, Nevada County Sheriff's Office, Administrative Offices of t he Court and Nevada County Superior Court staff need to follow through with the request for funding, the implementation of the safety improvements and ensure the required work is completed. This recommendation will not be implemented . See R.i. above.
-
R4Page 97This issue has been on the forefront for several years without resolution. The safety of the public, the Courthouse employees and NCSO staff remains at risk. Partially Disagree The issue has not been fully resolved, yet, due to past experience, we do not feel an imminent threat of serious injury to the public, courthouse employees, and/or county employees exists. We have had an excellent record with our transport of prisoners from transportation units to the Courthouse in Nevada City. We are committed to mitigating risk at every opportunity within the County's existing resources. Inmates are transported from the transportation unit to the Courthouse in customary restraints, including leg shackles and waist shackles. Officer safety practices are primary in maintaining a safe environment while transporting prisoners; although security cameras may provide additional security. RECOMMENDATIONS:
No Responses Found 3
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
Nevada County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office
Nevada County Sheriff
Elected County Office