Score: -4 (2/0/6)
Ventura County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

Camarillo Congregate Meal Program

Published: May 26, 2016 13 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 21 findings

F01
Seniors in the Camarillo area have less access to congregate meals than those in other areas of the County. (FA-09, FA-10)
No recommendations for this finding
F02
The CHCD receives less of the available public funding for the congregate program than other service providers in the County. It only applies for funding to cover costs of a once-a-month congregate meal. (FA-08, FA- 10, FA-11)
No recommendations for this finding
F03
The senior population of Camarillo has not been formally surveyed to determine its need for a five-day-a week congregate meal program. (FA-13)
No recommendations for this finding
F04
The City of Camarillo allocates limited General Fund support for senior programs when compared with other cities in the County. (FA-14)
No recommendations for this finding
F05
The City of Camarillo, the Camarillo Health Care District, and the Pleasant Valley Recreation and Park District have not adequately collaborated or coordinated efforts to meet the needs of seniors in Camarillo. (FA-11, FA-19, FA-20, FA-21) 4 Camarillo Congregate Meal Program Recommendations
No recommendations for this finding
F06
The CHCD is the official “service provider” for publicly funded congregate meals managed by the VCAAA.
No recommendations for this finding
F07
The City of Camarillo has no formal relationship with the CHCD and the PVRPD.
No recommendations for this finding
F08
According to the Administration for Community Living, the congregate meal program offers meals to seniors in a social setting. It helps “...to keep older Americans healthy and prevent the need for more costly medical interventions....The program presents opportunities for social engagement, information on healthy aging and meaningful volunteer roles, all of which contribute to an older individual’s overall health and well-being.” (Ref-06)
No recommendations for this finding
F09
Congregate meal programs are offered Monday through Friday in ten County locations. The Camarillo Health Care District serves a congregate meal one day a month. (Att-01)
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The VCAAA and its nutrition service providers throughout the County apply for State and federal funds on a four-year cycle. Service providers responded to VCAAA’s Request for Proposal for fiscal years 2016-2020. On March 9, 2016, the VCAAA Advisory Council approved these plans. Camarillo’s proposal for serving a congregate meal one day per month was approved. (Ref-07)
No recommendations for this finding
F11
From 2005 to 2012, the CHCD and the PVRPD had a Memorandum of Understanding for serving a congregate meal to seniors four days a week. The CHCD provided staff and services; the PVRPD provided facilities. (Ref-08)
No recommendations for this finding
F12
According to the draft of the VCAAA Master Strategic Plan 2016-2020, Camarillo residents 60 years of age and older make up approximately 23% of the City’s population compared to 18.1% in the County. (Ref-09)
No recommendations for this finding
F13
Although residents 60 and older comprise approximately 23% of the City’s population, the Grand Jury could find no evidence that the City has conducted a recent formal comprehensive survey of this population to determine its needs.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
The ten cities in the County allocate funding for senior programs through their general funds. This funding ranges from $66.83 per senior in the City of Moorpark to $2.36 per senior in the City of Camarillo. [Note: Some senior programs in the cities are subsidized by funds from other sources.] (Att-02)
No recommendations for this finding
F15
As part of the process in developing its draft Master Strategic Plan 2016- 2020, the VCAAA conducted a “Consumers’ Survey” of County senior residents and their caregivers. Access to nutritious food ranked second only to transportation in importance to those seniors who responded. (Ref-09) Camarillo Congregate Meal Program 3
No recommendations for this finding
F16
Federal and State funding for the mandated nutrition programs has been stagnant. Service providers are currently responsible for 10% of the cost of the program although this amount can be met with donations “in kind”.
No recommendations for this finding
F17
The City of Camarillo is currently in discussion with the PVRPD to allocate funds for increased services for seniors in Camarillo.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
The PVRPD, in conjunction with City organizations/businesses, sponsors a senior meal and movie event once a month. According to the PVRPD, seniors have been turned away because the program is so popular and resources are limited.
No recommendations for this finding
F19
The PVRPD 2013-2018 Strategic Plan calls for open communication with other districts in the area. According to the plan, “The District will explore partnerships with other local agencies, businesses and non-profits to expand program areas…” including those for seniors. One of the five year goals is to be “…actively engaged with strategic partners in the community.” (Ref-10)
No recommendations for this finding
F20
The Grand Jury could find no evidence of strategic planning by CHCD.
No recommendations for this finding
F21
The Camarillo City Council has established goals and objectives for 2015- 2016, including:  “…to maintain effective communication with local, state and federal elected representatives and other local agencies including schools, parks and special districts.”  “…to maintain effective communications with the community.” (Ref-11) Findings
No recommendations for this finding

Agency Responses 8

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.