Score: +8
(10/0/2)
Napa County Grand Jury
• 2009-2010
Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 14 findings
F1
The original intent of the NCTPA was to provide transportation services for Napa County residents.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Staffing and funding was increased to provide non-transportation services
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The NCTPA has become the de-facto forward planning agency for Napa County and its municipalities.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Fare box collections account for approximately 15 percent of the 2009- 2010 VINE Operating Cost of $4,736,713.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The current NCTPA budget is difficult to understand due to combining transportation and non-transportation revenue and expenses.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Prepare and publish a budget summary each year with sufficient detail which can be easily understood by the public
F6
VINE ridership is trending downward increasing the cost per person trip
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Passenger subsidies have doubled in the past eight years.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
New state of the art vehicles have been purchased and more ordered while ridership is decreasing.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Many activities of the NCTPA “Overall Work Program F/Y 2009-2010” are for non-transportation related activities.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Focus on NCTPA stated main purpose of providing for transportation planning and services delivery
F10
The BOD of the NCTPA has failed to follow up on certain audit findings and recommendations.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Create oversight committees, including an audit committee
F11
The BOD approves issues with potential policy and financial impact by consent agenda without discussion.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Create oversight committees, including an audit committee
F12
The Agricultural Workers Vanpool Program started with a pilot program under a State grant and the program needs to be self-sufficient by June 2011.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Develop a plan for the Agricultural Worker Vanpool Program to be self sufficient after June 2011
F13
The Single Audit Report 2008-2009 indicates there were eight areas of deficiency, some of which had been brought to the attention of the BOD in previous audits.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Correct the deficiencies listed in the latest outside audit and other regulatory agency reviews 14
F14
The NCTPA was able to secure ARRA funds for the repair/maintenance of local and county roadways. Continuation of funding for future repair and maintenance programs throughout the County is unclear.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
Establish a plan to seek ongoing funding for street and roadway repair and maintenance REQUEST FOR RESPONSES The Grand Jury requests responses from: NCTPA Board of Directors for all re
Agency Responses 1
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.