⚠️ Translation Notice:
This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Note: Missing finding numbers detected:
F2
Findings and Recommendations
2 findings
It is extremely costly to equip a fire department for only the occasional fire response; the County and fifteen towns/cities have not been proactive in challenging fire departments to adopt changes that are more cost effective and that better serve their communities. Further, unions are more interested in job preservation than in providing the right mix of capabilities at a reasonable cost, using scare tactics to influence the public and fostering firefighter unwillingness to collaborate with EMS. We disagree with Finding 1. We, as a board believe that we have been responsive to change, as has the agency we contract with - Santa Clara County Fire. In 1996 we dissolved our small agency and began contracting with a much larger agency (Santa Clara County Fire) for emergency services. This change improved resources available to our district residents and gave us a more regional approach to our emergency services. As we did in 1996, 2006, and will in 2016 (upon contract renewal), we review the services and response criteria and develop it to meet our specialized and diverse needs from standard emergency medical response to wild lands firefighting. We do not interact with the Union – we contract at a fixed fee for services and therefor do not have sufficient information to respond to the Union part of the question. In our limited exposure to the County fire system (we have one station) we see that the firefighters collaborate and work well with the EMS personnel. Serving the town of Los Altos Hills and the unincorporated areas generally referred to as the Loyola and San Antonio Hills
Related Recommendations (1)
All fifteen towns/cities—Campbell, Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, Santa Clara, Saratoga, Sunnyvale—and the County (for CCFD and SCFD) should determine the emergency response service they want to achieve, particularly as to the result, then determine how best to achieve that. In response to recommendation 1B we agree and believe we do that now.
Whether the emergency responder is a firefighter-paramedic or an EMS paramedic matters little to the person with the medical emergency; using firefighter-paramedics in firefighting equipment as first responders to all non-police emergencies is unnecessarily costly when less expensive paramedics on ambulances possess the skills needed to address the 96% of calls that are not fire related. As to Finding 3, we disagree. Our district is unique and very diverse; we respond to many types of calls from freeway accidents to remote wild land fires and rescues. Our district is diverse and has remote areas. We believe emergency responders should be well-equipped with the proper tools in order to respond appropriately.. Upon completion of a call they may be dispatched to another type of call and need the proper equipment to respond accordingly,. Arriving to one of these remote areas without the necessary equipment and personnel will cause delays to emergency services and endanger our district residents' safety and welfare.
Related Recommendations (1)
All fifteen towns/cities—Campbell, Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, Santa Clara, Saratoga, Sunnyvale—and the County (for CCFD and SCFD) should adopt an emergency services department mentality and staff or contract accordingly to meet demand. To recommendation 3A we agree, and we do this now. If you have any questions for need any clarification please contact me. Sincerely, David Bergman President Serving the town of Los Altos Hills and the unincorporated areas generally referred to as the Loyola and San Antonio Hills
No Responses Found
1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.